Cargando…

Exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Exon skipping has been considered a promising therapeutic approach for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Eteplirsen received conditional approval in the United States in 2016. To date, no systematic reviews or meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of exon skipping drugs h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shimizu-Motohashi, Yuko, Murakami, Terumi, Kimura, En, Komaki, Hirofumi, Watanabe, Norio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6003096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29907124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0834-2
_version_ 1783332304762961920
author Shimizu-Motohashi, Yuko
Murakami, Terumi
Kimura, En
Komaki, Hirofumi
Watanabe, Norio
author_facet Shimizu-Motohashi, Yuko
Murakami, Terumi
Kimura, En
Komaki, Hirofumi
Watanabe, Norio
author_sort Shimizu-Motohashi, Yuko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exon skipping has been considered a promising therapeutic approach for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Eteplirsen received conditional approval in the United States in 2016. To date, no systematic reviews or meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of exon skipping drugs have been published to determine the pooled estimates for the effect of exon skipping in treating DMD. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind RCTs comparing exon-skipping drugs with placebo in DMD was performed. Trials were identified by searching published and unpublished studies from electronically available databases and clinical trial registries through October 2017. The primary outcomes were changes in the 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance, North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) scores, and adverse events. Random-effects meta-analysis and assessment of risk of bias were performed. This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42016037504). RESULTS: Five studies involving 322 participants were included, investigating eteplirsen in one and drisapersen in four studies. There were no changes in 6MWT distance (mean difference [MD] − 9.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 21.94 to 3.62) or NSAA scores (MD 1.20, 95% CI − 2.35 to 4.75) after 24 weeks of treatment in the exon-skipping group compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis for a 6 mg/kg weekly injection of drisapersen showed significant changes in the 6MWT, favoring drisapersen after 24 weeks (MD − 20.24; 95% CI − 39.59 to − 0.89). However, drisapersen resulted in a significant increase in injection site reactions (risk ratio [RR] 3.67, 95% CI 1.96 to 6.89, p < 0.0001) and renal toxicity (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.94, p = 0.02). Risk of bias was high in two of the five studies, including the eteplirsen and one drisapersen study. CONCLUSIONS: Current available data do not show evidence that exon-skipping drugs are effective in DMD. Despite potential effectiveness when used at a specific dose, significant side effects were reported with drisapersen. The small number of RCTs with relatively small numbers of participants indicate the difficulty in conducting sufficiently powered studies of DMD. Prospectively planned meta-analysis and utilization of the real-world data may provide a more precise estimate of the effect of exon skipping in this disease. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-018-0834-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6003096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60030962018-07-06 Exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Shimizu-Motohashi, Yuko Murakami, Terumi Kimura, En Komaki, Hirofumi Watanabe, Norio Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Exon skipping has been considered a promising therapeutic approach for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Eteplirsen received conditional approval in the United States in 2016. To date, no systematic reviews or meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of exon skipping drugs have been published to determine the pooled estimates for the effect of exon skipping in treating DMD. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind RCTs comparing exon-skipping drugs with placebo in DMD was performed. Trials were identified by searching published and unpublished studies from electronically available databases and clinical trial registries through October 2017. The primary outcomes were changes in the 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance, North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) scores, and adverse events. Random-effects meta-analysis and assessment of risk of bias were performed. This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42016037504). RESULTS: Five studies involving 322 participants were included, investigating eteplirsen in one and drisapersen in four studies. There were no changes in 6MWT distance (mean difference [MD] − 9.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 21.94 to 3.62) or NSAA scores (MD 1.20, 95% CI − 2.35 to 4.75) after 24 weeks of treatment in the exon-skipping group compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis for a 6 mg/kg weekly injection of drisapersen showed significant changes in the 6MWT, favoring drisapersen after 24 weeks (MD − 20.24; 95% CI − 39.59 to − 0.89). However, drisapersen resulted in a significant increase in injection site reactions (risk ratio [RR] 3.67, 95% CI 1.96 to 6.89, p < 0.0001) and renal toxicity (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.94, p = 0.02). Risk of bias was high in two of the five studies, including the eteplirsen and one drisapersen study. CONCLUSIONS: Current available data do not show evidence that exon-skipping drugs are effective in DMD. Despite potential effectiveness when used at a specific dose, significant side effects were reported with drisapersen. The small number of RCTs with relatively small numbers of participants indicate the difficulty in conducting sufficiently powered studies of DMD. Prospectively planned meta-analysis and utilization of the real-world data may provide a more precise estimate of the effect of exon skipping in this disease. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-018-0834-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6003096/ /pubmed/29907124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0834-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Shimizu-Motohashi, Yuko
Murakami, Terumi
Kimura, En
Komaki, Hirofumi
Watanabe, Norio
Exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort exon skipping for duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6003096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29907124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0834-2
work_keys_str_mv AT shimizumotohashiyuko exonskippingforduchennemusculardystrophyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT murakamiterumi exonskippingforduchennemusculardystrophyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimuraen exonskippingforduchennemusculardystrophyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT komakihirofumi exonskippingforduchennemusculardystrophyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT watanabenorio exonskippingforduchennemusculardystrophyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis