Cargando…

Re-evaluating the Lejour Technique for Breast Reduction in Patients with Macromastia

BACKGROUND: Limited scar Lejour technique for breast reduction is conventionally used to remove less than 500 g of breast tissue per breast, but is effective for greater macromastia. Plastic surgery residents gain limited experience with this technique, and it is infrequently performed in the United...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Copeland-Halperin, Libby R., Smith, Lauren, Copeland, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001783
_version_ 1783331422700830720
author Copeland-Halperin, Libby R.
Smith, Lauren
Copeland, Michelle
author_facet Copeland-Halperin, Libby R.
Smith, Lauren
Copeland, Michelle
author_sort Copeland-Halperin, Libby R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Limited scar Lejour technique for breast reduction is conventionally used to remove less than 500 g of breast tissue per breast, but is effective for greater macromastia. Plastic surgery residents gain limited experience with this technique, and it is infrequently performed in the United States. To understand technique selection, we surveyed board-certified plastic surgeons and compared outcomes with the Lejour technique in 1 practice to those with other methods. METHODS: We surveyed American Society of Plastic Surgeons members about techniques for breast reduction and compared outcomes with procedures performed by various techniques by a single surgeon (M.C.). RESULTS: Of 321 survey respondents, 33% reported formal training in the Lejour technique. Over 70% used mainly the inferior pedicle Wise procedure; 14% used mainly the Lejour or modified Lejour technique. In a series of reduction mammaplasties by 1 surgeon in 119 patients between 1997 and 2006, 14 underwent inferior pedicle Wise pattern and 105 involved the Lejour technique. Mean tissue mass removal was 1,136 g/breast (range, 170–4,050 g). Major complications occurred in 1.74% overall, and 0% and 1.9% for the Wise and Lejour techniques, respectively (P = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Although most American Society of Plastic Surgeons respondents were not formally trained in the Lejour technique and seldom perform the procedure, it can be employed for reduction mammaplasty with no greater risk of complications than the Wise method. The Lejour technique should be incorporated during residency training as an alternative for reduction mammaplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5999434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59994342018-06-19 Re-evaluating the Lejour Technique for Breast Reduction in Patients with Macromastia Copeland-Halperin, Libby R. Smith, Lauren Copeland, Michelle Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Limited scar Lejour technique for breast reduction is conventionally used to remove less than 500 g of breast tissue per breast, but is effective for greater macromastia. Plastic surgery residents gain limited experience with this technique, and it is infrequently performed in the United States. To understand technique selection, we surveyed board-certified plastic surgeons and compared outcomes with the Lejour technique in 1 practice to those with other methods. METHODS: We surveyed American Society of Plastic Surgeons members about techniques for breast reduction and compared outcomes with procedures performed by various techniques by a single surgeon (M.C.). RESULTS: Of 321 survey respondents, 33% reported formal training in the Lejour technique. Over 70% used mainly the inferior pedicle Wise procedure; 14% used mainly the Lejour or modified Lejour technique. In a series of reduction mammaplasties by 1 surgeon in 119 patients between 1997 and 2006, 14 underwent inferior pedicle Wise pattern and 105 involved the Lejour technique. Mean tissue mass removal was 1,136 g/breast (range, 170–4,050 g). Major complications occurred in 1.74% overall, and 0% and 1.9% for the Wise and Lejour techniques, respectively (P = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Although most American Society of Plastic Surgeons respondents were not formally trained in the Lejour technique and seldom perform the procedure, it can be employed for reduction mammaplasty with no greater risk of complications than the Wise method. The Lejour technique should be incorporated during residency training as an alternative for reduction mammaplasty. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5999434/ /pubmed/29922564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001783 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Copeland-Halperin, Libby R.
Smith, Lauren
Copeland, Michelle
Re-evaluating the Lejour Technique for Breast Reduction in Patients with Macromastia
title Re-evaluating the Lejour Technique for Breast Reduction in Patients with Macromastia
title_full Re-evaluating the Lejour Technique for Breast Reduction in Patients with Macromastia
title_fullStr Re-evaluating the Lejour Technique for Breast Reduction in Patients with Macromastia
title_full_unstemmed Re-evaluating the Lejour Technique for Breast Reduction in Patients with Macromastia
title_short Re-evaluating the Lejour Technique for Breast Reduction in Patients with Macromastia
title_sort re-evaluating the lejour technique for breast reduction in patients with macromastia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001783
work_keys_str_mv AT copelandhalperinlibbyr reevaluatingthelejourtechniqueforbreastreductioninpatientswithmacromastia
AT smithlauren reevaluatingthelejourtechniqueforbreastreductioninpatientswithmacromastia
AT copelandmichelle reevaluatingthelejourtechniqueforbreastreductioninpatientswithmacromastia