Cargando…
拓扑替康用于小细胞肺癌维持/巩固治疗和挽救治疗的疗效比较
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: How to prolong progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been one of the hottest issues. We retrospectively reviewed our data to compare the survival of immediate with delayed topotecan after first-line ther...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
中国肺癌杂志编辑部
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6000537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20673518 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2010.03.05 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: How to prolong progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been one of the hottest issues. We retrospectively reviewed our data to compare the survival of immediate with delayed topotecan after first-line therapy in SCLC. METHODS: In our retrospective study, 53 patients with SCLC were divided into two groups as follow: patients receiving topotecan-containing regimen as maintenance/ consolidation (maintenance/consolidation chemotherapy group) and salvage chemotherapy (salvage chemotherapy group). The Log-rank test was used to assess the difference in OS between two groups. Cox regression model was used for the multivari- able analysis of independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients received topotecan as maintenance/consolida- tion treatment, whereas 24 patients salvage chemotherapy. The response rates were 51.7% and 41.7%, respectively. The median survival time were 20 months and 27 months respectively (P=0.89). Multivariate Cox regression analyses identified sex and stage as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Efficacy of first-line therapy was improved by topotecan maintenance/ consolidation treatment, which did not result in any significant survival benefits in SCLC. |
---|