Cargando…

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a fully self-guided internet-based intervention for sub-clinical social anxiety symptoms: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial

DESIGN AND OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the protocol for a large-scale pragmatic, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the self-directed E-Couch social anxiety module versus a waiting list control condition, for reducing su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Powell, John, Atherton, Helen, Williams, Veronika, Martin, Angela, Bennett, Kylie, Bennett, Anthony, Mollison, Jill, Yu, Ly-Mee, Yang, Yaling, Locock, Louise, Davoudianfar, Mina, Griffiths, Kathleen M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207617702272
_version_ 1783331945263923200
author Powell, John
Atherton, Helen
Williams, Veronika
Martin, Angela
Bennett, Kylie
Bennett, Anthony
Mollison, Jill
Yu, Ly-Mee
Yang, Yaling
Locock, Louise
Davoudianfar, Mina
Griffiths, Kathleen M
author_facet Powell, John
Atherton, Helen
Williams, Veronika
Martin, Angela
Bennett, Kylie
Bennett, Anthony
Mollison, Jill
Yu, Ly-Mee
Yang, Yaling
Locock, Louise
Davoudianfar, Mina
Griffiths, Kathleen M
author_sort Powell, John
collection PubMed
description DESIGN AND OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the protocol for a large-scale pragmatic, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the self-directed E-Couch social anxiety module versus a waiting list control condition, for reducing sub-clinical social anxiety symptoms in the general population. STUDY POPULATION: Community-based adults (aged 18+) with social anxiety symptoms that do not meet the criteria for social anxiety disorder recruited via a direct-to-consumer advertisement on national websites. INTERVENTION AND CONTROL: Intervention is the self-guided E-Couch social anxiety module. Control group participants are placed on a waiting list to receive the intervention at the end of the trial. Both groups receive email and text message reminders. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome will be change in self-reported social anxiety score using the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). Secondary outcomes will be the changes in the following self-report measures: Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (BFNE-S); depression (CES-D); mental wellbeing (SWEMWEBS); health status (SF36); use of health services; safety events; and adherence, retention, and attrition rates. All measures will be administered at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months. ANALYSIS: A mixed effects model will be used to analyse the effect of the intervention on the primary and secondary outcomes (intention to treat analysis). Secondary analyses will explore moderators and mediators of effect. A prospective economic evaluation, conducted from a NHS and social care perspective, will provide estimates of cost utility and cost-effectiveness. An interview study will be conducted with 20 participants to explore issues including acceptability, adherence, retention and attrition. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02451878 and ISRCTN15819951
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6001207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60012072018-06-25 Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a fully self-guided internet-based intervention for sub-clinical social anxiety symptoms: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial Powell, John Atherton, Helen Williams, Veronika Martin, Angela Bennett, Kylie Bennett, Anthony Mollison, Jill Yu, Ly-Mee Yang, Yaling Locock, Louise Davoudianfar, Mina Griffiths, Kathleen M Digit Health Research Protocol DESIGN AND OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the protocol for a large-scale pragmatic, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the self-directed E-Couch social anxiety module versus a waiting list control condition, for reducing sub-clinical social anxiety symptoms in the general population. STUDY POPULATION: Community-based adults (aged 18+) with social anxiety symptoms that do not meet the criteria for social anxiety disorder recruited via a direct-to-consumer advertisement on national websites. INTERVENTION AND CONTROL: Intervention is the self-guided E-Couch social anxiety module. Control group participants are placed on a waiting list to receive the intervention at the end of the trial. Both groups receive email and text message reminders. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome will be change in self-reported social anxiety score using the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). Secondary outcomes will be the changes in the following self-report measures: Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (BFNE-S); depression (CES-D); mental wellbeing (SWEMWEBS); health status (SF36); use of health services; safety events; and adherence, retention, and attrition rates. All measures will be administered at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months. ANALYSIS: A mixed effects model will be used to analyse the effect of the intervention on the primary and secondary outcomes (intention to treat analysis). Secondary analyses will explore moderators and mediators of effect. A prospective economic evaluation, conducted from a NHS and social care perspective, will provide estimates of cost utility and cost-effectiveness. An interview study will be conducted with 20 participants to explore issues including acceptability, adherence, retention and attrition. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02451878 and ISRCTN15819951 SAGE Publications 2017-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6001207/ /pubmed/29942591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207617702272 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Protocol
Powell, John
Atherton, Helen
Williams, Veronika
Martin, Angela
Bennett, Kylie
Bennett, Anthony
Mollison, Jill
Yu, Ly-Mee
Yang, Yaling
Locock, Louise
Davoudianfar, Mina
Griffiths, Kathleen M
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a fully self-guided internet-based intervention for sub-clinical social anxiety symptoms: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a fully self-guided internet-based intervention for sub-clinical social anxiety symptoms: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a fully self-guided internet-based intervention for sub-clinical social anxiety symptoms: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a fully self-guided internet-based intervention for sub-clinical social anxiety symptoms: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a fully self-guided internet-based intervention for sub-clinical social anxiety symptoms: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a fully self-guided internet-based intervention for sub-clinical social anxiety symptoms: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a fully self-guided internet-based intervention for sub-clinical social anxiety symptoms: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207617702272
work_keys_str_mv AT powelljohn effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofafullyselfguidedinternetbasedinterventionforsubclinicalsocialanxietysymptomsprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT athertonhelen effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofafullyselfguidedinternetbasedinterventionforsubclinicalsocialanxietysymptomsprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT williamsveronika effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofafullyselfguidedinternetbasedinterventionforsubclinicalsocialanxietysymptomsprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT martinangela effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofafullyselfguidedinternetbasedinterventionforsubclinicalsocialanxietysymptomsprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bennettkylie effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofafullyselfguidedinternetbasedinterventionforsubclinicalsocialanxietysymptomsprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bennettanthony effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofafullyselfguidedinternetbasedinterventionforsubclinicalsocialanxietysymptomsprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mollisonjill effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofafullyselfguidedinternetbasedinterventionforsubclinicalsocialanxietysymptomsprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yulymee effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofafullyselfguidedinternetbasedinterventionforsubclinicalsocialanxietysymptomsprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yangyaling effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofafullyselfguidedinternetbasedinterventionforsubclinicalsocialanxietysymptomsprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lococklouise effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofafullyselfguidedinternetbasedinterventionforsubclinicalsocialanxietysymptomsprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT davoudianfarmina effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofafullyselfguidedinternetbasedinterventionforsubclinicalsocialanxietysymptomsprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT griffithskathleenm effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofafullyselfguidedinternetbasedinterventionforsubclinicalsocialanxietysymptomsprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial