Cargando…

Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search

BACKGROUND: Radiological techniques for breast cancer detection are undergoing a massive technological shift—moving from mammography, a process that takes a two-dimensional (2D) image of breast tissue, to tomosynthesis, a technique that creates a segmented-three-dimensional (3D) image. There are dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adamo, Stephen H., Ericson, Justin M., Nah, Joseph C., Brem, Rachel, Mitroff, Stephen R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0103-x
_version_ 1783331479022993408
author Adamo, Stephen H.
Ericson, Justin M.
Nah, Joseph C.
Brem, Rachel
Mitroff, Stephen R.
author_facet Adamo, Stephen H.
Ericson, Justin M.
Nah, Joseph C.
Brem, Rachel
Mitroff, Stephen R.
author_sort Adamo, Stephen H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radiological techniques for breast cancer detection are undergoing a massive technological shift—moving from mammography, a process that takes a two-dimensional (2D) image of breast tissue, to tomosynthesis, a technique that creates a segmented-three-dimensional (3D) image. There are distinct benefits of tomosynthesis over mammography with radiologists having fewer false positives and more accurate detections; yet there is a significant and meaningful disadvantage with tomosynthesis in that it takes longer to evaluate each patient. This added time can dramatically impact workflow and have negative attentional and cognitive impacts on interpretation of medical images. To better understand the nature of segmented-3D visual search and the implications for radiology, the current study looked to establish a new testing platform that could reliably examine differences between 2D and segmented-3D search. RESULTS: In Experiment 1, both professionals (radiology residents and certified radiologists) and non-professionals (undergraduate students) were found to have fewer false positives and were more accurate in segmented-3D displays, but at the cost of taking significantly longer in search. Experiment 2 tested a second group of non-professional participants, using a background that more closely resembled a mammogram, and replicated the results of Experiment 1—search was more accurate and there were fewer false alarms in segmented 3D displays but took more time. CONCLUSION: The results of Experiments 1 and 2 matched the performance patterns found in previous radiology studies and in the clinic, suggesting this novel experimental paradigm potentially provides a flexible and cost-effective tool that can be utilized with non-professional populations to inform relevant visual search performance. From an academic perspective, this paradigm holds promise for examining the nature of segmented-3D visual search.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5999688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59996882018-06-28 Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search Adamo, Stephen H. Ericson, Justin M. Nah, Joseph C. Brem, Rachel Mitroff, Stephen R. Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article BACKGROUND: Radiological techniques for breast cancer detection are undergoing a massive technological shift—moving from mammography, a process that takes a two-dimensional (2D) image of breast tissue, to tomosynthesis, a technique that creates a segmented-three-dimensional (3D) image. There are distinct benefits of tomosynthesis over mammography with radiologists having fewer false positives and more accurate detections; yet there is a significant and meaningful disadvantage with tomosynthesis in that it takes longer to evaluate each patient. This added time can dramatically impact workflow and have negative attentional and cognitive impacts on interpretation of medical images. To better understand the nature of segmented-3D visual search and the implications for radiology, the current study looked to establish a new testing platform that could reliably examine differences between 2D and segmented-3D search. RESULTS: In Experiment 1, both professionals (radiology residents and certified radiologists) and non-professionals (undergraduate students) were found to have fewer false positives and were more accurate in segmented-3D displays, but at the cost of taking significantly longer in search. Experiment 2 tested a second group of non-professional participants, using a background that more closely resembled a mammogram, and replicated the results of Experiment 1—search was more accurate and there were fewer false alarms in segmented 3D displays but took more time. CONCLUSION: The results of Experiments 1 and 2 matched the performance patterns found in previous radiology studies and in the clinic, suggesting this novel experimental paradigm potentially provides a flexible and cost-effective tool that can be utilized with non-professional populations to inform relevant visual search performance. From an academic perspective, this paradigm holds promise for examining the nature of segmented-3D visual search. Springer International Publishing 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5999688/ /pubmed/29963605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0103-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Adamo, Stephen H.
Ericson, Justin M.
Nah, Joseph C.
Brem, Rachel
Mitroff, Stephen R.
Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search
title Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search
title_full Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search
title_fullStr Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search
title_full_unstemmed Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search
title_short Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search
title_sort mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0103-x
work_keys_str_mv AT adamostephenh mammographytotomosynthesisexaminingthedifferencesbetweentwodimensionalandsegmentedthreedimensionalvisualsearch
AT ericsonjustinm mammographytotomosynthesisexaminingthedifferencesbetweentwodimensionalandsegmentedthreedimensionalvisualsearch
AT nahjosephc mammographytotomosynthesisexaminingthedifferencesbetweentwodimensionalandsegmentedthreedimensionalvisualsearch
AT bremrachel mammographytotomosynthesisexaminingthedifferencesbetweentwodimensionalandsegmentedthreedimensionalvisualsearch
AT mitroffstephenr mammographytotomosynthesisexaminingthedifferencesbetweentwodimensionalandsegmentedthreedimensionalvisualsearch