Cargando…

Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire: psychometric testing of a new instrument

BACKGROUND: Patients attend primary care for many reasons and to achieve a range of possible outcomes. There is currently no Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) designed to capture these diverse outcomes, and trials of interventions in primary care may thus fail to detect beneficial effects. AIM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Mairead, Hollinghurst, Sandra, Cowlishaw, Sean, Salisbury, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29581130
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X695765
_version_ 1783332122908426240
author Murphy, Mairead
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Cowlishaw, Sean
Salisbury, Chris
author_facet Murphy, Mairead
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Cowlishaw, Sean
Salisbury, Chris
author_sort Murphy, Mairead
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients attend primary care for many reasons and to achieve a range of possible outcomes. There is currently no Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) designed to capture these diverse outcomes, and trials of interventions in primary care may thus fail to detect beneficial effects. AIM: This study describes the psychometric testing of the Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire (PCOQ), which was designed to capture a broad range of outcomes relevant to primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Questionnaires were administered in primary care in South West England. METHOD: Patients completed the PCOQ in GP waiting rooms before a consultation, and a second questionnaire, including the PCOQ and seven comparator PROMs, after 1 week. Psychometric testing included exploratory factor analysis on the PCOQ, internal consistency, correlation coefficients between domain scores and comparator measures, and repeated measures effect sizes indicating change across 1 week. RESULTS: In total, 602 patients completed the PCOQ at baseline, and 264 (44%) returned the follow-up questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis suggested four dimensions underlying the PCOQ items: health and wellbeing, health knowledge and self-care, confidence in health provision, and confidence in health plan. Each dimension was internally consistent and correlated as expected with comparator PROMs, providing evidence of construct validity. Patients reporting an improvement in their main problem exhibited small to moderate improvements in relevant domain scores on the PCOQ. CONCLUSION: The PCOQ was acceptable, feasible, showed strong psychometric properties, and was responsive to change. It is a promising new tool for assessment of outcomes of primary care interventions from a patient perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6001981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60019812018-07-06 Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire: psychometric testing of a new instrument Murphy, Mairead Hollinghurst, Sandra Cowlishaw, Sean Salisbury, Chris Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Patients attend primary care for many reasons and to achieve a range of possible outcomes. There is currently no Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) designed to capture these diverse outcomes, and trials of interventions in primary care may thus fail to detect beneficial effects. AIM: This study describes the psychometric testing of the Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire (PCOQ), which was designed to capture a broad range of outcomes relevant to primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Questionnaires were administered in primary care in South West England. METHOD: Patients completed the PCOQ in GP waiting rooms before a consultation, and a second questionnaire, including the PCOQ and seven comparator PROMs, after 1 week. Psychometric testing included exploratory factor analysis on the PCOQ, internal consistency, correlation coefficients between domain scores and comparator measures, and repeated measures effect sizes indicating change across 1 week. RESULTS: In total, 602 patients completed the PCOQ at baseline, and 264 (44%) returned the follow-up questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis suggested four dimensions underlying the PCOQ items: health and wellbeing, health knowledge and self-care, confidence in health provision, and confidence in health plan. Each dimension was internally consistent and correlated as expected with comparator PROMs, providing evidence of construct validity. Patients reporting an improvement in their main problem exhibited small to moderate improvements in relevant domain scores on the PCOQ. CONCLUSION: The PCOQ was acceptable, feasible, showed strong psychometric properties, and was responsive to change. It is a promising new tool for assessment of outcomes of primary care interventions from a patient perspective. Royal College of General Practitioners 2018-06 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6001981/ /pubmed/29581130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X695765 Text en © British Journal of General Practice 2018 This article is Open Access: CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research
Murphy, Mairead
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Cowlishaw, Sean
Salisbury, Chris
Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire: psychometric testing of a new instrument
title Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire: psychometric testing of a new instrument
title_full Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire: psychometric testing of a new instrument
title_fullStr Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire: psychometric testing of a new instrument
title_full_unstemmed Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire: psychometric testing of a new instrument
title_short Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire: psychometric testing of a new instrument
title_sort primary care outcomes questionnaire: psychometric testing of a new instrument
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29581130
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X695765
work_keys_str_mv AT murphymairead primarycareoutcomesquestionnairepsychometrictestingofanewinstrument
AT hollinghurstsandra primarycareoutcomesquestionnairepsychometrictestingofanewinstrument
AT cowlishawsean primarycareoutcomesquestionnairepsychometrictestingofanewinstrument
AT salisburychris primarycareoutcomesquestionnairepsychometrictestingofanewinstrument