Cargando…
晚期EGFR突变型非小细胞肺癌患者接受吉非替尼或厄洛替尼治疗的成本效益分析
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) had become a research hotspot.Both of gefitinib and erlotinib had already been recommended as first line treatment in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant advanced NSCLC patients.The study aimed to compare the...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
中国肺癌杂志编辑部
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6000588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23601301 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2013.04.06 |
_version_ | 1783331779196747776 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) had become a research hotspot.Both of gefitinib and erlotinib had already been recommended as first line treatment in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant advanced NSCLC patients.The study aimed to compare the effectiveness and prognosis of advanced NSCLC with gefitinib or erlotinib, as well as the cost-effectiveness ratio of the two drugs. METHODS: Data of 66 EGFR mutant NSCLC patients who were included in Guangzhou medical insurance were analyzed.The efficacy and adverse reactions were evaluated.All the patients were followed-up regularly and the cost of the treatment was recorded. RESULTS: The median progression free survival (PFS) of all patients was 15.0 months.49 patients received gefintib and 17 patients had erlotinib.The PFS for the two groups of patients was 17.5 month and 13 months, respectively (P=0.459).31 (62.3%) patients had rash in gefitinib group, 16 (94.1%) in erlotinib group.Cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) in gefitinib group was 3, 027 RMB per month, while 6, 800 RMB in erlotinib group.The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICEA) of erlotinib was 2.25 times of gefitinib. CONCLUSION: For EGFR mutant advanced NSCLC patients, equal efficacy and survival benefit were observed in patients with gefitinib and erlotinib.The adverse reaction was milder in gefitinib group than that of erlotinib group.And with Guangzhou medical insurance, gefitinib had a superior cost-effectiveness ratio. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6000588 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60005882018-07-06 晚期EGFR突变型非小细胞肺癌患者接受吉非替尼或厄洛替尼治疗的成本效益分析 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床经验 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) had become a research hotspot.Both of gefitinib and erlotinib had already been recommended as first line treatment in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant advanced NSCLC patients.The study aimed to compare the effectiveness and prognosis of advanced NSCLC with gefitinib or erlotinib, as well as the cost-effectiveness ratio of the two drugs. METHODS: Data of 66 EGFR mutant NSCLC patients who were included in Guangzhou medical insurance were analyzed.The efficacy and adverse reactions were evaluated.All the patients were followed-up regularly and the cost of the treatment was recorded. RESULTS: The median progression free survival (PFS) of all patients was 15.0 months.49 patients received gefintib and 17 patients had erlotinib.The PFS for the two groups of patients was 17.5 month and 13 months, respectively (P=0.459).31 (62.3%) patients had rash in gefitinib group, 16 (94.1%) in erlotinib group.Cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) in gefitinib group was 3, 027 RMB per month, while 6, 800 RMB in erlotinib group.The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICEA) of erlotinib was 2.25 times of gefitinib. CONCLUSION: For EGFR mutant advanced NSCLC patients, equal efficacy and survival benefit were observed in patients with gefitinib and erlotinib.The adverse reaction was milder in gefitinib group than that of erlotinib group.And with Guangzhou medical insurance, gefitinib had a superior cost-effectiveness ratio. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2013-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6000588/ /pubmed/23601301 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2013.04.06 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | 临床经验 晚期EGFR突变型非小细胞肺癌患者接受吉非替尼或厄洛替尼治疗的成本效益分析 |
title | 晚期EGFR突变型非小细胞肺癌患者接受吉非替尼或厄洛替尼治疗的成本效益分析 |
title_full | 晚期EGFR突变型非小细胞肺癌患者接受吉非替尼或厄洛替尼治疗的成本效益分析 |
title_fullStr | 晚期EGFR突变型非小细胞肺癌患者接受吉非替尼或厄洛替尼治疗的成本效益分析 |
title_full_unstemmed | 晚期EGFR突变型非小细胞肺癌患者接受吉非替尼或厄洛替尼治疗的成本效益分析 |
title_short | 晚期EGFR突变型非小细胞肺癌患者接受吉非替尼或厄洛替尼治疗的成本效益分析 |
title_sort | 晚期egfr突变型非小细胞肺癌患者接受吉非替尼或厄洛替尼治疗的成本效益分析 |
topic | 临床经验 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6000588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23601301 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2013.04.06 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wǎnqīegfrtūbiànxíngfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáihuànzhějiēshòujífēitìníhuòèluòtìnízhìliáodechéngběnxiàoyìfēnxī AT wǎnqīegfrtūbiànxíngfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáihuànzhějiēshòujífēitìníhuòèluòtìnízhìliáodechéngběnxiàoyìfēnxī AT wǎnqīegfrtūbiànxíngfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáihuànzhějiēshòujífēitìníhuòèluòtìnízhìliáodechéngběnxiàoyìfēnxī AT wǎnqīegfrtūbiànxíngfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáihuànzhějiēshòujífēitìníhuòèluòtìnízhìliáodechéngběnxiàoyìfēnxī AT wǎnqīegfrtūbiànxíngfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáihuànzhějiēshòujífēitìníhuòèluòtìnízhìliáodechéngběnxiàoyìfēnxī AT wǎnqīegfrtūbiànxíngfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáihuànzhějiēshòujífēitìníhuòèluòtìnízhìliáodechéngběnxiàoyìfēnxī AT wǎnqīegfrtūbiànxíngfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáihuànzhějiēshòujífēitìníhuòèluòtìnízhìliáodechéngběnxiàoyìfēnxī |