Cargando…
Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial
BACKGROUND: The chronic and progressive nature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires self-administration of inhaled medication. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are increasingly being used for inhalation therapy in COPD. Important considerations when selecting DPIs include inhalation ef...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29898702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0662-0 |
_version_ | 1783331903243288576 |
---|---|
author | Altman, Pablo Wehbe, Luis Dederichs, Juergen Guerin, Tadhg Ament, Brian Moronta, Miguel Cardenas Pino, Andrea Valeria Goyal, Pankaj |
author_facet | Altman, Pablo Wehbe, Luis Dederichs, Juergen Guerin, Tadhg Ament, Brian Moronta, Miguel Cardenas Pino, Andrea Valeria Goyal, Pankaj |
author_sort | Altman, Pablo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The chronic and progressive nature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires self-administration of inhaled medication. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are increasingly being used for inhalation therapy in COPD. Important considerations when selecting DPIs include inhalation effort required and flow rates achieved by patients. Here, we present the comparison of the peak inspiratory flow rate (PIF) values achieved by COPD patients, with moderate to very severe airflow limitation, through the Breezhaler®, the Ellipta® and the HandiHaler® inhalers. The effects of disease severity, age and gender on PIF rate were also evaluated. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, multicenter, cross-over, Phase IV study recruited patients with moderate to very severe airflow limitation (Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease 2014 strategy), aged ≥40 years and having a smoking history of ≥10 pack years. No active drug or placebo was administered during the study. The inhalation profiles were recorded using inhalers fitted with a pressure tap and transducer at the wall of the mouthpiece. For each patient, the inhalation with the highest PIF value, out of three replicate inhalations per device, was selected for analysis. A paired t-test was performed to compare mean PIFs between each combination of devices. RESULTS: In total, 97 COPD patients were enrolled and completed the study. The highest mean PIF value (L/min ± SE) was observed with the Breezhaler® (108 ± 23), followed by the Ellipta® (78 ± 15) and the HandiHaler® (49 ± 9) inhalers and the lowest mean pressure drop values were recorded with the Breezhaler® inhaler, followed by the Ellipta® inhaler and the HandiHaler® inhaler, in the overall patient population. A similar trend was consistently observed in patients across all subgroups of COPD severity, within all age groups and for both genders. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COPD were able to inhale with the least inspiratory effort and generate the highest mean PIF value through the Breezhaler® inhaler when compared with the Ellipta® and the HandiHaler® inhalers. These results were similar irrespective of patients’ COPD severity, age or gender. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02596009 on 4 November 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12890-018-0662-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6001060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60010602018-06-26 Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial Altman, Pablo Wehbe, Luis Dederichs, Juergen Guerin, Tadhg Ament, Brian Moronta, Miguel Cardenas Pino, Andrea Valeria Goyal, Pankaj BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The chronic and progressive nature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires self-administration of inhaled medication. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are increasingly being used for inhalation therapy in COPD. Important considerations when selecting DPIs include inhalation effort required and flow rates achieved by patients. Here, we present the comparison of the peak inspiratory flow rate (PIF) values achieved by COPD patients, with moderate to very severe airflow limitation, through the Breezhaler®, the Ellipta® and the HandiHaler® inhalers. The effects of disease severity, age and gender on PIF rate were also evaluated. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, multicenter, cross-over, Phase IV study recruited patients with moderate to very severe airflow limitation (Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease 2014 strategy), aged ≥40 years and having a smoking history of ≥10 pack years. No active drug or placebo was administered during the study. The inhalation profiles were recorded using inhalers fitted with a pressure tap and transducer at the wall of the mouthpiece. For each patient, the inhalation with the highest PIF value, out of three replicate inhalations per device, was selected for analysis. A paired t-test was performed to compare mean PIFs between each combination of devices. RESULTS: In total, 97 COPD patients were enrolled and completed the study. The highest mean PIF value (L/min ± SE) was observed with the Breezhaler® (108 ± 23), followed by the Ellipta® (78 ± 15) and the HandiHaler® (49 ± 9) inhalers and the lowest mean pressure drop values were recorded with the Breezhaler® inhaler, followed by the Ellipta® inhaler and the HandiHaler® inhaler, in the overall patient population. A similar trend was consistently observed in patients across all subgroups of COPD severity, within all age groups and for both genders. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COPD were able to inhale with the least inspiratory effort and generate the highest mean PIF value through the Breezhaler® inhaler when compared with the Ellipta® and the HandiHaler® inhalers. These results were similar irrespective of patients’ COPD severity, age or gender. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02596009 on 4 November 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12890-018-0662-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6001060/ /pubmed/29898702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0662-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Altman, Pablo Wehbe, Luis Dederichs, Juergen Guerin, Tadhg Ament, Brian Moronta, Miguel Cardenas Pino, Andrea Valeria Goyal, Pankaj Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial |
title | Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial |
title_full | Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial |
title_short | Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial |
title_sort | comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the breezhaler®, ellipta® and handihaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe copd: a randomized cross-over trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29898702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0662-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT altmanpablo comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial AT wehbeluis comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial AT dederichsjuergen comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial AT guerintadhg comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial AT amentbrian comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial AT morontamiguelcardenas comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial AT pinoandreavaleria comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial AT goyalpankaj comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial |