Cargando…

‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists

BACKGROUND: Hymen reconstruction (HR) involves the restoration of the hymeneal membrane’s gross anatomical integrity. Among the medical profession, hymen reconstruction receives particular attention and its necessity is debated because the surgery is not medically indicated, and often reveals confli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leye, Els, Ogbe, Emilomo, Heyerick, Maaike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29898708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0587-z
_version_ 1783331921811472384
author Leye, Els
Ogbe, Emilomo
Heyerick, Maaike
author_facet Leye, Els
Ogbe, Emilomo
Heyerick, Maaike
author_sort Leye, Els
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hymen reconstruction (HR) involves the restoration of the hymeneal membrane’s gross anatomical integrity. Among the medical profession, hymen reconstruction receives particular attention and its necessity is debated because the surgery is not medically indicated, and often reveals conflicting social norms on virginity and marriageability between health professionals and their patients. The focus of this paper is not to address the many open questions that the ethics and politics around HR reveal, but rather aims at contributing to the much-needed empirical evidence. It presents findings of a study conducted in Belgium (Flanders region), among gynaecologists that aimed at assessing their knowledge, views, and experiences on hymen reconstruction. METHODS: A digital self-administered questionnaire-based survey was sent to Flemish gynaecologists and trainees in Flanders registered with the Flemish Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (VVOG). RESULTS: Hundred-and-nine questionnaires were completed. The majority of the respondents (73%) had requests to perform HR. Knowledge and technical skills about HR were considered to be sufficient (69%), even though HR does not seem to be integrated in medical curricula or post-graduate training. Most respondents (72%) would favour the publication of a guideline by their professional organisation. Few respondents discuss alternative options with the patient (19%) and half of the respondents reject to perform HR (49%). The majority of our respondents are against reimbursement of the surgery (70%). Not even half of our respondents believes that a patient is at risk of further violence (47%). 7% of the respondents mentioned complications, but the majority was able to perform a follow up consultation. CONCLUSIONS: The responses of this survey cannot be generalised to the entire population of gynaecologists in Flanders, but do provide insights in how gynaecologists confronted with HR are approaching such requests, and thus contributes to the empirical evidence. Our paper showed that many Flemish gynaecologist are likely to encounter requests for hymenoplasty, but that a majority would not perform the surgery. There seems to be a lack of guidance and debate in Flanders on the social and moral dimensions of HR, and a number of complexities were revealed when gynaecologists address HR that need further research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-018-0587-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6001123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60011232018-06-26 ‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists Leye, Els Ogbe, Emilomo Heyerick, Maaike BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Hymen reconstruction (HR) involves the restoration of the hymeneal membrane’s gross anatomical integrity. Among the medical profession, hymen reconstruction receives particular attention and its necessity is debated because the surgery is not medically indicated, and often reveals conflicting social norms on virginity and marriageability between health professionals and their patients. The focus of this paper is not to address the many open questions that the ethics and politics around HR reveal, but rather aims at contributing to the much-needed empirical evidence. It presents findings of a study conducted in Belgium (Flanders region), among gynaecologists that aimed at assessing their knowledge, views, and experiences on hymen reconstruction. METHODS: A digital self-administered questionnaire-based survey was sent to Flemish gynaecologists and trainees in Flanders registered with the Flemish Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (VVOG). RESULTS: Hundred-and-nine questionnaires were completed. The majority of the respondents (73%) had requests to perform HR. Knowledge and technical skills about HR were considered to be sufficient (69%), even though HR does not seem to be integrated in medical curricula or post-graduate training. Most respondents (72%) would favour the publication of a guideline by their professional organisation. Few respondents discuss alternative options with the patient (19%) and half of the respondents reject to perform HR (49%). The majority of our respondents are against reimbursement of the surgery (70%). Not even half of our respondents believes that a patient is at risk of further violence (47%). 7% of the respondents mentioned complications, but the majority was able to perform a follow up consultation. CONCLUSIONS: The responses of this survey cannot be generalised to the entire population of gynaecologists in Flanders, but do provide insights in how gynaecologists confronted with HR are approaching such requests, and thus contributes to the empirical evidence. Our paper showed that many Flemish gynaecologist are likely to encounter requests for hymenoplasty, but that a majority would not perform the surgery. There seems to be a lack of guidance and debate in Flanders on the social and moral dimensions of HR, and a number of complexities were revealed when gynaecologists address HR that need further research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-018-0587-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6001123/ /pubmed/29898708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0587-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leye, Els
Ogbe, Emilomo
Heyerick, Maaike
‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists
title ‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists
title_full ‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists
title_fullStr ‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists
title_full_unstemmed ‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists
title_short ‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists
title_sort ‘doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of flemish gynaecologists
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29898708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0587-z
work_keys_str_mv AT leyeels doinghymenreconstructionananalysisofperceptionsandexperiencesofflemishgynaecologists
AT ogbeemilomo doinghymenreconstructionananalysisofperceptionsandexperiencesofflemishgynaecologists
AT heyerickmaaike doinghymenreconstructionananalysisofperceptionsandexperiencesofflemishgynaecologists