Cargando…
重组人血管内皮抑制素静脉持续泵入联合窗口期动脉灌注化疗治疗晚期肺鳞癌的临床观察
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in China. The aim of this study is to observe the efficacy and safety of recombinant human vascular endostatin (endostar) durative transfusion combined with window period arterial infusion chemotherapy in the treatment...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
中国肺癌杂志编辑部
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6000236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26302347 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2015.08.05 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in China. The aim of this study is to observe the efficacy and safety of recombinant human vascular endostatin (endostar) durative transfusion combined with window period arterial infusion chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced lung squamous carcinoma. METHODS: From February 2014 to January 2015, 10 cases of the cytological or histological pathology diagnosed stage Ⅲb -stage Ⅳ lung squamous carcinoma were treated with recombinant human vascular endostatin (30 mg/d) durative transfusion combined with window period arterial infusion chemotherapy. Over the same period of 10 cases stage Ⅲb -stage Ⅳ lung squamous carcinoma patients for pure arterial perfusion chemotherapy were compared. Recombinant human vascular endostatin was durative transfused every 24 hours for 7 days in combination group, and in the 4(th) day of window period, the 10 patients were received artery infusion chemotherapy, using docetaxel combined with cisplatin. Pure treatment group received the same arterial perfusion chemotherapy regimen. 4 weeks was a cycle. 4 weeks after 2 cycles, to evaluate the short-term effects and the adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: 2 groups of patients were received 2 cycles treatments. The response rate (RR) was 70.0%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 90.0% in the combination group; In the pure treatment group were 50.0%, 70.0% respectively, there were no statistically significant difference (P=0.650, 0.582). The adverse reactions of the treatment were mild, including level 1-2 of gastrointestinal reaction and blood toxicity, there were no statistically significant difference (P=0.999, P=0.628). In the combination group, 1 patient occurred level 1 of cardiac toxicity. CONCLUSION: Recombinant human vascular endostatin durative transfusion combined with window period arterial infusion chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced lung squamous carcinoma could take a significant curative effect, and the patients were well tolerated by the mild adverse reactions. |
---|