Cargando…

Associations Between Polypharmacy and Cognitive and Physical Capability: A British Birth Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES: To investigate longitudinal associations between polypharmacy and cognitive and physical capability and to determine whether these associations differ with cumulative exposure to polypharmacy. DESIGN: Prospective birth cohort study. SETTING: England, Scotland, and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: An...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rawle, Mark James, Cooper, Rachel, Kuh, Diana, Richards, Marcus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29574684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15317
_version_ 1783332045549731840
author Rawle, Mark James
Cooper, Rachel
Kuh, Diana
Richards, Marcus
author_facet Rawle, Mark James
Cooper, Rachel
Kuh, Diana
Richards, Marcus
author_sort Rawle, Mark James
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate longitudinal associations between polypharmacy and cognitive and physical capability and to determine whether these associations differ with cumulative exposure to polypharmacy. DESIGN: Prospective birth cohort study. SETTING: England, Scotland, and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: An eligible sample of men and women from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development with medication data at age 69 (N=2,122, 79%). MEASUREMENTS: Cognitive capability was assessed using a word learning test, visual search speed task, and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, Third Edition (ACE‐III). Physical capability was measured using chair rise speed, standing balance time, walking speed, and grip strength. RESULTS: Polypharmacy (5–8 prescribed medications) was present in 18.2% of participants at age 69 and excessive polypharmacy (≥9 prescribed medications) in 4.7%. Both were associated with poorer cognitive and physical capability in models adjusted for sex, education, and disease burden. Stronger associations were found for excessive polypharmacy (e.g., difference in mean ACE‐III scores comparing polypharmacy=−2.0, 95% CI=−2.8 to −1.1 and excessive polypharmacy=−2.9, 95% CI=−4.4 to −1.4 with no polypharmacy). Participants with polypharmacy at age 60 to 64 and at age 69 showed stronger Negative associations with cognitive and physical capability were stronger still in participants with polypharmacy at both age 60 to 64 and at age 69 (e.g. difference in mean chair rise speed, comparing polypharmacy with no polypharmacy at both ages=−3.9, 95% CI=−5.2 to −2.6 and at age 60–64 only=−2.5, 95% CI=−4.1 to −0.9). CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy at age 60 to 64 and age 69 was associated with poorer physical and cognitive capability, even after adjusting for disease burden. Stronger negative associations were seen in participants with longstanding polypharmacy, suggesting a cumulative, dose‐dependent relationship (where dose is the number of prescribed medications). Future research aiming to improve cognitive and physical capability should consider interventions to reduce the duration and level of polypharmacy at younger ages, in addition to optimizing disease control with appropriate medications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6001617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60016172018-06-21 Associations Between Polypharmacy and Cognitive and Physical Capability: A British Birth Cohort Study Rawle, Mark James Cooper, Rachel Kuh, Diana Richards, Marcus J Am Geriatr Soc Clinical Investigations OBJECTIVES: To investigate longitudinal associations between polypharmacy and cognitive and physical capability and to determine whether these associations differ with cumulative exposure to polypharmacy. DESIGN: Prospective birth cohort study. SETTING: England, Scotland, and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: An eligible sample of men and women from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development with medication data at age 69 (N=2,122, 79%). MEASUREMENTS: Cognitive capability was assessed using a word learning test, visual search speed task, and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, Third Edition (ACE‐III). Physical capability was measured using chair rise speed, standing balance time, walking speed, and grip strength. RESULTS: Polypharmacy (5–8 prescribed medications) was present in 18.2% of participants at age 69 and excessive polypharmacy (≥9 prescribed medications) in 4.7%. Both were associated with poorer cognitive and physical capability in models adjusted for sex, education, and disease burden. Stronger associations were found for excessive polypharmacy (e.g., difference in mean ACE‐III scores comparing polypharmacy=−2.0, 95% CI=−2.8 to −1.1 and excessive polypharmacy=−2.9, 95% CI=−4.4 to −1.4 with no polypharmacy). Participants with polypharmacy at age 60 to 64 and at age 69 showed stronger Negative associations with cognitive and physical capability were stronger still in participants with polypharmacy at both age 60 to 64 and at age 69 (e.g. difference in mean chair rise speed, comparing polypharmacy with no polypharmacy at both ages=−3.9, 95% CI=−5.2 to −2.6 and at age 60–64 only=−2.5, 95% CI=−4.1 to −0.9). CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy at age 60 to 64 and age 69 was associated with poorer physical and cognitive capability, even after adjusting for disease burden. Stronger negative associations were seen in participants with longstanding polypharmacy, suggesting a cumulative, dose‐dependent relationship (where dose is the number of prescribed medications). Future research aiming to improve cognitive and physical capability should consider interventions to reduce the duration and level of polypharmacy at younger ages, in addition to optimizing disease control with appropriate medications. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-24 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6001617/ /pubmed/29574684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15317 Text en © 2018 The Authors. The Journal of the American Geriatrics Society published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Geriatrics Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Rawle, Mark James
Cooper, Rachel
Kuh, Diana
Richards, Marcus
Associations Between Polypharmacy and Cognitive and Physical Capability: A British Birth Cohort Study
title Associations Between Polypharmacy and Cognitive and Physical Capability: A British Birth Cohort Study
title_full Associations Between Polypharmacy and Cognitive and Physical Capability: A British Birth Cohort Study
title_fullStr Associations Between Polypharmacy and Cognitive and Physical Capability: A British Birth Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Associations Between Polypharmacy and Cognitive and Physical Capability: A British Birth Cohort Study
title_short Associations Between Polypharmacy and Cognitive and Physical Capability: A British Birth Cohort Study
title_sort associations between polypharmacy and cognitive and physical capability: a british birth cohort study
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29574684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15317
work_keys_str_mv AT rawlemarkjames associationsbetweenpolypharmacyandcognitiveandphysicalcapabilityabritishbirthcohortstudy
AT cooperrachel associationsbetweenpolypharmacyandcognitiveandphysicalcapabilityabritishbirthcohortstudy
AT kuhdiana associationsbetweenpolypharmacyandcognitiveandphysicalcapabilityabritishbirthcohortstudy
AT richardsmarcus associationsbetweenpolypharmacyandcognitiveandphysicalcapabilityabritishbirthcohortstudy