Cargando…

不同室间隔形态肺高血压患者的心室功能特点:CMR初步研究

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To study the characteristics of ventricular function in Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) Patients with different shape of Interventricular Septum (IVS) by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: 36 PH patients diagnosed by right heart catheterization accepted CMR. According t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.05.07
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To study the characteristics of ventricular function in Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) Patients with different shape of Interventricular Septum (IVS) by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: 36 PH patients diagnosed by right heart catheterization accepted CMR. According to the morphology of IVS, the patients were divided into two groups: the non-deformation group (10 patients) and the deformation group (26 patients). The ventricular function parameters were as follows: RV and LV end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), end-systolic volume index (ESVI), stroke volume index (SVI), cardiac index (CI), ejection fraction (EF), and myocardial mass index (MMI). RESULTS: ANOVA analysis showed that the differences of RVEDVI, RVESVI, RVSVI, RVCI, RVEF, RVMMI, LVEDVI, LVESVI, LVSVI and LVCI were significant among the three groups. Compared with control group, RVSVI (P=0.017), RVEF (P < 0.001), LVEDVI (P=0.048) and LVSVI (P=0.015) decreased in IVS non-deformation group. Compared with IVS non-deformation group, RVEDVI (P < 0.001), RVESVI (P < 0.001), RVCI (P=0.002) and RVMMI (P=0.017) were increased in IVS deformation group; while RVEF (P=0.001), LVEDVI (P=0.003), LVSVI (P < 0.001) and LVCI (P=0.029) were decreased. Compared with the control group, RVEDVI (P < 0.001), RVESVI (P < 0.001), RVCI (P=0.004) and RVMMI (P=0.003) were increased in the IVS deformation group, while RVEF (P < 0.001), LVEDVI (P < 0.001), LVESVI (P < 0.001), LVSVI (P < 0.001), LVCI (P < 0.001) were decreased. CONCLUSION: Ventricular function is different in PH Patients with different IVS shape. The IVS shape can represent the changes of ventricular function in PH patients.