Cargando…

Response inhibition on the stop signal task improves during cardiac contraction

Motor actions can be facilitated or hindered by psychophysiological states of readiness, to guide rapid adaptive action. Cardiovascular arousal is communicated by cardiac signals conveying the timing and strength of individual heartbeats. Here, we tested how these interoceptive signals facilitate co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rae, Charlotte L., Botan, Vanessa E., Gould van Praag, Cassandra D., Herman, Aleksandra M., Nyyssönen, Jasmina A. K., Watson, David R., Duka, Theodora, Garfinkel, Sarah N., Critchley, Hugo D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6002409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29904123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27513-y
_version_ 1783332197681332224
author Rae, Charlotte L.
Botan, Vanessa E.
Gould van Praag, Cassandra D.
Herman, Aleksandra M.
Nyyssönen, Jasmina A. K.
Watson, David R.
Duka, Theodora
Garfinkel, Sarah N.
Critchley, Hugo D.
author_facet Rae, Charlotte L.
Botan, Vanessa E.
Gould van Praag, Cassandra D.
Herman, Aleksandra M.
Nyyssönen, Jasmina A. K.
Watson, David R.
Duka, Theodora
Garfinkel, Sarah N.
Critchley, Hugo D.
author_sort Rae, Charlotte L.
collection PubMed
description Motor actions can be facilitated or hindered by psychophysiological states of readiness, to guide rapid adaptive action. Cardiovascular arousal is communicated by cardiac signals conveying the timing and strength of individual heartbeats. Here, we tested how these interoceptive signals facilitate control of motor impulsivity. Participants performed a stop signal task, in which stop cues were delivered at different time points within the cardiac cycle: at systole when the heart contracts (T-wave peak, approximately 300 ms following the R-wave), or at diastole between heartbeats (R-wave peak). Response inhibition was better at systole, indexed by a shorter stop signal reaction time (SSRT), and longer stop signal delay (SSD). Furthermore, parasympathetic control of cardiovascular tone, and subjective sensitivity to interoceptive states, predicted response inhibition efficiency, although these cardiovascular and interoceptive correlations did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. This suggests that response inhibition capacity is influenced by interoceptive physiological cues, such that people are more likely to express impulsive actions during putative states of lower cardiovascular arousal, when frequency and strength of cardiac afferent signalling is reduced.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6002409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60024092018-06-26 Response inhibition on the stop signal task improves during cardiac contraction Rae, Charlotte L. Botan, Vanessa E. Gould van Praag, Cassandra D. Herman, Aleksandra M. Nyyssönen, Jasmina A. K. Watson, David R. Duka, Theodora Garfinkel, Sarah N. Critchley, Hugo D. Sci Rep Article Motor actions can be facilitated or hindered by psychophysiological states of readiness, to guide rapid adaptive action. Cardiovascular arousal is communicated by cardiac signals conveying the timing and strength of individual heartbeats. Here, we tested how these interoceptive signals facilitate control of motor impulsivity. Participants performed a stop signal task, in which stop cues were delivered at different time points within the cardiac cycle: at systole when the heart contracts (T-wave peak, approximately 300 ms following the R-wave), or at diastole between heartbeats (R-wave peak). Response inhibition was better at systole, indexed by a shorter stop signal reaction time (SSRT), and longer stop signal delay (SSD). Furthermore, parasympathetic control of cardiovascular tone, and subjective sensitivity to interoceptive states, predicted response inhibition efficiency, although these cardiovascular and interoceptive correlations did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. This suggests that response inhibition capacity is influenced by interoceptive physiological cues, such that people are more likely to express impulsive actions during putative states of lower cardiovascular arousal, when frequency and strength of cardiac afferent signalling is reduced. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6002409/ /pubmed/29904123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27513-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Rae, Charlotte L.
Botan, Vanessa E.
Gould van Praag, Cassandra D.
Herman, Aleksandra M.
Nyyssönen, Jasmina A. K.
Watson, David R.
Duka, Theodora
Garfinkel, Sarah N.
Critchley, Hugo D.
Response inhibition on the stop signal task improves during cardiac contraction
title Response inhibition on the stop signal task improves during cardiac contraction
title_full Response inhibition on the stop signal task improves during cardiac contraction
title_fullStr Response inhibition on the stop signal task improves during cardiac contraction
title_full_unstemmed Response inhibition on the stop signal task improves during cardiac contraction
title_short Response inhibition on the stop signal task improves during cardiac contraction
title_sort response inhibition on the stop signal task improves during cardiac contraction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6002409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29904123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27513-y
work_keys_str_mv AT raecharlottel responseinhibitiononthestopsignaltaskimprovesduringcardiaccontraction
AT botanvanessae responseinhibitiononthestopsignaltaskimprovesduringcardiaccontraction
AT gouldvanpraagcassandrad responseinhibitiononthestopsignaltaskimprovesduringcardiaccontraction
AT hermanaleksandram responseinhibitiononthestopsignaltaskimprovesduringcardiaccontraction
AT nyyssonenjasminaak responseinhibitiononthestopsignaltaskimprovesduringcardiaccontraction
AT watsondavidr responseinhibitiononthestopsignaltaskimprovesduringcardiaccontraction
AT dukatheodora responseinhibitiononthestopsignaltaskimprovesduringcardiaccontraction
AT garfinkelsarahn responseinhibitiononthestopsignaltaskimprovesduringcardiaccontraction
AT critchleyhugod responseinhibitiononthestopsignaltaskimprovesduringcardiaccontraction