Cargando…

Using Clinical Data Standards to Measure Quality: A New Approach

Background  Value-based payment for care requires the consistent, objective calculation of care quality. Previous initiatives to calculate ambulatory quality measures have relied on billing data or individual electronic health records (EHRs) to calculate and report performance. New methods for quali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D'Amore, John D., Li, Chun, McCrary, Laura, Niloff, Jonathan M., Sittig, Dean F., McCoy, Allison B., Wright, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Schattauer GmbH 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29898468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1656548
_version_ 1783331443920863232
author D'Amore, John D.
Li, Chun
McCrary, Laura
Niloff, Jonathan M.
Sittig, Dean F.
McCoy, Allison B.
Wright, Adam
author_facet D'Amore, John D.
Li, Chun
McCrary, Laura
Niloff, Jonathan M.
Sittig, Dean F.
McCoy, Allison B.
Wright, Adam
author_sort D'Amore, John D.
collection PubMed
description Background  Value-based payment for care requires the consistent, objective calculation of care quality. Previous initiatives to calculate ambulatory quality measures have relied on billing data or individual electronic health records (EHRs) to calculate and report performance. New methods for quality measure calculation promoted by federal regulations allow qualified clinical data registries to report quality outcomes based on data aggregated across facilities and EHRs using interoperability standards. Objective  This research evaluates the use of clinical document interchange standards as the basis for quality measurement. Methods  Using data on 1,100 patients from 11 ambulatory care facilities and 5 different EHRs, challenges to quality measurement are identified and addressed for 17 certified quality measures. Results  Iterative solutions were identified for 14 measures that improved patient inclusion and measure calculation accuracy. Findings validate this approach to improving measure accuracy while maintaining measure certification. Conclusion  Organizations that report care quality should be aware of how identified issues affect quality measure selection and calculation. Quality measure authors should consider increasing real-world validation and the consistency of measure logic in respect to issues identified in this research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5999523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Schattauer GmbH
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59995232019-04-01 Using Clinical Data Standards to Measure Quality: A New Approach D'Amore, John D. Li, Chun McCrary, Laura Niloff, Jonathan M. Sittig, Dean F. McCoy, Allison B. Wright, Adam Appl Clin Inform Background  Value-based payment for care requires the consistent, objective calculation of care quality. Previous initiatives to calculate ambulatory quality measures have relied on billing data or individual electronic health records (EHRs) to calculate and report performance. New methods for quality measure calculation promoted by federal regulations allow qualified clinical data registries to report quality outcomes based on data aggregated across facilities and EHRs using interoperability standards. Objective  This research evaluates the use of clinical document interchange standards as the basis for quality measurement. Methods  Using data on 1,100 patients from 11 ambulatory care facilities and 5 different EHRs, challenges to quality measurement are identified and addressed for 17 certified quality measures. Results  Iterative solutions were identified for 14 measures that improved patient inclusion and measure calculation accuracy. Findings validate this approach to improving measure accuracy while maintaining measure certification. Conclusion  Organizations that report care quality should be aware of how identified issues affect quality measure selection and calculation. Quality measure authors should consider increasing real-world validation and the consistency of measure logic in respect to issues identified in this research. Schattauer GmbH 2018-04 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5999523/ /pubmed/29898468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1656548 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle D'Amore, John D.
Li, Chun
McCrary, Laura
Niloff, Jonathan M.
Sittig, Dean F.
McCoy, Allison B.
Wright, Adam
Using Clinical Data Standards to Measure Quality: A New Approach
title Using Clinical Data Standards to Measure Quality: A New Approach
title_full Using Clinical Data Standards to Measure Quality: A New Approach
title_fullStr Using Clinical Data Standards to Measure Quality: A New Approach
title_full_unstemmed Using Clinical Data Standards to Measure Quality: A New Approach
title_short Using Clinical Data Standards to Measure Quality: A New Approach
title_sort using clinical data standards to measure quality: a new approach
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29898468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1656548
work_keys_str_mv AT damorejohnd usingclinicaldatastandardstomeasurequalityanewapproach
AT lichun usingclinicaldatastandardstomeasurequalityanewapproach
AT mccrarylaura usingclinicaldatastandardstomeasurequalityanewapproach
AT niloffjonathanm usingclinicaldatastandardstomeasurequalityanewapproach
AT sittigdeanf usingclinicaldatastandardstomeasurequalityanewapproach
AT mccoyallisonb usingclinicaldatastandardstomeasurequalityanewapproach
AT wrightadam usingclinicaldatastandardstomeasurequalityanewapproach