Cargando…

Power Difference and Risk Perception: Mapping Vulnerability within the Decision Process of Pregnant Women towards Clinical Trial Participation in an Urban Middle‐Income Setting

To address the burden of maternal morbidity and mortality in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), research with pregnant women in these settings is increasingly common. Pregnant women in LMIC‐context may experience vulnerability related to giving consent to participate in a clinical trial. To r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Den hollander, Geerte C., Browne, Joyce l., Arhinful, Daniel, van der Graaf, Rieke, Klipstein‐Grobusch, Kerstin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27761986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12132
_version_ 1783332002436481024
author Den hollander, Geerte C.
Browne, Joyce l.
Arhinful, Daniel
van der Graaf, Rieke
Klipstein‐Grobusch, Kerstin
author_facet Den hollander, Geerte C.
Browne, Joyce l.
Arhinful, Daniel
van der Graaf, Rieke
Klipstein‐Grobusch, Kerstin
author_sort Den hollander, Geerte C.
collection PubMed
description To address the burden of maternal morbidity and mortality in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), research with pregnant women in these settings is increasingly common. Pregnant women in LMIC‐context may experience vulnerability related to giving consent to participate in a clinical trial. To recognize possible layers of vulnerability this study aims to identify factors that influence the decision process towards clinical trial participation of pregnant women in an urban middle‐income setting. This qualitative research used participant observation, in‐depth interviews, and focus group discussion with medical staff and pregnant women eligible for trial participation, at a regional hospital in Accra, Ghana. Besides lack of familiarity with modern scientific concepts, specific factors influencing the decision‐making process were identified. These include a wide power difference between health provider and patient, and a different perception of risk through externalization of responsibility of risk management within a religious context as well as a context shaped by authority. Also, therapeutic misconception was observed. The combination of these factors ensued women to rely on the opinion of the medical professional, rather than being guided by their own motivation to participation. Although being a (pregnant) woman per se should not render the label of being vulnerable, this study shows there are factors that influence the decision process of pregnant woman towards trial participation in a LMIC context that can result in vulnerability. The identification of context‐specific factors that can create vulnerability facilitates adaptation of the design and conduct of research in a culturally competent manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6001438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60014382018-06-21 Power Difference and Risk Perception: Mapping Vulnerability within the Decision Process of Pregnant Women towards Clinical Trial Participation in an Urban Middle‐Income Setting Den hollander, Geerte C. Browne, Joyce l. Arhinful, Daniel van der Graaf, Rieke Klipstein‐Grobusch, Kerstin Dev World Bioeth Articles To address the burden of maternal morbidity and mortality in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), research with pregnant women in these settings is increasingly common. Pregnant women in LMIC‐context may experience vulnerability related to giving consent to participate in a clinical trial. To recognize possible layers of vulnerability this study aims to identify factors that influence the decision process towards clinical trial participation of pregnant women in an urban middle‐income setting. This qualitative research used participant observation, in‐depth interviews, and focus group discussion with medical staff and pregnant women eligible for trial participation, at a regional hospital in Accra, Ghana. Besides lack of familiarity with modern scientific concepts, specific factors influencing the decision‐making process were identified. These include a wide power difference between health provider and patient, and a different perception of risk through externalization of responsibility of risk management within a religious context as well as a context shaped by authority. Also, therapeutic misconception was observed. The combination of these factors ensued women to rely on the opinion of the medical professional, rather than being guided by their own motivation to participation. Although being a (pregnant) woman per se should not render the label of being vulnerable, this study shows there are factors that influence the decision process of pregnant woman towards trial participation in a LMIC context that can result in vulnerability. The identification of context‐specific factors that can create vulnerability facilitates adaptation of the design and conduct of research in a culturally competent manner. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-20 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6001438/ /pubmed/27761986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12132 Text en © 2016 The Authors Developing World Bioethics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Den hollander, Geerte C.
Browne, Joyce l.
Arhinful, Daniel
van der Graaf, Rieke
Klipstein‐Grobusch, Kerstin
Power Difference and Risk Perception: Mapping Vulnerability within the Decision Process of Pregnant Women towards Clinical Trial Participation in an Urban Middle‐Income Setting
title Power Difference and Risk Perception: Mapping Vulnerability within the Decision Process of Pregnant Women towards Clinical Trial Participation in an Urban Middle‐Income Setting
title_full Power Difference and Risk Perception: Mapping Vulnerability within the Decision Process of Pregnant Women towards Clinical Trial Participation in an Urban Middle‐Income Setting
title_fullStr Power Difference and Risk Perception: Mapping Vulnerability within the Decision Process of Pregnant Women towards Clinical Trial Participation in an Urban Middle‐Income Setting
title_full_unstemmed Power Difference and Risk Perception: Mapping Vulnerability within the Decision Process of Pregnant Women towards Clinical Trial Participation in an Urban Middle‐Income Setting
title_short Power Difference and Risk Perception: Mapping Vulnerability within the Decision Process of Pregnant Women towards Clinical Trial Participation in an Urban Middle‐Income Setting
title_sort power difference and risk perception: mapping vulnerability within the decision process of pregnant women towards clinical trial participation in an urban middle‐income setting
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27761986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12132
work_keys_str_mv AT denhollandergeertec powerdifferenceandriskperceptionmappingvulnerabilitywithinthedecisionprocessofpregnantwomentowardsclinicaltrialparticipationinanurbanmiddleincomesetting
AT brownejoycel powerdifferenceandriskperceptionmappingvulnerabilitywithinthedecisionprocessofpregnantwomentowardsclinicaltrialparticipationinanurbanmiddleincomesetting
AT arhinfuldaniel powerdifferenceandriskperceptionmappingvulnerabilitywithinthedecisionprocessofpregnantwomentowardsclinicaltrialparticipationinanurbanmiddleincomesetting
AT vandergraafrieke powerdifferenceandriskperceptionmappingvulnerabilitywithinthedecisionprocessofpregnantwomentowardsclinicaltrialparticipationinanurbanmiddleincomesetting
AT klipsteingrobuschkerstin powerdifferenceandriskperceptionmappingvulnerabilitywithinthedecisionprocessofpregnantwomentowardsclinicaltrialparticipationinanurbanmiddleincomesetting