Cargando…

Facilitation of motor excitability during listening to spoken sentences is not modulated by noise or semantic coherence

Comprehending speech can be particularly challenging in a noisy environment and in the absence of semantic context. It has been proposed that the articulatory motor system would be recruited especially in difficult listening conditions. However, it remains unknown how signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panouillères, Muriel T.N., Boyles, Rowan, Chesters, Jennifer, Watkins, Kate E., Möttönen, Riikka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Masson 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6002609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29554541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.007
_version_ 1783332246023831552
author Panouillères, Muriel T.N.
Boyles, Rowan
Chesters, Jennifer
Watkins, Kate E.
Möttönen, Riikka
author_facet Panouillères, Muriel T.N.
Boyles, Rowan
Chesters, Jennifer
Watkins, Kate E.
Möttönen, Riikka
author_sort Panouillères, Muriel T.N.
collection PubMed
description Comprehending speech can be particularly challenging in a noisy environment and in the absence of semantic context. It has been proposed that the articulatory motor system would be recruited especially in difficult listening conditions. However, it remains unknown how signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and semantic context affect the recruitment of the articulatory motor system when listening to continuous speech. The aim of the present study was to address the hypothesis that involvement of the articulatory motor cortex increases when the intelligibility and clarity of the spoken sentences decreases, because of noise and the lack of semantic context. We applied Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to the lip and hand representations in the primary motor cortex and measured motor evoked potentials from the lip and hand muscles, respectively, to evaluate motor excitability when young adults listened to sentences. In Experiment 1, we found that the excitability of the lip motor cortex was facilitated during listening to both semantically anomalous and coherent sentences in noise relative to non-speech baselines, but neither SNR nor semantic context modulated the facilitation. In Experiment 2, we replicated these findings and found no difference in the excitability of the lip motor cortex between sentences in noise and clear sentences without noise. Thus, our results show that the articulatory motor cortex is involved in speech processing even in optimal and ecologically valid listening conditions and that its involvement is not modulated by the intelligibility and clarity of speech.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6002609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Masson
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60026092018-06-18 Facilitation of motor excitability during listening to spoken sentences is not modulated by noise or semantic coherence Panouillères, Muriel T.N. Boyles, Rowan Chesters, Jennifer Watkins, Kate E. Möttönen, Riikka Cortex Article Comprehending speech can be particularly challenging in a noisy environment and in the absence of semantic context. It has been proposed that the articulatory motor system would be recruited especially in difficult listening conditions. However, it remains unknown how signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and semantic context affect the recruitment of the articulatory motor system when listening to continuous speech. The aim of the present study was to address the hypothesis that involvement of the articulatory motor cortex increases when the intelligibility and clarity of the spoken sentences decreases, because of noise and the lack of semantic context. We applied Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to the lip and hand representations in the primary motor cortex and measured motor evoked potentials from the lip and hand muscles, respectively, to evaluate motor excitability when young adults listened to sentences. In Experiment 1, we found that the excitability of the lip motor cortex was facilitated during listening to both semantically anomalous and coherent sentences in noise relative to non-speech baselines, but neither SNR nor semantic context modulated the facilitation. In Experiment 2, we replicated these findings and found no difference in the excitability of the lip motor cortex between sentences in noise and clear sentences without noise. Thus, our results show that the articulatory motor cortex is involved in speech processing even in optimal and ecologically valid listening conditions and that its involvement is not modulated by the intelligibility and clarity of speech. Masson 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6002609/ /pubmed/29554541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.007 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Panouillères, Muriel T.N.
Boyles, Rowan
Chesters, Jennifer
Watkins, Kate E.
Möttönen, Riikka
Facilitation of motor excitability during listening to spoken sentences is not modulated by noise or semantic coherence
title Facilitation of motor excitability during listening to spoken sentences is not modulated by noise or semantic coherence
title_full Facilitation of motor excitability during listening to spoken sentences is not modulated by noise or semantic coherence
title_fullStr Facilitation of motor excitability during listening to spoken sentences is not modulated by noise or semantic coherence
title_full_unstemmed Facilitation of motor excitability during listening to spoken sentences is not modulated by noise or semantic coherence
title_short Facilitation of motor excitability during listening to spoken sentences is not modulated by noise or semantic coherence
title_sort facilitation of motor excitability during listening to spoken sentences is not modulated by noise or semantic coherence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6002609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29554541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.007
work_keys_str_mv AT panouilleresmurieltn facilitationofmotorexcitabilityduringlisteningtospokensentencesisnotmodulatedbynoiseorsemanticcoherence
AT boylesrowan facilitationofmotorexcitabilityduringlisteningtospokensentencesisnotmodulatedbynoiseorsemanticcoherence
AT chestersjennifer facilitationofmotorexcitabilityduringlisteningtospokensentencesisnotmodulatedbynoiseorsemanticcoherence
AT watkinskatee facilitationofmotorexcitabilityduringlisteningtospokensentencesisnotmodulatedbynoiseorsemanticcoherence
AT mottonenriikka facilitationofmotorexcitabilityduringlisteningtospokensentencesisnotmodulatedbynoiseorsemanticcoherence