Cargando…

Sex-based differences in anti-predator response of crickets to chemical cues of a mammalian predator

Anti-predator behaviors like vigilance or hiding come at the expense of other fitness increasing behaviors such as foraging. To compensate for this trade-off, prey assess predation risk and modify the frequency of anti-predator behaviors according to the likelihood of the threat. In this study, we t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanis, Brian P., Bott, Bradley, Gaston, Brian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910976
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4923
_version_ 1783332067193389056
author Tanis, Brian P.
Bott, Bradley
Gaston, Brian J.
author_facet Tanis, Brian P.
Bott, Bradley
Gaston, Brian J.
author_sort Tanis, Brian P.
collection PubMed
description Anti-predator behaviors like vigilance or hiding come at the expense of other fitness increasing behaviors such as foraging. To compensate for this trade-off, prey assess predation risk and modify the frequency of anti-predator behaviors according to the likelihood of the threat. In this study, we tested the ability of house crickets (Acheta domesticus) to indirectly assess predation risk via odors from a mammalian predator, Elliot’s short-tailed shrew (Blarina hylophaga). As natural differences in encounter rates and predation risk differs between sexes, we tested if male and female crickets perceive similar rates of predation risk from the presence of shrew odor measured via anti-predator behavioral response. Crickets were placed in enclosed, cardboard-lined chambers either treated with shrew odor or control, along with a food source. Time until foraging was measured for each individual and compared across treatment and sex. We found that in the presence of shrew odor, female crickets delayed foraging while males showed no response. These results suggest adult crickets can use chemical cues to detect mammalian predators. Furthermore, we demonstrate that female crickets associate greater predation risk from shrew predators than do male crickets, which are more stationary yet acoustically conspicuous. As predation risk potentially differs drastically for each sex, changes to the operational sex ratios of wild cricket populations could be influenced by the identity of the predator community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6001705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60017052018-06-15 Sex-based differences in anti-predator response of crickets to chemical cues of a mammalian predator Tanis, Brian P. Bott, Bradley Gaston, Brian J. PeerJ Animal Behavior Anti-predator behaviors like vigilance or hiding come at the expense of other fitness increasing behaviors such as foraging. To compensate for this trade-off, prey assess predation risk and modify the frequency of anti-predator behaviors according to the likelihood of the threat. In this study, we tested the ability of house crickets (Acheta domesticus) to indirectly assess predation risk via odors from a mammalian predator, Elliot’s short-tailed shrew (Blarina hylophaga). As natural differences in encounter rates and predation risk differs between sexes, we tested if male and female crickets perceive similar rates of predation risk from the presence of shrew odor measured via anti-predator behavioral response. Crickets were placed in enclosed, cardboard-lined chambers either treated with shrew odor or control, along with a food source. Time until foraging was measured for each individual and compared across treatment and sex. We found that in the presence of shrew odor, female crickets delayed foraging while males showed no response. These results suggest adult crickets can use chemical cues to detect mammalian predators. Furthermore, we demonstrate that female crickets associate greater predation risk from shrew predators than do male crickets, which are more stationary yet acoustically conspicuous. As predation risk potentially differs drastically for each sex, changes to the operational sex ratios of wild cricket populations could be influenced by the identity of the predator community. PeerJ Inc. 2018-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6001705/ /pubmed/29910976 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4923 Text en ©2018 Tanis et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Animal Behavior
Tanis, Brian P.
Bott, Bradley
Gaston, Brian J.
Sex-based differences in anti-predator response of crickets to chemical cues of a mammalian predator
title Sex-based differences in anti-predator response of crickets to chemical cues of a mammalian predator
title_full Sex-based differences in anti-predator response of crickets to chemical cues of a mammalian predator
title_fullStr Sex-based differences in anti-predator response of crickets to chemical cues of a mammalian predator
title_full_unstemmed Sex-based differences in anti-predator response of crickets to chemical cues of a mammalian predator
title_short Sex-based differences in anti-predator response of crickets to chemical cues of a mammalian predator
title_sort sex-based differences in anti-predator response of crickets to chemical cues of a mammalian predator
topic Animal Behavior
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910976
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4923
work_keys_str_mv AT tanisbrianp sexbaseddifferencesinantipredatorresponseofcricketstochemicalcuesofamammalianpredator
AT bottbradley sexbaseddifferencesinantipredatorresponseofcricketstochemicalcuesofamammalianpredator
AT gastonbrianj sexbaseddifferencesinantipredatorresponseofcricketstochemicalcuesofamammalianpredator