Cargando…
埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of icotinib with standard second-line chemotherapy (single-agent docetaxel or pemetrexed) in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients treated with icotinib and 33 con...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
中国肺癌杂志编辑部
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26104894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2015.06.07 |
_version_ | 1783331553565212672 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of icotinib with standard second-line chemotherapy (single-agent docetaxel or pemetrexed) in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients treated with icotinib and 33 consecutive patients treated with standard second-line chemotherapy in Xuanwu Hospital from January 2012 to July 2013 were enrolled in our retrospective research. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors were used to evaluate the tumor responses, and the progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Icotinib was comparable with standard second-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in terms of overall response rate (ORR) (28.1% vs 18.2%, P=0.341), disease control rate (DFS)(43.8% vs 45.5%, P=0.890), and PFS (4.3 months vs 3.8 months, P=0.506). In the icotinib group, the ORR of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant was significantly higher than that of EGFR unknown or wild type (P=0.017). In multivariate analysis, age, gender, histology, and the optimum first-line treatment response were dependent prognostic factors based on the PFS of the icotinib group. The incidence of adverse events was significantly fewer in the icotinib group than in the chemotherapy group (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the standard second-line chemotherapy, icotinib is active in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients, especially with EGFR unknown in the second line, with an acceptable adverse event profile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5999914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59999142018-07-06 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of icotinib with standard second-line chemotherapy (single-agent docetaxel or pemetrexed) in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients treated with icotinib and 33 consecutive patients treated with standard second-line chemotherapy in Xuanwu Hospital from January 2012 to July 2013 were enrolled in our retrospective research. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors were used to evaluate the tumor responses, and the progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Icotinib was comparable with standard second-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in terms of overall response rate (ORR) (28.1% vs 18.2%, P=0.341), disease control rate (DFS)(43.8% vs 45.5%, P=0.890), and PFS (4.3 months vs 3.8 months, P=0.506). In the icotinib group, the ORR of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant was significantly higher than that of EGFR unknown or wild type (P=0.017). In multivariate analysis, age, gender, histology, and the optimum first-line treatment response were dependent prognostic factors based on the PFS of the icotinib group. The incidence of adverse events was significantly fewer in the icotinib group than in the chemotherapy group (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the standard second-line chemotherapy, icotinib is active in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients, especially with EGFR unknown in the second line, with an acceptable adverse event profile. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2015-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5999914/ /pubmed/26104894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2015.06.07 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | 临床研究 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察 |
title | 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察 |
title_full | 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察 |
title_fullStr | 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察 |
title_full_unstemmed | 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察 |
title_short | 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察 |
title_sort | 埃克替尼对比标准二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察 |
topic | 临床研究 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26104894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2015.06.07 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT āikètìníduìbǐbiāozhǔnèrxiànhuàliáozhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángguānchá AT āikètìníduìbǐbiāozhǔnèrxiànhuàliáozhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángguānchá AT āikètìníduìbǐbiāozhǔnèrxiànhuàliáozhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángguānchá AT āikètìníduìbǐbiāozhǔnèrxiànhuàliáozhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángguānchá AT āikètìníduìbǐbiāozhǔnèrxiànhuàliáozhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángguānchá |