Cargando…

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Modified Mini-Open and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of modified mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (modMOTLIF) and open TLIF (OTLIF). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MTLIF) is associated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ganesan, Sudhir, Jayabalan, Vignesh, Kumar, Venkatesh, Kailash, Karthik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6002170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879783
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.544
_version_ 1783332159570837504
author Ganesan, Sudhir
Jayabalan, Vignesh
Kumar, Venkatesh
Kailash, Karthik
author_facet Ganesan, Sudhir
Jayabalan, Vignesh
Kumar, Venkatesh
Kailash, Karthik
author_sort Ganesan, Sudhir
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of modified mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (modMOTLIF) and open TLIF (OTLIF). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MTLIF) is associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and less pain. However, it has concerns like increased radiation exposure, steep learning curve, and instrumentation cost. We modified the MTLIF technique by direct freehand insertion of pedicle screws using stab incisions without tubular retractors. METHODS: The study included 24 patients in the modMOTLIF group and 27 patients in the OTLIF group. The average follow-up period was 25.6 months. Clinical outcomes were measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Serial X-rays were acquired at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months to assess the union and presence of instability. We also compared blood loss and length of hospital stay in both groups. RESULTS: All patients showed progressive improvement in VAS and ODI scores. No differences were observed in the preoperative and postoperative ODI and VAS leg scores between the groups. The immediate postoperative VAS back score was significantly higher in the OTLIF group than in the modMOTLIF group; however, no difference was observed at 1 and 2 years. Radiological analysis showed nonunion in one and two patients in the OTLIF and modMOTLIF groups, respectively. The average blood loss was 63 mL in the mod-MOTLIF group and 254 mL in the OTLIF group. The mean hospital stay was 3 days for the modMOTLIF group and 5 days for the OTLIF group. CONCLUSIONS: modMOTLIF was associated with reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stay compared with OTLIF. No significant differences were observed in the clinical and radiological outcomes between the groups after 2 years despite reduced back pain in the immediate postoperative period in patients who underwent modMOTLIF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6002170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60021702018-06-21 Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Modified Mini-Open and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study Ganesan, Sudhir Jayabalan, Vignesh Kumar, Venkatesh Kailash, Karthik Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of modified mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (modMOTLIF) and open TLIF (OTLIF). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MTLIF) is associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and less pain. However, it has concerns like increased radiation exposure, steep learning curve, and instrumentation cost. We modified the MTLIF technique by direct freehand insertion of pedicle screws using stab incisions without tubular retractors. METHODS: The study included 24 patients in the modMOTLIF group and 27 patients in the OTLIF group. The average follow-up period was 25.6 months. Clinical outcomes were measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Serial X-rays were acquired at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months to assess the union and presence of instability. We also compared blood loss and length of hospital stay in both groups. RESULTS: All patients showed progressive improvement in VAS and ODI scores. No differences were observed in the preoperative and postoperative ODI and VAS leg scores between the groups. The immediate postoperative VAS back score was significantly higher in the OTLIF group than in the modMOTLIF group; however, no difference was observed at 1 and 2 years. Radiological analysis showed nonunion in one and two patients in the OTLIF and modMOTLIF groups, respectively. The average blood loss was 63 mL in the mod-MOTLIF group and 254 mL in the OTLIF group. The mean hospital stay was 3 days for the modMOTLIF group and 5 days for the OTLIF group. CONCLUSIONS: modMOTLIF was associated with reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stay compared with OTLIF. No significant differences were observed in the clinical and radiological outcomes between the groups after 2 years despite reduced back pain in the immediate postoperative period in patients who underwent modMOTLIF. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2018-06 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6002170/ /pubmed/29879783 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.544 Text en Copyright © 2018 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Ganesan, Sudhir
Jayabalan, Vignesh
Kumar, Venkatesh
Kailash, Karthik
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Modified Mini-Open and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study
title Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Modified Mini-Open and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study
title_full Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Modified Mini-Open and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Modified Mini-Open and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Modified Mini-Open and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study
title_short Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Modified Mini-Open and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study
title_sort clinical and radiological outcomes of modified mini-open and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6002170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29879783
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.544
work_keys_str_mv AT ganesansudhir clinicalandradiologicaloutcomesofmodifiedminiopenandopentransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionacomparativestudy
AT jayabalanvignesh clinicalandradiologicaloutcomesofmodifiedminiopenandopentransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionacomparativestudy
AT kumarvenkatesh clinicalandradiologicaloutcomesofmodifiedminiopenandopentransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionacomparativestudy
AT kailashkarthik clinicalandradiologicaloutcomesofmodifiedminiopenandopentransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionacomparativestudy