Cargando…

Feasibility of conducting a web-based survey of patient-reported outcomes and rehabilitation progress

BACKGROUND: Web-based surveys provide an efficient means to track clinical outcomes over time without the use of clinician time for additional paperwork. Our purpose was to determine the feasibility of utilizing web-based surveys to capture rehabilitation compliance and clinical outcomes among posto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howard, Jennifer S, Toonstra, Jenny L, Meade, Amanda R, Whale Conley, Caitlin E, Mattacola, Carl G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207616644844
_version_ 1783331938869706752
author Howard, Jennifer S
Toonstra, Jenny L
Meade, Amanda R
Whale Conley, Caitlin E
Mattacola, Carl G
author_facet Howard, Jennifer S
Toonstra, Jenny L
Meade, Amanda R
Whale Conley, Caitlin E
Mattacola, Carl G
author_sort Howard, Jennifer S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Web-based surveys provide an efficient means to track clinical outcomes over time without the use of clinician time for additional paperwork. Our purpose was to determine the feasibility of utilizing web-based surveys to capture rehabilitation compliance and clinical outcomes among postoperative orthopedic patients. The study hypotheses were that (a) recruitment rate would be high (>90%), (b) patients receiving surveys every two weeks would demonstrate higher response rates than patients that receive surveys every four weeks, and (c) response rates would decrease over time. METHODS: The study deaign involved a longitudinal cohort. Surgical knee patients were recruited for study participation during their first post-operative visit (n = 59, 34.9 ± 12.0 years of age). Patients with Internet access, an available email address and willingness to participate were counter-balanced into groups to receive surveys either every two or four weeks for 24 weeks post-surgery. The surveys included questions related to rehabilitation and questions from standard patient-reported outcome measures. Outcome measures included recruitment rate (participants consented/patients approached), eligibility (participants with email/participants consented), willingness (willing participants/participants eligible), and response rate (percentage of surveys completed by willing participants). RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were approached regarding participation. Recruitment rate was 98% (n = 58). Eligibility was 95% (n = 55), and willingness was 91% (n = 50). The average response rate was 42% across both groups. There was no difference in the median response rates between the two-week (50%, range 0–100%) and four-week groups (33%, range 0–100%; p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients report being willing and able to participate in a web-based survey, response rates failed to exceed 50% in both the two-week and four-week groups. Furthermore, response rates began to decrease after the first three months postoperatively. Therefore, supplementary data collection procedures may be necessary to meet established research quality standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6001185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60011852018-06-25 Feasibility of conducting a web-based survey of patient-reported outcomes and rehabilitation progress Howard, Jennifer S Toonstra, Jenny L Meade, Amanda R Whale Conley, Caitlin E Mattacola, Carl G Digit Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Web-based surveys provide an efficient means to track clinical outcomes over time without the use of clinician time for additional paperwork. Our purpose was to determine the feasibility of utilizing web-based surveys to capture rehabilitation compliance and clinical outcomes among postoperative orthopedic patients. The study hypotheses were that (a) recruitment rate would be high (>90%), (b) patients receiving surveys every two weeks would demonstrate higher response rates than patients that receive surveys every four weeks, and (c) response rates would decrease over time. METHODS: The study deaign involved a longitudinal cohort. Surgical knee patients were recruited for study participation during their first post-operative visit (n = 59, 34.9 ± 12.0 years of age). Patients with Internet access, an available email address and willingness to participate were counter-balanced into groups to receive surveys either every two or four weeks for 24 weeks post-surgery. The surveys included questions related to rehabilitation and questions from standard patient-reported outcome measures. Outcome measures included recruitment rate (participants consented/patients approached), eligibility (participants with email/participants consented), willingness (willing participants/participants eligible), and response rate (percentage of surveys completed by willing participants). RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were approached regarding participation. Recruitment rate was 98% (n = 58). Eligibility was 95% (n = 55), and willingness was 91% (n = 50). The average response rate was 42% across both groups. There was no difference in the median response rates between the two-week (50%, range 0–100%) and four-week groups (33%, range 0–100%; p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients report being willing and able to participate in a web-based survey, response rates failed to exceed 50% in both the two-week and four-week groups. Furthermore, response rates began to decrease after the first three months postoperatively. Therefore, supplementary data collection procedures may be necessary to meet established research quality standards. SAGE Publications 2016-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6001185/ /pubmed/29942553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207616644844 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Howard, Jennifer S
Toonstra, Jenny L
Meade, Amanda R
Whale Conley, Caitlin E
Mattacola, Carl G
Feasibility of conducting a web-based survey of patient-reported outcomes and rehabilitation progress
title Feasibility of conducting a web-based survey of patient-reported outcomes and rehabilitation progress
title_full Feasibility of conducting a web-based survey of patient-reported outcomes and rehabilitation progress
title_fullStr Feasibility of conducting a web-based survey of patient-reported outcomes and rehabilitation progress
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of conducting a web-based survey of patient-reported outcomes and rehabilitation progress
title_short Feasibility of conducting a web-based survey of patient-reported outcomes and rehabilitation progress
title_sort feasibility of conducting a web-based survey of patient-reported outcomes and rehabilitation progress
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207616644844
work_keys_str_mv AT howardjennifers feasibilityofconductingawebbasedsurveyofpatientreportedoutcomesandrehabilitationprogress
AT toonstrajennyl feasibilityofconductingawebbasedsurveyofpatientreportedoutcomesandrehabilitationprogress
AT meadeamandar feasibilityofconductingawebbasedsurveyofpatientreportedoutcomesandrehabilitationprogress
AT whaleconleycaitline feasibilityofconductingawebbasedsurveyofpatientreportedoutcomesandrehabilitationprogress
AT mattacolacarlg feasibilityofconductingawebbasedsurveyofpatientreportedoutcomesandrehabilitationprogress