Cargando…

Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a clinically critical disease. However, it is still controversial whether the combined use of traditional Chinese medicine Xuebijing injections (XBJI) and western medicine can enhance curative efficacy and ensure safety compared with western medicine alone. Thus, this research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Shi-Hui, Luo, Liang, Liu, Xiang-Hong, Zhou, Yu-Ming, Liu, Hong-Ming, Huang, Zhen-Fei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010971
_version_ 1783331435861508096
author Xiao, Shi-Hui
Luo, Liang
Liu, Xiang-Hong
Zhou, Yu-Ming
Liu, Hong-Ming
Huang, Zhen-Fei
author_facet Xiao, Shi-Hui
Luo, Liang
Liu, Xiang-Hong
Zhou, Yu-Ming
Liu, Hong-Ming
Huang, Zhen-Fei
author_sort Xiao, Shi-Hui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a clinically critical disease. However, it is still controversial whether the combined use of traditional Chinese medicine Xuebijing injections (XBJI) and western medicine can enhance curative efficacy and ensure safety compared with western medicine alone. Thus, this research consisted of a systematic review of the curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine XBJI combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population. METHODS: A total of 8 databases were retrieved: 4 foreign databases, namely, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science; and 4 Chinese databases, namely, Sino Med, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and Wangfang Data. The time span of retrieval began from the establishment of each database and ended on August 1, 2017. Published randomized controlled trials about the combined use of traditional Chinese medicine XBJI and western medicine were included, regardless of language. Stata12.0 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Finally, 16 papers involving 1335 cases were included. The result of meta-analysis showed that compared with the single use of ulinastatin, traditional Chinese medicine XBJI combined with ulinastatin could reduce the time of mechanical ventilation, shorten the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, improve the 28-day survival rate, and decrease the occurrence rate of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, case fatality rate, procalcitonin (PCT) content, APACKEII score, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α level, and interleukin (IL)-6 level. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the common basic therapeutic regimen, the combined use of traditional Chinese medicine XBJI and ulinastatin was compared with the use of ulinastatin alone for treating sepsis in the Chinese population. It was found that the number of adverse events of combination therapy is not significantly increased, and its clinical safety is well within the permitted range. However, considering the limitations of this conclusion due to the low-quality articles included in the present research, it is necessary to conduct high-quality randomized controlled trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5999488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59994882018-06-20 Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis Xiao, Shi-Hui Luo, Liang Liu, Xiang-Hong Zhou, Yu-Ming Liu, Hong-Ming Huang, Zhen-Fei Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a clinically critical disease. However, it is still controversial whether the combined use of traditional Chinese medicine Xuebijing injections (XBJI) and western medicine can enhance curative efficacy and ensure safety compared with western medicine alone. Thus, this research consisted of a systematic review of the curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine XBJI combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population. METHODS: A total of 8 databases were retrieved: 4 foreign databases, namely, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science; and 4 Chinese databases, namely, Sino Med, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and Wangfang Data. The time span of retrieval began from the establishment of each database and ended on August 1, 2017. Published randomized controlled trials about the combined use of traditional Chinese medicine XBJI and western medicine were included, regardless of language. Stata12.0 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Finally, 16 papers involving 1335 cases were included. The result of meta-analysis showed that compared with the single use of ulinastatin, traditional Chinese medicine XBJI combined with ulinastatin could reduce the time of mechanical ventilation, shorten the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, improve the 28-day survival rate, and decrease the occurrence rate of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, case fatality rate, procalcitonin (PCT) content, APACKEII score, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α level, and interleukin (IL)-6 level. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the common basic therapeutic regimen, the combined use of traditional Chinese medicine XBJI and ulinastatin was compared with the use of ulinastatin alone for treating sepsis in the Chinese population. It was found that the number of adverse events of combination therapy is not significantly increased, and its clinical safety is well within the permitted range. However, considering the limitations of this conclusion due to the low-quality articles included in the present research, it is necessary to conduct high-quality randomized controlled trials. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5999488/ /pubmed/29879049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010971 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Xiao, Shi-Hui
Luo, Liang
Liu, Xiang-Hong
Zhou, Yu-Ming
Liu, Hong-Ming
Huang, Zhen-Fei
Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis
title Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis
title_full Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis
title_short Curative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the Chinese population: A meta-analysis
title_sort curative efficacy and safety of traditional chinese medicine xuebijing injections combined with ulinastatin for treating sepsis in the chinese population: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010971
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoshihui curativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesemedicinexuebijinginjectionscombinedwithulinastatinfortreatingsepsisinthechinesepopulationametaanalysis
AT luoliang curativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesemedicinexuebijinginjectionscombinedwithulinastatinfortreatingsepsisinthechinesepopulationametaanalysis
AT liuxianghong curativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesemedicinexuebijinginjectionscombinedwithulinastatinfortreatingsepsisinthechinesepopulationametaanalysis
AT zhouyuming curativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesemedicinexuebijinginjectionscombinedwithulinastatinfortreatingsepsisinthechinesepopulationametaanalysis
AT liuhongming curativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesemedicinexuebijinginjectionscombinedwithulinastatinfortreatingsepsisinthechinesepopulationametaanalysis
AT huangzhenfei curativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesemedicinexuebijinginjectionscombinedwithulinastatinfortreatingsepsisinthechinesepopulationametaanalysis