Cargando…

Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is associated with the development of adverse pulmonary and non-pulmonary outcomes in very premature infants. Various modes of non-invasive respiratory support are increasingly being used to decrease the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Xing-Wang, Shi, Yuan, Shi, Li-Ping, Liu, Ling, Xue, Jiang, Ramanathan, Rangasamy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29898763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2673-9
_version_ 1783331924941471744
author Zhu, Xing-Wang
Shi, Yuan
Shi, Li-Ping
Liu, Ling
Xue, Jiang
Ramanathan, Rangasamy
author_facet Zhu, Xing-Wang
Shi, Yuan
Shi, Li-Ping
Liu, Ling
Xue, Jiang
Ramanathan, Rangasamy
author_sort Zhu, Xing-Wang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is associated with the development of adverse pulmonary and non-pulmonary outcomes in very premature infants. Various modes of non-invasive respiratory support are increasingly being used to decrease the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The aim of this trial is to compare the effect of non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) as a primary non-invasive ventilation support mode. METHODS/DESIGN: In this multi-center randomized controlled trial, 300 preterm infants born at a gestational age of 26(6/7) to 33(6/7) weeks with a diagnosis of RDS will be randomized to NHFOV or NCPAP as a primary mode of non-invasive respiratory support. The study will be conducted in 18 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in China. The primary outcome is the need for IMV during the first 7 days after enrollment in preterm infants randomized to the two groups. The prespecified secondary outcomes include days of hospitalization, days on non-invasive respiratory support, days on IMV, days on supplemental oxygen, mortality, need for a surfactant, severe retinopathy of prematurity requiring laser treatment or surgery, patent ductus arteriosus needing ligation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, abdominal distention, air leak syndromes, intraventricular hemorrhage (≥ grade 3), spontaneous intestinal perforation, necrotizing enterocolitis (≥II stage), and nasal trauma. Other secondary outcomes include Bayley Scales of Infant Development at 18–24 months of corrected age. DISCUSSION: In recent decades, several observational studies have compared the effects of NHFOV and NCPAP in neonates as a rescue mode or during weaning from IMV. To our knowledge, this will be the first multi-center prospective, randomized controlled trial to evaluate NHFOV as a primary mode in preterm infants with RDS in China or any other part of the world. Our trial may help to establish guidelines for NHFOV in preterm infants with RDS to minimize the need for IMV, and to decrease the significant pulmonary and non-pulmonary morbidities associated with IMV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03099694. Registered on 4 April 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2673-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6001134
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60011342018-06-26 Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial Zhu, Xing-Wang Shi, Yuan Shi, Li-Ping Liu, Ling Xue, Jiang Ramanathan, Rangasamy Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is associated with the development of adverse pulmonary and non-pulmonary outcomes in very premature infants. Various modes of non-invasive respiratory support are increasingly being used to decrease the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The aim of this trial is to compare the effect of non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) as a primary non-invasive ventilation support mode. METHODS/DESIGN: In this multi-center randomized controlled trial, 300 preterm infants born at a gestational age of 26(6/7) to 33(6/7) weeks with a diagnosis of RDS will be randomized to NHFOV or NCPAP as a primary mode of non-invasive respiratory support. The study will be conducted in 18 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in China. The primary outcome is the need for IMV during the first 7 days after enrollment in preterm infants randomized to the two groups. The prespecified secondary outcomes include days of hospitalization, days on non-invasive respiratory support, days on IMV, days on supplemental oxygen, mortality, need for a surfactant, severe retinopathy of prematurity requiring laser treatment or surgery, patent ductus arteriosus needing ligation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, abdominal distention, air leak syndromes, intraventricular hemorrhage (≥ grade 3), spontaneous intestinal perforation, necrotizing enterocolitis (≥II stage), and nasal trauma. Other secondary outcomes include Bayley Scales of Infant Development at 18–24 months of corrected age. DISCUSSION: In recent decades, several observational studies have compared the effects of NHFOV and NCPAP in neonates as a rescue mode or during weaning from IMV. To our knowledge, this will be the first multi-center prospective, randomized controlled trial to evaluate NHFOV as a primary mode in preterm infants with RDS in China or any other part of the world. Our trial may help to establish guidelines for NHFOV in preterm infants with RDS to minimize the need for IMV, and to decrease the significant pulmonary and non-pulmonary morbidities associated with IMV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03099694. Registered on 4 April 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2673-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6001134/ /pubmed/29898763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2673-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Zhu, Xing-Wang
Shi, Yuan
Shi, Li-Ping
Liu, Ling
Xue, Jiang
Ramanathan, Rangasamy
Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial
title Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29898763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2673-9
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuxingwang noninvasivehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationversusnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureinpreterminfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndromestudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shiyuan noninvasivehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationversusnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureinpreterminfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndromestudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shiliping noninvasivehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationversusnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureinpreterminfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndromestudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liuling noninvasivehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationversusnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureinpreterminfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndromestudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xuejiang noninvasivehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationversusnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureinpreterminfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndromestudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ramanathanrangasamy noninvasivehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationversusnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureinpreterminfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndromestudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT noninvasivehighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationversusnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureinpreterminfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndromestudyprotocolforamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial