Cargando…

Timing of sperm capacitation varies reproducibly among men

Sperm must mature functionally in the process of capacitation to become able to fertilize. Capacitation depends on membrane lipid changes, and can be quantitatively assessed by redistribution of the ganglioside G(M1), the basis of the Cap‐Score™ sperm function test. Here, differences in Cap‐Score we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ostermeier, G. Charles, Cardona, Cristina, Moody, Melissa A., Simpson, Alana J., Mendoza, Romeo, Seaman, Eric, Travis, Alexander J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29521463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22972
_version_ 1783332073069608960
author Ostermeier, G. Charles
Cardona, Cristina
Moody, Melissa A.
Simpson, Alana J.
Mendoza, Romeo
Seaman, Eric
Travis, Alexander J.
author_facet Ostermeier, G. Charles
Cardona, Cristina
Moody, Melissa A.
Simpson, Alana J.
Mendoza, Romeo
Seaman, Eric
Travis, Alexander J.
author_sort Ostermeier, G. Charles
collection PubMed
description Sperm must mature functionally in the process of capacitation to become able to fertilize. Capacitation depends on membrane lipid changes, and can be quantitatively assessed by redistribution of the ganglioside G(M1), the basis of the Cap‐Score™ sperm function test. Here, differences in Cap‐Score were compared among and within men at two time points. Ejaculates were liquefied, washed, and incubated for 3 hr under capacitating (Cap) conditions, then fixed and analyzed immediately (Day0); after being incubated 3 hr under Cap conditions then maintained 22–24 hr in fix (Day1‐fix); or after 22–24 hr incubation under Cap conditions prior to fixation (Day1). In all cases, a light fixative previously shown to allow membrane lipid movements was used. Day1‐fix and Day1 Cap‐Scores were greater than Day0 (p < 0.001; n = 25), whereas Day1‐fix and Day1 Cap‐Scores were equivalent (p = 0.43; n = 25). In 123 samples from 52 fertile men, Cap‐Score increased more than 1SD (7.7; calculated previously from a fertile cohort) from Day0 to Day1‐fix in 44% (54/123) of the samples. To test whether timing of capacitation was consistent within an individual, 52 samples from 11 fertile men were classified into either “early” or “late” capacitation groups. The average capacitation group concordance within a donor was 81%. Median absolute deviation (MAD; in Cap‐Score units) was used to assess the tightness of clustering of the difference from Day0 to Day1‐fix within individuals. The average (2.21) and median (1.98) MAD confirmed consistency within individuals. Together, these data show that the timing of capacitation differed among men and was consistent within men.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6001750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60017502018-06-21 Timing of sperm capacitation varies reproducibly among men Ostermeier, G. Charles Cardona, Cristina Moody, Melissa A. Simpson, Alana J. Mendoza, Romeo Seaman, Eric Travis, Alexander J. Mol Reprod Dev Research Articles Sperm must mature functionally in the process of capacitation to become able to fertilize. Capacitation depends on membrane lipid changes, and can be quantitatively assessed by redistribution of the ganglioside G(M1), the basis of the Cap‐Score™ sperm function test. Here, differences in Cap‐Score were compared among and within men at two time points. Ejaculates were liquefied, washed, and incubated for 3 hr under capacitating (Cap) conditions, then fixed and analyzed immediately (Day0); after being incubated 3 hr under Cap conditions then maintained 22–24 hr in fix (Day1‐fix); or after 22–24 hr incubation under Cap conditions prior to fixation (Day1). In all cases, a light fixative previously shown to allow membrane lipid movements was used. Day1‐fix and Day1 Cap‐Scores were greater than Day0 (p < 0.001; n = 25), whereas Day1‐fix and Day1 Cap‐Scores were equivalent (p = 0.43; n = 25). In 123 samples from 52 fertile men, Cap‐Score increased more than 1SD (7.7; calculated previously from a fertile cohort) from Day0 to Day1‐fix in 44% (54/123) of the samples. To test whether timing of capacitation was consistent within an individual, 52 samples from 11 fertile men were classified into either “early” or “late” capacitation groups. The average capacitation group concordance within a donor was 81%. Median absolute deviation (MAD; in Cap‐Score units) was used to assess the tightness of clustering of the difference from Day0 to Day1‐fix within individuals. The average (2.21) and median (1.98) MAD confirmed consistency within individuals. Together, these data show that the timing of capacitation differed among men and was consistent within men. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-02 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6001750/ /pubmed/29521463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22972 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Molecular Reproduction and Development Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Ostermeier, G. Charles
Cardona, Cristina
Moody, Melissa A.
Simpson, Alana J.
Mendoza, Romeo
Seaman, Eric
Travis, Alexander J.
Timing of sperm capacitation varies reproducibly among men
title Timing of sperm capacitation varies reproducibly among men
title_full Timing of sperm capacitation varies reproducibly among men
title_fullStr Timing of sperm capacitation varies reproducibly among men
title_full_unstemmed Timing of sperm capacitation varies reproducibly among men
title_short Timing of sperm capacitation varies reproducibly among men
title_sort timing of sperm capacitation varies reproducibly among men
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29521463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22972
work_keys_str_mv AT ostermeiergcharles timingofspermcapacitationvariesreproduciblyamongmen
AT cardonacristina timingofspermcapacitationvariesreproduciblyamongmen
AT moodymelissaa timingofspermcapacitationvariesreproduciblyamongmen
AT simpsonalanaj timingofspermcapacitationvariesreproduciblyamongmen
AT mendozaromeo timingofspermcapacitationvariesreproduciblyamongmen
AT seamaneric timingofspermcapacitationvariesreproduciblyamongmen
AT travisalexanderj timingofspermcapacitationvariesreproduciblyamongmen