Cargando…

Risk perception and the influence on uptake and use of biomedical prevention interventions for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: Risk perception has been found to be a crucial factor explaining inconsistent or non-use of HIV prevention interventions. Considerations of risk need to expand beyond risk of infection to also include the personal, social, emotional, and economic risks associated with prevention interven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warren, Emily A., Paterson, Pauline, Schulz, William S., Lees, Shelley, Eakle, Robyn, Stadler, Jonathan, Larson, Heidi J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6002067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29902205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198680
_version_ 1783332135832125440
author Warren, Emily A.
Paterson, Pauline
Schulz, William S.
Lees, Shelley
Eakle, Robyn
Stadler, Jonathan
Larson, Heidi J.
author_facet Warren, Emily A.
Paterson, Pauline
Schulz, William S.
Lees, Shelley
Eakle, Robyn
Stadler, Jonathan
Larson, Heidi J.
author_sort Warren, Emily A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Risk perception has been found to be a crucial factor explaining inconsistent or non-use of HIV prevention interventions. Considerations of risk need to expand beyond risk of infection to also include the personal, social, emotional, and economic risks associated with prevention intervention use. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review of qualitative peer-reviewed literature from sub-Saharan Africa examines perceptions of risk associated with HIV infection and HIV prevention intervention use. DATA SOURCES: We searched Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, Africa Wide Info, CINAHL, and Global Health for publications and screened them for relevance. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Peer-reviewed qualitative studies published since 2003 were eligible for inclusion if they examined risk perception or uncertainty in the context of a medically regulated intervention. Only studies focusing on adults were included. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Included publications were quality assessed using the Hawker method and coded thematically. RESULTS: 10318 unique papers were identified, of which 29 are included. Among the themes identified, a particularly salient one was the potential of HIV prevention interventions to threaten the stability of a relationship and impact on how and when people may—or may not—choose to use prevention interventions. LIMITATIONS: This literature review excludes grey-literature, which may have distinct valuable insights. We also excluded quantitative studies that may have challenged or triangulated our findings. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: When considering the risk of HIV acquisition, it is insufficient to examine biological risk in isolation from the personal, relational and economic costs associated with intervention use. This loss of emotional, physical, or material support may be perceived as more consequential than the prevention of a potential infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6002067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60020672018-06-25 Risk perception and the influence on uptake and use of biomedical prevention interventions for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review Warren, Emily A. Paterson, Pauline Schulz, William S. Lees, Shelley Eakle, Robyn Stadler, Jonathan Larson, Heidi J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Risk perception has been found to be a crucial factor explaining inconsistent or non-use of HIV prevention interventions. Considerations of risk need to expand beyond risk of infection to also include the personal, social, emotional, and economic risks associated with prevention intervention use. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review of qualitative peer-reviewed literature from sub-Saharan Africa examines perceptions of risk associated with HIV infection and HIV prevention intervention use. DATA SOURCES: We searched Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, Africa Wide Info, CINAHL, and Global Health for publications and screened them for relevance. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Peer-reviewed qualitative studies published since 2003 were eligible for inclusion if they examined risk perception or uncertainty in the context of a medically regulated intervention. Only studies focusing on adults were included. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Included publications were quality assessed using the Hawker method and coded thematically. RESULTS: 10318 unique papers were identified, of which 29 are included. Among the themes identified, a particularly salient one was the potential of HIV prevention interventions to threaten the stability of a relationship and impact on how and when people may—or may not—choose to use prevention interventions. LIMITATIONS: This literature review excludes grey-literature, which may have distinct valuable insights. We also excluded quantitative studies that may have challenged or triangulated our findings. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: When considering the risk of HIV acquisition, it is insufficient to examine biological risk in isolation from the personal, relational and economic costs associated with intervention use. This loss of emotional, physical, or material support may be perceived as more consequential than the prevention of a potential infection. Public Library of Science 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6002067/ /pubmed/29902205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198680 Text en © 2018 Warren et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Warren, Emily A.
Paterson, Pauline
Schulz, William S.
Lees, Shelley
Eakle, Robyn
Stadler, Jonathan
Larson, Heidi J.
Risk perception and the influence on uptake and use of biomedical prevention interventions for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review
title Risk perception and the influence on uptake and use of biomedical prevention interventions for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review
title_full Risk perception and the influence on uptake and use of biomedical prevention interventions for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review
title_fullStr Risk perception and the influence on uptake and use of biomedical prevention interventions for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Risk perception and the influence on uptake and use of biomedical prevention interventions for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review
title_short Risk perception and the influence on uptake and use of biomedical prevention interventions for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review
title_sort risk perception and the influence on uptake and use of biomedical prevention interventions for hiv in sub-saharan africa: a systematic literature review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6002067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29902205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198680
work_keys_str_mv AT warrenemilya riskperceptionandtheinfluenceonuptakeanduseofbiomedicalpreventioninterventionsforhivinsubsaharanafricaasystematicliteraturereview
AT patersonpauline riskperceptionandtheinfluenceonuptakeanduseofbiomedicalpreventioninterventionsforhivinsubsaharanafricaasystematicliteraturereview
AT schulzwilliams riskperceptionandtheinfluenceonuptakeanduseofbiomedicalpreventioninterventionsforhivinsubsaharanafricaasystematicliteraturereview
AT leesshelley riskperceptionandtheinfluenceonuptakeanduseofbiomedicalpreventioninterventionsforhivinsubsaharanafricaasystematicliteraturereview
AT eaklerobyn riskperceptionandtheinfluenceonuptakeanduseofbiomedicalpreventioninterventionsforhivinsubsaharanafricaasystematicliteraturereview
AT stadlerjonathan riskperceptionandtheinfluenceonuptakeanduseofbiomedicalpreventioninterventionsforhivinsubsaharanafricaasystematicliteraturereview
AT larsonheidij riskperceptionandtheinfluenceonuptakeanduseofbiomedicalpreventioninterventionsforhivinsubsaharanafricaasystematicliteraturereview