Cargando…

既往吉非替尼治疗获益的晚期NSCLC患者再次使用EGFR-TKI的选择:原药还是换药?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who benefited from prior epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy, the choice of a second TKI therapy has gradually become a new strategy for the treatment. Some investigators reco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6000651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23866664
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2013.07.03
_version_ 1783331801170706432
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who benefited from prior epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy, the choice of a second TKI therapy has gradually become a new strategy for the treatment. Some investigators recommend that the second therapy should be continued with the original TKI; however, other investigators recommend the administration of another TKI. The aim of this study is to explore which choice is more reasonable. METHODS: In retrospect, patients with advanced NSCLC or with postoperative relapse of advanced NSCLC achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) in prior Gefitinib therapy, progression free survival (PFS) ≥3 months. They received repeated Gefitinib or Erlotinib at an interval of at least one month. The analysis was carried out with respect to efficacy and optimal population of the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were enrolled into the study, 30 in Gefitinib group and 31 in Erlotinib group. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. In the comparison between patients treated with Gefitinib and with Erlotinib, no statistical differences were seen for response rate (10% vs 22.6%, P=0.300, 6), disease control rate (60% vs 74.2%, P=0.237, 8), median PFS (3.0 vs 3.5 months, P=0.494, 5), or median OS (8.3 vs 8.5 months, P=0.140, 8). Multivariate analysis showed that in the initial dose of Gefitinib, PFS≥6 months (HR=0.317, 95%CI: 0.102-0.984, P=0.046, 9). With an interval ≥3 months (HR=0.224, 95%CI: 0.071-0.713, P=0.011, 3) between two doses of TKI, the risk of disease progression was reduced; but if with an interval ≥3 months (HR=0.262, 95%CI: 0.097-0.705, P=0.008, 0), the risk of death was reduced. CONCLUSION: Advanced NSCLC patients who benefited from prior Gefitinib therapy can benefit again either with the original drug Gefitinib or the alternative drug Erlotinib when a second TKI therapy is resumed. Such benefit is related to PFS of initial TKI therapy and time interval between two doses of TKI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6000651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher 中国肺癌杂志编辑部
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60006512018-07-06 既往吉非替尼治疗获益的晚期NSCLC患者再次使用EGFR-TKI的选择:原药还是换药? Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who benefited from prior epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy, the choice of a second TKI therapy has gradually become a new strategy for the treatment. Some investigators recommend that the second therapy should be continued with the original TKI; however, other investigators recommend the administration of another TKI. The aim of this study is to explore which choice is more reasonable. METHODS: In retrospect, patients with advanced NSCLC or with postoperative relapse of advanced NSCLC achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) in prior Gefitinib therapy, progression free survival (PFS) ≥3 months. They received repeated Gefitinib or Erlotinib at an interval of at least one month. The analysis was carried out with respect to efficacy and optimal population of the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were enrolled into the study, 30 in Gefitinib group and 31 in Erlotinib group. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. In the comparison between patients treated with Gefitinib and with Erlotinib, no statistical differences were seen for response rate (10% vs 22.6%, P=0.300, 6), disease control rate (60% vs 74.2%, P=0.237, 8), median PFS (3.0 vs 3.5 months, P=0.494, 5), or median OS (8.3 vs 8.5 months, P=0.140, 8). Multivariate analysis showed that in the initial dose of Gefitinib, PFS≥6 months (HR=0.317, 95%CI: 0.102-0.984, P=0.046, 9). With an interval ≥3 months (HR=0.224, 95%CI: 0.071-0.713, P=0.011, 3) between two doses of TKI, the risk of disease progression was reduced; but if with an interval ≥3 months (HR=0.262, 95%CI: 0.097-0.705, P=0.008, 0), the risk of death was reduced. CONCLUSION: Advanced NSCLC patients who benefited from prior Gefitinib therapy can benefit again either with the original drug Gefitinib or the alternative drug Erlotinib when a second TKI therapy is resumed. Such benefit is related to PFS of initial TKI therapy and time interval between two doses of TKI. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2013-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6000651/ /pubmed/23866664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2013.07.03 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle 临床研究
既往吉非替尼治疗获益的晚期NSCLC患者再次使用EGFR-TKI的选择:原药还是换药?
title 既往吉非替尼治疗获益的晚期NSCLC患者再次使用EGFR-TKI的选择:原药还是换药?
title_full 既往吉非替尼治疗获益的晚期NSCLC患者再次使用EGFR-TKI的选择:原药还是换药?
title_fullStr 既往吉非替尼治疗获益的晚期NSCLC患者再次使用EGFR-TKI的选择:原药还是换药?
title_full_unstemmed 既往吉非替尼治疗获益的晚期NSCLC患者再次使用EGFR-TKI的选择:原药还是换药?
title_short 既往吉非替尼治疗获益的晚期NSCLC患者再次使用EGFR-TKI的选择:原药还是换药?
title_sort 既往吉非替尼治疗获益的晚期nsclc患者再次使用egfr-tki的选择:原药还是换药?
topic 临床研究
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6000651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23866664
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2013.07.03
work_keys_str_mv AT jìwǎngjífēitìnízhìliáohuòyìdewǎnqīnsclchuànzhězàicìshǐyòngegfrtkidexuǎnzéyuányàoháishìhuànyào
AT jìwǎngjífēitìnízhìliáohuòyìdewǎnqīnsclchuànzhězàicìshǐyòngegfrtkidexuǎnzéyuányàoháishìhuànyào
AT jìwǎngjífēitìnízhìliáohuòyìdewǎnqīnsclchuànzhězàicìshǐyòngegfrtkidexuǎnzéyuányàoháishìhuànyào
AT jìwǎngjífēitìnízhìliáohuòyìdewǎnqīnsclchuànzhězàicìshǐyòngegfrtkidexuǎnzéyuányàoháishìhuànyào
AT jìwǎngjífēitìnízhìliáohuòyìdewǎnqīnsclchuànzhězàicìshǐyòngegfrtkidexuǎnzéyuányàoháishìhuànyào
AT jìwǎngjífēitìnízhìliáohuòyìdewǎnqīnsclchuànzhězàicìshǐyòngegfrtkidexuǎnzéyuányàoháishìhuànyào
AT jìwǎngjífēitìnízhìliáohuòyìdewǎnqīnsclchuànzhězàicìshǐyòngegfrtkidexuǎnzéyuányàoháishìhuànyào
AT jìwǎngjífēitìnízhìliáohuòyìdewǎnqīnsclchuànzhězàicìshǐyòngegfrtkidexuǎnzéyuányàoháishìhuànyào
AT jìwǎngjífēitìnízhìliáohuòyìdewǎnqīnsclchuànzhězàicìshǐyòngegfrtkidexuǎnzéyuányàoháishìhuànyào
AT jìwǎngjífēitìnízhìliáohuòyìdewǎnqīnsclchuànzhězàicìshǐyòngegfrtkidexuǎnzéyuányàoháishìhuànyào