Cargando…
Addressing the estimation of standard errors in fixed effects meta‐analysis
Standard methods for fixed effects meta‐analysis assume that standard errors for study‐specific estimates are known, not estimated. While the impact of this simplifying assumption has been shown in a few special cases, its general impact is not well understood, nor are general‐purpose tools availabl...
Autores principales: | Domínguez Islas, Clara, Rice, Kenneth M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29574827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.7625 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Improving the error rates of the Begg and Mazumdar test for publication bias in fixed effects meta-analysis
por: Gjerdevik, Miriam, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
FixItFelix: improving genomic analysis by fixing reference errors
por: Behera, Sairam, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
An Improvement in Estimation of the Standard Error for the Natural Direct Effect in Causal Mediation Analysis
por: Gao, Xin, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Standard Error of Empirical Bayes Estimate in NONMEM® VI
por: Kang, Dongwoo, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Estimation of the average treatment effect with variable selection
and measurement error simultaneously addressed for potential
confounders
por: Yi, Grace Y., et al.
Publicado: (2023)