Cargando…

Exploring the ambivalent evidence base of mobile health (mHealth): A systematic literature review on the use of mobile phones for the improvement of community health in Africa

BACKGROUND: Africa is labelled the world's fastest-growing ‘mobile region’. Considering such growth and the fragility of the continent's healthcare, mHealth has flourished. This review explores mHealth for community health in Africa in order to assess its still ambivalent evidence base. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krah, Eva FM, de Kruijf, Johannes G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207616679264
_version_ 1783331943295746048
author Krah, Eva FM
de Kruijf, Johannes G
author_facet Krah, Eva FM
de Kruijf, Johannes G
author_sort Krah, Eva FM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Africa is labelled the world's fastest-growing ‘mobile region’. Considering such growth and the fragility of the continent's healthcare, mHealth has flourished. This review explores mHealth for community health in Africa in order to assess its still ambivalent evidence base. METHODS: Using PubMed, Web of Science, OvidSP and Google Scholar, a systematic review was conducted of one decade (2005–2015) of peer-reviewed literature on mHealth in Africa. Data analysis focused on qualifications of success and failure. Impact evaluations of project assessments (n = 65) were complemented with general analyses/overviews of mHealth's effectiveness (n = 35). RESULTS: Review of these texts reveals ambivalence in the appraisal of mHealth; essentially, the critical stance in general analyses/overviews is absent from project assessments. Especially weak evidence concerning sustainability and scalability is stressed in overviews. Project assessments are more optimistic. Their analysis suggests a causal connection between simplicity and success. Effective interventions are thus characterized by straightforward design and modest objectives. Greatest impediments of impact are general technology-related issues and intervention inappropriateness due to insufficient understanding of beneficiaries and specific context of use (circumstantial complications). CONCLUSION: Distinguishing between these two categories of complications helps to break the deadlock that marks the mHealth debate and add nuance to claims that mHealth's evidence base is weak. Constructive realism – rather than unfounded optimism or pessimism without nuance – should guide the design of interventions. Besides anticipative of technology-related complications, such realism must lead to either basic interventions or to smart mHealth shaped by deep understanding of the context of implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6001200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60012002018-06-25 Exploring the ambivalent evidence base of mobile health (mHealth): A systematic literature review on the use of mobile phones for the improvement of community health in Africa Krah, Eva FM de Kruijf, Johannes G Digit Health Review Article BACKGROUND: Africa is labelled the world's fastest-growing ‘mobile region’. Considering such growth and the fragility of the continent's healthcare, mHealth has flourished. This review explores mHealth for community health in Africa in order to assess its still ambivalent evidence base. METHODS: Using PubMed, Web of Science, OvidSP and Google Scholar, a systematic review was conducted of one decade (2005–2015) of peer-reviewed literature on mHealth in Africa. Data analysis focused on qualifications of success and failure. Impact evaluations of project assessments (n = 65) were complemented with general analyses/overviews of mHealth's effectiveness (n = 35). RESULTS: Review of these texts reveals ambivalence in the appraisal of mHealth; essentially, the critical stance in general analyses/overviews is absent from project assessments. Especially weak evidence concerning sustainability and scalability is stressed in overviews. Project assessments are more optimistic. Their analysis suggests a causal connection between simplicity and success. Effective interventions are thus characterized by straightforward design and modest objectives. Greatest impediments of impact are general technology-related issues and intervention inappropriateness due to insufficient understanding of beneficiaries and specific context of use (circumstantial complications). CONCLUSION: Distinguishing between these two categories of complications helps to break the deadlock that marks the mHealth debate and add nuance to claims that mHealth's evidence base is weak. Constructive realism – rather than unfounded optimism or pessimism without nuance – should guide the design of interventions. Besides anticipative of technology-related complications, such realism must lead to either basic interventions or to smart mHealth shaped by deep understanding of the context of implementation. SAGE Publications 2016-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6001200/ /pubmed/29942576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207616679264 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Article
Krah, Eva FM
de Kruijf, Johannes G
Exploring the ambivalent evidence base of mobile health (mHealth): A systematic literature review on the use of mobile phones for the improvement of community health in Africa
title Exploring the ambivalent evidence base of mobile health (mHealth): A systematic literature review on the use of mobile phones for the improvement of community health in Africa
title_full Exploring the ambivalent evidence base of mobile health (mHealth): A systematic literature review on the use of mobile phones for the improvement of community health in Africa
title_fullStr Exploring the ambivalent evidence base of mobile health (mHealth): A systematic literature review on the use of mobile phones for the improvement of community health in Africa
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the ambivalent evidence base of mobile health (mHealth): A systematic literature review on the use of mobile phones for the improvement of community health in Africa
title_short Exploring the ambivalent evidence base of mobile health (mHealth): A systematic literature review on the use of mobile phones for the improvement of community health in Africa
title_sort exploring the ambivalent evidence base of mobile health (mhealth): a systematic literature review on the use of mobile phones for the improvement of community health in africa
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207616679264
work_keys_str_mv AT krahevafm exploringtheambivalentevidencebaseofmobilehealthmhealthasystematicliteraturereviewontheuseofmobilephonesfortheimprovementofcommunityhealthinafrica
AT dekruijfjohannesg exploringtheambivalentevidencebaseofmobilehealthmhealthasystematicliteraturereviewontheuseofmobilephonesfortheimprovementofcommunityhealthinafrica