Cargando…

培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Whether pemetrexed plus platinum (PP) regimen is superior to gemcitabine plus platinum (GP) regimen for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efcacy and safety of PP versus GP regimens for patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21219831
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.01.09
_version_ 1783331481152651264
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Whether pemetrexed plus platinum (PP) regimen is superior to gemcitabine plus platinum (GP) regimen for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efcacy and safety of PP versus GP regimens for patients with NSCLC. METHODS: We searched relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Scientifc Journals Full-text Database, and traced the related references to obtain the information that has not been found. We made quality assessment of qualifed RCTs assessed by the exclusion and inclusion criteria and used RevMan 5.0 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration to perform meta-analysis. RESULTS: Four RCTs involving 2, 235 patients were identifed. Tere were no statistical differences between PP and GP regimens in one-year survival rate (OR=1.09, 95%CI: 0.91-1.29), the efciency of disease (OR=1.00, 95%CI: 0.40-2.52), but overall survival (MD=0.26, 95%CI: 0.21-0.30), alopecia (OR=0.51, 95%CI: 0.39-0.66) and hematologic toxicity were signifcantly different. CONCLUSION: The clinical efciency of PP and GP regimens for advanced NSCLC was similar, but the side effects were different. The toxicity of PP regimen has the tendency to be more tolerable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5999694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher 中国肺癌杂志编辑部
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59996942018-07-06 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Whether pemetrexed plus platinum (PP) regimen is superior to gemcitabine plus platinum (GP) regimen for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efcacy and safety of PP versus GP regimens for patients with NSCLC. METHODS: We searched relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Scientifc Journals Full-text Database, and traced the related references to obtain the information that has not been found. We made quality assessment of qualifed RCTs assessed by the exclusion and inclusion criteria and used RevMan 5.0 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration to perform meta-analysis. RESULTS: Four RCTs involving 2, 235 patients were identifed. Tere were no statistical differences between PP and GP regimens in one-year survival rate (OR=1.09, 95%CI: 0.91-1.29), the efciency of disease (OR=1.00, 95%CI: 0.40-2.52), but overall survival (MD=0.26, 95%CI: 0.21-0.30), alopecia (OR=0.51, 95%CI: 0.39-0.66) and hematologic toxicity were signifcantly different. CONCLUSION: The clinical efciency of PP and GP regimens for advanced NSCLC was similar, but the side effects were different. The toxicity of PP regimen has the tendency to be more tolerable. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2011-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5999694/ /pubmed/21219831 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.01.09 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle 临床研究
培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析
title 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析
title_full 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析
title_fullStr 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析
title_full_unstemmed 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析
title_short 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析
title_sort 培美曲塞联合铂类对比吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的meta分析
topic 临床研究
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21219831
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.01.09
work_keys_str_mv AT péiměiqūsāiliánhébólèiduìbǐjíxītābīnliánhébólèizhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidemetafēnxī
AT péiměiqūsāiliánhébólèiduìbǐjíxītābīnliánhébólèizhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidemetafēnxī
AT péiměiqūsāiliánhébólèiduìbǐjíxītābīnliánhébólèizhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidemetafēnxī
AT péiměiqūsāiliánhébólèiduìbǐjíxītābīnliánhébólèizhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidemetafēnxī
AT péiměiqūsāiliánhébólèiduìbǐjíxītābīnliánhébólèizhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidemetafēnxī
AT péiměiqūsāiliánhébólèiduìbǐjíxītābīnliánhébólèizhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidemetafēnxī