Cargando…
吉非替尼治疗127例晚期复发非小细胞肺癌患者分类及回归树分析
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It has been proven that gefitinib produces only 10%-20% tumor regression in heavily pretreated, unselected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients as the second- and third-line setting. Asian, female, nonsmokers and adenocarcinoma are favorable factors; however, it is d...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
中国肺癌杂志编辑部
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21924034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.09.04 |
_version_ | 1783331451228389376 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It has been proven that gefitinib produces only 10%-20% tumor regression in heavily pretreated, unselected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients as the second- and third-line setting. Asian, female, nonsmokers and adenocarcinoma are favorable factors; however, it is difficult to find a patient satisfying all the above clinical characteristics. The aim of this study is to identify novel predicting factors, and to explore the interactions between clinical variables and their impact on the survival of Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC who were heavily treated with gefitinib in the second- or third-line setting. METHODS: The clinical and follow-up data of 127 advanced NSCLC patients referred to the Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from March 2005 to March 2010 were analyzed. Multivariate analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) was performed using recursive partitioning, which is referred to as the classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. RESULTS: The median PFS of 127 eligible consecutive advanced NSCLC patients was 8.0 months (95%CI: 5.8-10.2). CART was performed with an initial split on first-line chemotherapy outcomes and a second split on patients' age. Three terminal subgroups were formed. The median PFS of the three subsets ranged from 1.0 month (95%CI: 0.8-1.2) for those with progressive disease outcome after the first-line chemotherapy subgroup, 10 months (95%CI: 7.0-13.0) in patients with a partial response or stable disease in first-line chemotherapy and age < 70, and 22.0 months for patients obtaining a partial response or stable disease in first-line chemotherapy at age 70-81 (95%CI: 3.8-40.1). CONCLUSION: Partial response, stable disease in first-line chemotherapy and age ≥ 70 are closely correlated with long-term survival treated by gefitinib as a second- or third-line setting in advanced NSCLC. CART can be used to identify previously unappreciated patient subsets and is a useful method for dissecting complex clinical situations. Moreover, CART can be used to identify homogeneous patient populations in clinical practice and future clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5999611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59996112018-07-06 吉非替尼治疗127例晚期复发非小细胞肺癌患者分类及回归树分析 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It has been proven that gefitinib produces only 10%-20% tumor regression in heavily pretreated, unselected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients as the second- and third-line setting. Asian, female, nonsmokers and adenocarcinoma are favorable factors; however, it is difficult to find a patient satisfying all the above clinical characteristics. The aim of this study is to identify novel predicting factors, and to explore the interactions between clinical variables and their impact on the survival of Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC who were heavily treated with gefitinib in the second- or third-line setting. METHODS: The clinical and follow-up data of 127 advanced NSCLC patients referred to the Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from March 2005 to March 2010 were analyzed. Multivariate analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) was performed using recursive partitioning, which is referred to as the classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. RESULTS: The median PFS of 127 eligible consecutive advanced NSCLC patients was 8.0 months (95%CI: 5.8-10.2). CART was performed with an initial split on first-line chemotherapy outcomes and a second split on patients' age. Three terminal subgroups were formed. The median PFS of the three subsets ranged from 1.0 month (95%CI: 0.8-1.2) for those with progressive disease outcome after the first-line chemotherapy subgroup, 10 months (95%CI: 7.0-13.0) in patients with a partial response or stable disease in first-line chemotherapy and age < 70, and 22.0 months for patients obtaining a partial response or stable disease in first-line chemotherapy at age 70-81 (95%CI: 3.8-40.1). CONCLUSION: Partial response, stable disease in first-line chemotherapy and age ≥ 70 are closely correlated with long-term survival treated by gefitinib as a second- or third-line setting in advanced NSCLC. CART can be used to identify previously unappreciated patient subsets and is a useful method for dissecting complex clinical situations. Moreover, CART can be used to identify homogeneous patient populations in clinical practice and future clinical trials. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2011-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5999611/ /pubmed/21924034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.09.04 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | 临床研究 吉非替尼治疗127例晚期复发非小细胞肺癌患者分类及回归树分析 |
title | 吉非替尼治疗127例晚期复发非小细胞肺癌患者分类及回归树分析 |
title_full | 吉非替尼治疗127例晚期复发非小细胞肺癌患者分类及回归树分析 |
title_fullStr | 吉非替尼治疗127例晚期复发非小细胞肺癌患者分类及回归树分析 |
title_full_unstemmed | 吉非替尼治疗127例晚期复发非小细胞肺癌患者分类及回归树分析 |
title_short | 吉非替尼治疗127例晚期复发非小细胞肺癌患者分类及回归树分析 |
title_sort | 吉非替尼治疗127例晚期复发非小细胞肺癌患者分类及回归树分析 |
topic | 临床研究 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21924034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.09.04 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jífēitìnízhìliáo127lìwǎnqīfùfāfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáihuànzhěfēnlèijíhuíguīshùfēnxī AT jífēitìnízhìliáo127lìwǎnqīfùfāfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáihuànzhěfēnlèijíhuíguīshùfēnxī AT jífēitìnízhìliáo127lìwǎnqīfùfāfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáihuànzhěfēnlèijíhuíguīshùfēnxī AT jífēitìnízhìliáo127lìwǎnqīfùfāfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáihuànzhěfēnlèijíhuíguīshùfēnxī AT jífēitìnízhìliáo127lìwǎnqīfùfāfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáihuànzhěfēnlèijíhuíguīshùfēnxī |