Cargando…

埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of icotinib with standard second-line chemotherapy (single-agent docetaxel or pemetrexed) in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients treated with icotinib and 33 con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26104894
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2015.06.07
_version_ 1783331553565212672
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of icotinib with standard second-line chemotherapy (single-agent docetaxel or pemetrexed) in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients treated with icotinib and 33 consecutive patients treated with standard second-line chemotherapy in Xuanwu Hospital from January 2012 to July 2013 were enrolled in our retrospective research. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors were used to evaluate the tumor responses, and the progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Icotinib was comparable with standard second-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in terms of overall response rate (ORR) (28.1% vs 18.2%, P=0.341), disease control rate (DFS)(43.8% vs 45.5%, P=0.890), and PFS (4.3 months vs 3.8 months, P=0.506). In the icotinib group, the ORR of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant was significantly higher than that of EGFR unknown or wild type (P=0.017). In multivariate analysis, age, gender, histology, and the optimum first-line treatment response were dependent prognostic factors based on the PFS of the icotinib group. The incidence of adverse events was significantly fewer in the icotinib group than in the chemotherapy group (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the standard second-line chemotherapy, icotinib is active in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients, especially with EGFR unknown in the second line, with an acceptable adverse event profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5999914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher 中国肺癌杂志编辑部
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59999142018-07-06 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of icotinib with standard second-line chemotherapy (single-agent docetaxel or pemetrexed) in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients treated with icotinib and 33 consecutive patients treated with standard second-line chemotherapy in Xuanwu Hospital from January 2012 to July 2013 were enrolled in our retrospective research. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors were used to evaluate the tumor responses, and the progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Icotinib was comparable with standard second-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in terms of overall response rate (ORR) (28.1% vs 18.2%, P=0.341), disease control rate (DFS)(43.8% vs 45.5%, P=0.890), and PFS (4.3 months vs 3.8 months, P=0.506). In the icotinib group, the ORR of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant was significantly higher than that of EGFR unknown or wild type (P=0.017). In multivariate analysis, age, gender, histology, and the optimum first-line treatment response were dependent prognostic factors based on the PFS of the icotinib group. The incidence of adverse events was significantly fewer in the icotinib group than in the chemotherapy group (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the standard second-line chemotherapy, icotinib is active in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients, especially with EGFR unknown in the second line, with an acceptable adverse event profile. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2015-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5999914/ /pubmed/26104894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2015.06.07 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle 临床研究
埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察
title 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察
title_full 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察
title_fullStr 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察
title_full_unstemmed 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察
title_short 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察
title_sort 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察
topic 临床研究
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26104894
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2015.06.07
work_keys_str_mv AT āikètìníduìbǐbiāozhǔnèrxiànhuàliáozhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángguānchá
AT āikètìníduìbǐbiāozhǔnèrxiànhuàliáozhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángguānchá
AT āikètìníduìbǐbiāozhǔnèrxiànhuàliáozhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángguānchá
AT āikètìníduìbǐbiāozhǔnèrxiànhuàliáozhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángguānchá
AT āikètìníduìbǐbiāozhǔnèrxiànhuàliáozhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángguānchá