Cargando…

Investigating capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry for the analysis of common post‐translational modifications

Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry is a very efficient analytical method for the analysis of post‐translational modifications because of its high separation efficiency and high detection sensitivity. Here we applied CE‐MS using three differently coated separation capillaries for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faserl, Klaus, Sarg, Bettina, Gruber, Peter, Lindner, Herbert H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29389038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.201700437
_version_ 1783332034617278464
author Faserl, Klaus
Sarg, Bettina
Gruber, Peter
Lindner, Herbert H.
author_facet Faserl, Klaus
Sarg, Bettina
Gruber, Peter
Lindner, Herbert H.
author_sort Faserl, Klaus
collection PubMed
description Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry is a very efficient analytical method for the analysis of post‐translational modifications because of its high separation efficiency and high detection sensitivity. Here we applied CE‐MS using three differently coated separation capillaries for in‐depth analysis of a set of 70 synthetic post‐translationally modified peptides (including phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, and nitration). We evaluated the results in terms of peptide detection and separation characteristics and found that the use of a neutrally coated capillary resulted in highest overall signal intensity of singly modified peptides. In contrast, the use of a bare‐fused silica capillary was superior in the identification of multi‐phosphorylated peptides (12 out of 15 were identified). Fast separations of approximately 12 min could be achieved using a positively coated capillary, however, at the cost of separation efficiency. A comparison to nanoLC‐MS revealed that multi‐phosphorylated peptides interact with the RP material very poorly so that these peptides were either washed out or elute as very broad peaks from the nano column which results in a reduced peptide identification rate (7 out of 15). Moreover, the methods applied were found to be very well suited for the analysis of the acetylated, nitrated and methylated peptides. All 36 synthetic peptides, which exhibit one of those modifications, could be identified regardless of the method applied. As a final step in this study and as a proof of principle, the phosphoproteome enriched from PC‐12 pheochromocytoma cells was analyzed by CE‐MS resulting in 5686 identified and 4088 quantified phosphopeptides. We compared the characterized analytes to those identified by a nanoLC‐MS proteomics study and found that less than one third of the phosphopeptides were identical, which demonstrates the benefit by combining different approaches quite impressively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6001557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60015572018-06-21 Investigating capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry for the analysis of common post‐translational modifications Faserl, Klaus Sarg, Bettina Gruber, Peter Lindner, Herbert H. Electrophoresis Part II. CE‐MS and LC‐MS Bioanalytical Application Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry is a very efficient analytical method for the analysis of post‐translational modifications because of its high separation efficiency and high detection sensitivity. Here we applied CE‐MS using three differently coated separation capillaries for in‐depth analysis of a set of 70 synthetic post‐translationally modified peptides (including phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, and nitration). We evaluated the results in terms of peptide detection and separation characteristics and found that the use of a neutrally coated capillary resulted in highest overall signal intensity of singly modified peptides. In contrast, the use of a bare‐fused silica capillary was superior in the identification of multi‐phosphorylated peptides (12 out of 15 were identified). Fast separations of approximately 12 min could be achieved using a positively coated capillary, however, at the cost of separation efficiency. A comparison to nanoLC‐MS revealed that multi‐phosphorylated peptides interact with the RP material very poorly so that these peptides were either washed out or elute as very broad peaks from the nano column which results in a reduced peptide identification rate (7 out of 15). Moreover, the methods applied were found to be very well suited for the analysis of the acetylated, nitrated and methylated peptides. All 36 synthetic peptides, which exhibit one of those modifications, could be identified regardless of the method applied. As a final step in this study and as a proof of principle, the phosphoproteome enriched from PC‐12 pheochromocytoma cells was analyzed by CE‐MS resulting in 5686 identified and 4088 quantified phosphopeptides. We compared the characterized analytes to those identified by a nanoLC‐MS proteomics study and found that less than one third of the phosphopeptides were identical, which demonstrates the benefit by combining different approaches quite impressively. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-08 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6001557/ /pubmed/29389038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.201700437 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Electrophoresis published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Part II. CE‐MS and LC‐MS Bioanalytical Application
Faserl, Klaus
Sarg, Bettina
Gruber, Peter
Lindner, Herbert H.
Investigating capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry for the analysis of common post‐translational modifications
title Investigating capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry for the analysis of common post‐translational modifications
title_full Investigating capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry for the analysis of common post‐translational modifications
title_fullStr Investigating capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry for the analysis of common post‐translational modifications
title_full_unstemmed Investigating capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry for the analysis of common post‐translational modifications
title_short Investigating capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry for the analysis of common post‐translational modifications
title_sort investigating capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry for the analysis of common post‐translational modifications
topic Part II. CE‐MS and LC‐MS Bioanalytical Application
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29389038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.201700437
work_keys_str_mv AT faserlklaus investigatingcapillaryelectrophoresismassspectrometryfortheanalysisofcommonposttranslationalmodifications
AT sargbettina investigatingcapillaryelectrophoresismassspectrometryfortheanalysisofcommonposttranslationalmodifications
AT gruberpeter investigatingcapillaryelectrophoresismassspectrometryfortheanalysisofcommonposttranslationalmodifications
AT lindnerherberth investigatingcapillaryelectrophoresismassspectrometryfortheanalysisofcommonposttranslationalmodifications