Cargando…
培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Whether pemetrexed plus platinum (PP) regimen is superior to gemcitabine plus platinum (GP) regimen for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efcacy and safety of PP versus GP regimens for patients wit...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
中国肺癌杂志编辑部
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21219831 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.01.09 |
_version_ | 1783331481152651264 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Whether pemetrexed plus platinum (PP) regimen is superior to gemcitabine plus platinum (GP) regimen for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efcacy and safety of PP versus GP regimens for patients with NSCLC. METHODS: We searched relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Scientifc Journals Full-text Database, and traced the related references to obtain the information that has not been found. We made quality assessment of qualifed RCTs assessed by the exclusion and inclusion criteria and used RevMan 5.0 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration to perform meta-analysis. RESULTS: Four RCTs involving 2, 235 patients were identifed. Tere were no statistical differences between PP and GP regimens in one-year survival rate (OR=1.09, 95%CI: 0.91-1.29), the efciency of disease (OR=1.00, 95%CI: 0.40-2.52), but overall survival (MD=0.26, 95%CI: 0.21-0.30), alopecia (OR=0.51, 95%CI: 0.39-0.66) and hematologic toxicity were signifcantly different. CONCLUSION: The clinical efciency of PP and GP regimens for advanced NSCLC was similar, but the side effects were different. The toxicity of PP regimen has the tendency to be more tolerable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5999694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59996942018-07-06 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Whether pemetrexed plus platinum (PP) regimen is superior to gemcitabine plus platinum (GP) regimen for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efcacy and safety of PP versus GP regimens for patients with NSCLC. METHODS: We searched relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Scientifc Journals Full-text Database, and traced the related references to obtain the information that has not been found. We made quality assessment of qualifed RCTs assessed by the exclusion and inclusion criteria and used RevMan 5.0 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration to perform meta-analysis. RESULTS: Four RCTs involving 2, 235 patients were identifed. Tere were no statistical differences between PP and GP regimens in one-year survival rate (OR=1.09, 95%CI: 0.91-1.29), the efciency of disease (OR=1.00, 95%CI: 0.40-2.52), but overall survival (MD=0.26, 95%CI: 0.21-0.30), alopecia (OR=0.51, 95%CI: 0.39-0.66) and hematologic toxicity were signifcantly different. CONCLUSION: The clinical efciency of PP and GP regimens for advanced NSCLC was similar, but the side effects were different. The toxicity of PP regimen has the tendency to be more tolerable. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2011-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5999694/ /pubmed/21219831 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.01.09 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | 临床研究 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析 |
title | 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析 |
title_full | 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析 |
title_fullStr | 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析 |
title_full_unstemmed | 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析 |
title_short | 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析 |
title_sort | 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析 |
topic | 临床研究 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21219831 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.01.09 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT péiměiqūsāiliánhébólèiduìbǐjíxītābīnliánhébólèizhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidemetafēnxī AT péiměiqūsāiliánhébólèiduìbǐjíxītābīnliánhébólèizhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidemetafēnxī AT péiměiqūsāiliánhébólèiduìbǐjíxītābīnliánhébólèizhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidemetafēnxī AT péiměiqūsāiliánhébólèiduìbǐjíxītābīnliánhébólèizhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidemetafēnxī AT péiměiqūsāiliánhébólèiduìbǐjíxītābīnliánhébólèizhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidemetafēnxī AT péiměiqūsāiliánhébólèiduìbǐjíxītābīnliánhébólèizhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidemetafēnxī |