Cargando…

紫杉醇脂质体诱导加同期放化疗与序贯放化疗治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机对照研究

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sequential and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were widely studied in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the reports of induction chemotherapy followed concurrent chemoradiotherapy are rare so far. The little side effects of paclitaxel liposme may be conv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21342644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.02.06
_version_ 1783331506445352960
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sequential and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were widely studied in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the reports of induction chemotherapy followed concurrent chemoradiotherapy are rare so far. The little side effects of paclitaxel liposme may be convenient to carry out induction chemotherapy followed concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The aim of this study is to compare the effects and side effects of TP regimen (Paclitaxel liposme and cisplatin) induction chemotherapy followed concurrent chemoradiotherapy with sequential radiotherapy on locally advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Sixty locally advanced NSCLC patients were randomly divided into group A, induction chemotherapy followed concurrent chemoradiotherapy and group B, sequential radiotherapy group. The patients in group A received 2-3 cycles of induced chemotherapy included of Paclitaxel liposme 135 mg/m(2)-175 mg/m(2), d1 and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2)-80 mg/m(2), d2, 3 weeks repeat and after 2-3 cycles followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The patients in group B received chemotherapy, (as described above in group A) 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy followed one cycle of radiotherapy. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy at the total dose of 56 Gy-70 Gy was applied in all patients. RESULTS: The response rate in group A and group B were 80.3% and 60%, respectively (P=0.042). 1-year survival rates were 71.4% and 53.2%, respectively (P=0.18). And there were no significant difference of myelosuppression, radiation esophagitis and pulmonary fibrosis between the two groups (P=0.09, P=0.147, P=0.276, respectively). CONCLUSION: The recent effects of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy group were better than sequential radiotherapy group on locally advanced NSCLC and there was no significant difference in side effects between the two groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5999775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher 中国肺癌杂志编辑部
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59997752018-07-06 紫杉醇脂质体诱导加同期放化疗与序贯放化疗治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机对照研究 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sequential and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were widely studied in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the reports of induction chemotherapy followed concurrent chemoradiotherapy are rare so far. The little side effects of paclitaxel liposme may be convenient to carry out induction chemotherapy followed concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The aim of this study is to compare the effects and side effects of TP regimen (Paclitaxel liposme and cisplatin) induction chemotherapy followed concurrent chemoradiotherapy with sequential radiotherapy on locally advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Sixty locally advanced NSCLC patients were randomly divided into group A, induction chemotherapy followed concurrent chemoradiotherapy and group B, sequential radiotherapy group. The patients in group A received 2-3 cycles of induced chemotherapy included of Paclitaxel liposme 135 mg/m(2)-175 mg/m(2), d1 and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2)-80 mg/m(2), d2, 3 weeks repeat and after 2-3 cycles followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The patients in group B received chemotherapy, (as described above in group A) 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy followed one cycle of radiotherapy. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy at the total dose of 56 Gy-70 Gy was applied in all patients. RESULTS: The response rate in group A and group B were 80.3% and 60%, respectively (P=0.042). 1-year survival rates were 71.4% and 53.2%, respectively (P=0.18). And there were no significant difference of myelosuppression, radiation esophagitis and pulmonary fibrosis between the two groups (P=0.09, P=0.147, P=0.276, respectively). CONCLUSION: The recent effects of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy group were better than sequential radiotherapy group on locally advanced NSCLC and there was no significant difference in side effects between the two groups. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2011-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5999775/ /pubmed/21342644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.02.06 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle 临床研究
紫杉醇脂质体诱导加同期放化疗与序贯放化疗治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机对照研究
title 紫杉醇脂质体诱导加同期放化疗与序贯放化疗治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机对照研究
title_full 紫杉醇脂质体诱导加同期放化疗与序贯放化疗治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机对照研究
title_fullStr 紫杉醇脂质体诱导加同期放化疗与序贯放化疗治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机对照研究
title_full_unstemmed 紫杉醇脂质体诱导加同期放化疗与序贯放化疗治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机对照研究
title_short 紫杉醇脂质体诱导加同期放化疗与序贯放化疗治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机对照研究
title_sort 紫杉醇脂质体诱导加同期放化疗与序贯放化疗治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机对照研究
topic 临床研究
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21342644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.02.06
work_keys_str_mv AT zǐshānchúnzhīzhìtǐyòudǎojiātóngqīfànghuàliáoyǔxùguànfànghuàliáozhìliáojúbùwǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidesuíjīduìzhàoyánjiū
AT zǐshānchúnzhīzhìtǐyòudǎojiātóngqīfànghuàliáoyǔxùguànfànghuàliáozhìliáojúbùwǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidesuíjīduìzhàoyánjiū
AT zǐshānchúnzhīzhìtǐyòudǎojiātóngqīfànghuàliáoyǔxùguànfànghuàliáozhìliáojúbùwǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidesuíjīduìzhàoyánjiū
AT zǐshānchúnzhīzhìtǐyòudǎojiātóngqīfànghuàliáoyǔxùguànfànghuàliáozhìliáojúbùwǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidesuíjīduìzhàoyánjiū