Cargando…

Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) can provide the best evidence to inform decision-making, but their methodological and reporting quality varies. Tools exist to guide the critical appraisal of quality and risk of bias in SRs, but evaluations of their measure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Gates, Allison, Gates, Michelle, Duarte, Gonçalo, Cary, Maria, Becker, Monika, Prediger, Barbara, Vandermeer, Ben, Fernandes, Ricardo M., Pieper, Dawid, Hartling, Lisa
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2018
Materias:	Protocol
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6000957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29898777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0746-1

Ejemplares similares

Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
por: Dosenovic, Svjetlana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews
por: Swierz, Mateusz J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools
por: Pereira, Alexandre-Godinho, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2
por: Perry, R., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

An overview of systematic reviews of complementary and alternative therapies for fibromyalgia using both AMSTAR and ROBIS as quality assessment tools
por: Perry, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?
por: Wegewitz, Uta, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

How is AMSTAR applied by authors – a call for better reporting
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies?
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis Studies in Dance Therapy Using AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2
por: Kim, Hye-Ryeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
por: Pollock, Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews
por: Kang, Deying, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

User experience of applying AMSTAR 2 to appraise systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a commentary
por: De Santis, Karina Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement – a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools
por: Bühn, Stefanie, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
por: Shea, Beverley J., et al.
Publicado: (2007)

The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study
por: Matthias, Katja, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor
por: Faggion, Clovis Mariano
Publicado: (2015)

Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines
por: Kelly, Shannon E, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement
por: Burda, Brittany U., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Editorial Perspective: Time for Another Grading System—From PRISMA to AMSTAR 2
por: Chapman, Jens R.
Publicado: (2020)

Abstract: Assessing Quality in Systematic Reviews: Application of AMSTAR Criteria to Plastic Surgery Literature
por: Jenny, Hillary E., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR
por: Wu, Xinyu, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study
por: Lu, Cuncun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR
por: Yuan, Morgan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

157: ASSESSING THE METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSS) SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS BY AMSTAR CHECKLIST
por: Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluating Breast Reconstruction Reviews Using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
por: Yuan, Morgan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Commentary on: Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR
por: Gould, Daniel J
Publicado: (2021)

Adopting AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews: speed of the tool uptake and barriers for its adoption
por: Bojcic, Ruzica, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

AMSTAR 2 appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of heart failure from high-impact journals
por: Li, Lin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
por: Pollock, Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)
por: SEQUEIRA-BYRON, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Reporting and methodologic evaluation of meta-analyses published in the anesthesia literature according to AMSTAR and PRISMA checklists: a preliminary study
por: Oh, Jae Hoon, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Impact and Treatment of Sarcopenia in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy: A Multidisciplinary, AMSTAR-2 Compliant Review of Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses
por: Medici, Federica, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Critically Low Confidence in the Results Produced by Spine Surgery Systematic Reviews: An AMSTAR-2 Evaluation From 4 Spine Journals
por: Dettori, Joseph R., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of antidepressants effect on low back pain using updated AMSTAR
por: Panahi, Mohammad Hossein, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome using AMSTAR2
por: Guan, Xin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Different Approaches to Appraising Systematic Reviews of Digital Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion Using AMSTAR 2 Tool: Cross-Sectional Study
por: De Santis, Karina Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Alfred Watkis Roby Fletcher
Publicado: (1898)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ohhn383r321opc4h5hmpbfk9bv