Cargando…

Peripartum fetal distress in diabetic women: a retrospective case-cohort study

BACKGROUND: Major concerns of pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus are an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome. The objective of this study was to analyse the rate of fetal distress during labor in women with type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes compared to control women. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castelijn, B, Hollander, KWP, Hensbergen, JF, IJzerman, RG, Valkenburg-van den Berg, AW, Twisk, JWR, De Groot, CJM, Wouters, MGAJ
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29898693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1880-4
_version_ 1783331922777210880
author Castelijn, B
Hollander, KWP
Hensbergen, JF
IJzerman, RG
Valkenburg-van den Berg, AW
Twisk, JWR
De Groot, CJM
Wouters, MGAJ
author_facet Castelijn, B
Hollander, KWP
Hensbergen, JF
IJzerman, RG
Valkenburg-van den Berg, AW
Twisk, JWR
De Groot, CJM
Wouters, MGAJ
author_sort Castelijn, B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Major concerns of pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus are an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome. The objective of this study was to analyse the rate of fetal distress during labor in women with type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes compared to control women. METHODS: A retrospective case-cohort study was conducted at the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; a tertiary care hospital. 117 women with type 1 diabetes, 59 women with type 2 diabetes, 303 women with gestational diabetes and 15,260 control women were included, who delivered between March 2004 and February 2014. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to compare maternal and pregnancy characteristics. Risk of fetal distress and perinatal asphyxia was assessed by multiple regression analyses, adjusted for confounding factors as age, smoking, parity, previous cesarean section, hypertensive disorder, pre-eclampsia, prematurity, induction of labor and macrosomia. Main outcome measure was fetal distress, defined either as clinical indication for instrumental or cesarean delivery; or low umbilical artery pH (UA pH), or admission to neonatal unit (NU). RESULTS: The indication for instrumental or cesarean delivery in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus was more frequently based on fetal distress as compared to controls (adjusted OR 2.76 CI 1.74–4.40 and adjusted OR 2.31 CI 1.19–4.51, respectively). In comparison with the control group, infants of women with type 1 diabetes had an increased risk of UA pH < 7.20 (adjusted OR 1.88 CI 1.23–2.87) or UA pH < 7.10 (adjusted OR 3.35 CI 1.79–6.27). Also, infants of women with type 1 diabetes were at increased risk for admission to NU as compared to infants of control women (OR 8.07 CI 4.75–13.70). CONCLUSIONS: Women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of fetal distress during labor as compared to controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6001127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60011272018-06-26 Peripartum fetal distress in diabetic women: a retrospective case-cohort study Castelijn, B Hollander, KWP Hensbergen, JF IJzerman, RG Valkenburg-van den Berg, AW Twisk, JWR De Groot, CJM Wouters, MGAJ BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Major concerns of pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus are an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome. The objective of this study was to analyse the rate of fetal distress during labor in women with type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes compared to control women. METHODS: A retrospective case-cohort study was conducted at the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; a tertiary care hospital. 117 women with type 1 diabetes, 59 women with type 2 diabetes, 303 women with gestational diabetes and 15,260 control women were included, who delivered between March 2004 and February 2014. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to compare maternal and pregnancy characteristics. Risk of fetal distress and perinatal asphyxia was assessed by multiple regression analyses, adjusted for confounding factors as age, smoking, parity, previous cesarean section, hypertensive disorder, pre-eclampsia, prematurity, induction of labor and macrosomia. Main outcome measure was fetal distress, defined either as clinical indication for instrumental or cesarean delivery; or low umbilical artery pH (UA pH), or admission to neonatal unit (NU). RESULTS: The indication for instrumental or cesarean delivery in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus was more frequently based on fetal distress as compared to controls (adjusted OR 2.76 CI 1.74–4.40 and adjusted OR 2.31 CI 1.19–4.51, respectively). In comparison with the control group, infants of women with type 1 diabetes had an increased risk of UA pH < 7.20 (adjusted OR 1.88 CI 1.23–2.87) or UA pH < 7.10 (adjusted OR 3.35 CI 1.79–6.27). Also, infants of women with type 1 diabetes were at increased risk for admission to NU as compared to infants of control women (OR 8.07 CI 4.75–13.70). CONCLUSIONS: Women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of fetal distress during labor as compared to controls. BioMed Central 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6001127/ /pubmed/29898693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1880-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Castelijn, B
Hollander, KWP
Hensbergen, JF
IJzerman, RG
Valkenburg-van den Berg, AW
Twisk, JWR
De Groot, CJM
Wouters, MGAJ
Peripartum fetal distress in diabetic women: a retrospective case-cohort study
title Peripartum fetal distress in diabetic women: a retrospective case-cohort study
title_full Peripartum fetal distress in diabetic women: a retrospective case-cohort study
title_fullStr Peripartum fetal distress in diabetic women: a retrospective case-cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Peripartum fetal distress in diabetic women: a retrospective case-cohort study
title_short Peripartum fetal distress in diabetic women: a retrospective case-cohort study
title_sort peripartum fetal distress in diabetic women: a retrospective case-cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29898693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1880-4
work_keys_str_mv AT castelijnb peripartumfetaldistressindiabeticwomenaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT hollanderkwp peripartumfetaldistressindiabeticwomenaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT hensbergenjf peripartumfetaldistressindiabeticwomenaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT ijzermanrg peripartumfetaldistressindiabeticwomenaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT valkenburgvandenbergaw peripartumfetaldistressindiabeticwomenaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT twiskjwr peripartumfetaldistressindiabeticwomenaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT degrootcjm peripartumfetaldistressindiabeticwomenaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT woutersmgaj peripartumfetaldistressindiabeticwomenaretrospectivecasecohortstudy