Cargando…
Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a clinically critical disease. However, it is still controversial whether the combined use of traditional Chinese medicine Xuebijing injections (XBJI) and western medicine can enhance curative efficacy and ensure safety compared with western medicine alone. Thus, this research...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010971 |
_version_ | 1783331435861508096 |
---|---|
author | Xiao, Shi-Hui Luo, Liang Liu, Xiang-Hong Zhou, Yu-Ming Liu, Hong-Ming Huang, Zhen-Fei |
author_facet | Xiao, Shi-Hui Luo, Liang Liu, Xiang-Hong Zhou, Yu-Ming Liu, Hong-Ming Huang, Zhen-Fei |
author_sort | Xiao, Shi-Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a clinically critical disease. However, it is still controversial whether the combined use of traditional Chinese medicine Xuebijing injections (XBJI) and western medicine can enhance curative efficacy and ensure safety compared with western medicine alone. Thus, this research consisted of a systematic review of the curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine XBJI combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population. METHODS: A total of 8 databases were retrieved: 4 foreign databases, namely, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science; and 4 Chinese databases, namely, Sino Med, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and Wangfang Data. The time span of retrieval began from the establishment of each database and ended on August 1, 2017. Published randomized controlled trials about the combined use of traditional Chinese medicine XBJI and western medicine were included, regardless of language. Stata12.0 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Finally, 16 papers involving 1335 cases were included. The result of meta-analysis showed that compared with the single use of ulinastatin, traditional Chinese medicine XBJI combined with ulinastatin could reduce the time of mechanical ventilation, shorten the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, improve the 28-day survival rate, and decrease the occurrence rate of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, case fatality rate, procalcitonin (PCT) content, APACKEII score, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α level, and interleukin (IL)-6 level. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the common basic therapeutic regimen, the combined use of traditional Chinese medicine XBJI and ulinastatin was compared with the use of ulinastatin alone for treating sepsis in the Chinese population. It was found that the number of adverse events of combination therapy is not significantly increased, and its clinical safety is well within the permitted range. However, considering the limitations of this conclusion due to the low-quality articles included in the present research, it is necessary to conduct high-quality randomized controlled trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5999488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59994882018-06-20 Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis Xiao, Shi-Hui Luo, Liang Liu, Xiang-Hong Zhou, Yu-Ming Liu, Hong-Ming Huang, Zhen-Fei Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a clinically critical disease. However, it is still controversial whether the combined use of traditional Chinese medicine Xuebijing injections (XBJI) and western medicine can enhance curative efficacy and ensure safety compared with western medicine alone. Thus, this research consisted of a systematic review of the curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine XBJI combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population. METHODS: A total of 8 databases were retrieved: 4 foreign databases, namely, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science; and 4 Chinese databases, namely, Sino Med, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and Wangfang Data. The time span of retrieval began from the establishment of each database and ended on August 1, 2017. Published randomized controlled trials about the combined use of traditional Chinese medicine XBJI and western medicine were included, regardless of language. Stata12.0 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Finally, 16 papers involving 1335 cases were included. The result of meta-analysis showed that compared with the single use of ulinastatin, traditional Chinese medicine XBJI combined with ulinastatin could reduce the time of mechanical ventilation, shorten the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, improve the 28-day survival rate, and decrease the occurrence rate of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, case fatality rate, procalcitonin (PCT) content, APACKEII score, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α level, and interleukin (IL)-6 level. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the common basic therapeutic regimen, the combined use of traditional Chinese medicine XBJI and ulinastatin was compared with the use of ulinastatin alone for treating sepsis in the Chinese population. It was found that the number of adverse events of combination therapy is not significantly increased, and its clinical safety is well within the permitted range. However, considering the limitations of this conclusion due to the low-quality articles included in the present research, it is necessary to conduct high-quality randomized controlled trials. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5999488/ /pubmed/29879049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010971 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Xiao, Shi-Hui Luo, Liang Liu, Xiang-Hong Zhou, Yu-Ming Liu, Hong-Ming Huang, Zhen-Fei Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis |
title | Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | curative efficacy and safety of traditional chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the chinese population: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010971 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaoshihui curativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesemedicinexuebijinginjectionscombinedwithulinastatinfortreatingsepsisinthechinesepopulationametaanalysis AT luoliang curativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesemedicinexuebijinginjectionscombinedwithulinastatinfortreatingsepsisinthechinesepopulationametaanalysis AT liuxianghong curativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesemedicinexuebijinginjectionscombinedwithulinastatinfortreatingsepsisinthechinesepopulationametaanalysis AT zhouyuming curativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesemedicinexuebijinginjectionscombinedwithulinastatinfortreatingsepsisinthechinesepopulationametaanalysis AT liuhongming curativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesemedicinexuebijinginjectionscombinedwithulinastatinfortreatingsepsisinthechinesepopulationametaanalysis AT huangzhenfei curativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesemedicinexuebijinginjectionscombinedwithulinastatinfortreatingsepsisinthechinesepopulationametaanalysis |