Cargando…

The Men’s Safer Sex Trial: A feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the feasibility of an online randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the Men’s Safer Sex website, measuring condom use and sexually transmitted infection (STI). METHODS: For this study 159 men aged ≥16 with female sexual partners and recent condomless sex or suspected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bailey, Julia V, Webster, Rosie, Griffin, Mark, Freemantle, Nick, Hunter, Rachael, Rait, Greta, Estcourt, Claudia, Anderson, Jane, Gerressu, Makeda, Stephenson, Judith, Michie, Susan, Murray, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6003442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207616679002
_version_ 1783332365650624512
author Bailey, Julia V
Webster, Rosie
Griffin, Mark
Freemantle, Nick
Hunter, Rachael
Rait, Greta
Estcourt, Claudia
Anderson, Jane
Gerressu, Makeda
Stephenson, Judith
Michie, Susan
Murray, Elizabeth
author_facet Bailey, Julia V
Webster, Rosie
Griffin, Mark
Freemantle, Nick
Hunter, Rachael
Rait, Greta
Estcourt, Claudia
Anderson, Jane
Gerressu, Makeda
Stephenson, Judith
Michie, Susan
Murray, Elizabeth
author_sort Bailey, Julia V
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the feasibility of an online randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the Men’s Safer Sex website, measuring condom use and sexually transmitted infection (STI). METHODS: For this study 159 men aged ≥16 with female sexual partners and recent condomless sex or suspected STI were recruited from three UK sexual health clinics. Participants were randomised to the intervention website plus usual clinic care (n = 84), or usual clinic care only (n = 75). Online outcome data were solicited at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Men were enrolled via tablet computers in clinic waiting rooms. Software errors and clinic Wi-Fi access presented significant challenges, and online questionnaire response rates were poor (36% at 3 months with a £10 voucher; 50% at 12 months with £30). Clinical records (for STI diagnoses) were located for 94% of participants. Some 37% of the intervention group did not see the intervention website (n = 31/84), and (as expected) there was no detectable difference in condomless sex with female partners (IRR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.96). New acute STI diagnoses were recorded for 8.8% (7/80) of the intervention group, and 13.0% (9/69) of the control group over 12 months (IRR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.90). CONCLUSION: It is likely to be feasible to conduct a future large-scale RCT to assess the impact of an online intervention using clinic STI diagnoses as a primary outcome. However, practical and technical challenges need to be addressed before the potential of digital media interventions can be realised in sexual health settings. Trial registration number: ISRCTN18649610
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6003442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60034422018-06-25 The Men’s Safer Sex Trial: A feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men Bailey, Julia V Webster, Rosie Griffin, Mark Freemantle, Nick Hunter, Rachael Rait, Greta Estcourt, Claudia Anderson, Jane Gerressu, Makeda Stephenson, Judith Michie, Susan Murray, Elizabeth Digit Health Original Research OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the feasibility of an online randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the Men’s Safer Sex website, measuring condom use and sexually transmitted infection (STI). METHODS: For this study 159 men aged ≥16 with female sexual partners and recent condomless sex or suspected STI were recruited from three UK sexual health clinics. Participants were randomised to the intervention website plus usual clinic care (n = 84), or usual clinic care only (n = 75). Online outcome data were solicited at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Men were enrolled via tablet computers in clinic waiting rooms. Software errors and clinic Wi-Fi access presented significant challenges, and online questionnaire response rates were poor (36% at 3 months with a £10 voucher; 50% at 12 months with £30). Clinical records (for STI diagnoses) were located for 94% of participants. Some 37% of the intervention group did not see the intervention website (n = 31/84), and (as expected) there was no detectable difference in condomless sex with female partners (IRR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.96). New acute STI diagnoses were recorded for 8.8% (7/80) of the intervention group, and 13.0% (9/69) of the control group over 12 months (IRR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.90). CONCLUSION: It is likely to be feasible to conduct a future large-scale RCT to assess the impact of an online intervention using clinic STI diagnoses as a primary outcome. However, practical and technical challenges need to be addressed before the potential of digital media interventions can be realised in sexual health settings. Trial registration number: ISRCTN18649610 SAGE Publications 2016-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6003442/ /pubmed/29942575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207616679002 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Bailey, Julia V
Webster, Rosie
Griffin, Mark
Freemantle, Nick
Hunter, Rachael
Rait, Greta
Estcourt, Claudia
Anderson, Jane
Gerressu, Makeda
Stephenson, Judith
Michie, Susan
Murray, Elizabeth
The Men’s Safer Sex Trial: A feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men
title The Men’s Safer Sex Trial: A feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men
title_full The Men’s Safer Sex Trial: A feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men
title_fullStr The Men’s Safer Sex Trial: A feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men
title_full_unstemmed The Men’s Safer Sex Trial: A feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men
title_short The Men’s Safer Sex Trial: A feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men
title_sort men’s safer sex trial: a feasibility randomised controlled trial of an interactive digital intervention to increase condom use in men
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6003442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207616679002
work_keys_str_mv AT baileyjuliav themenssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT websterrosie themenssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT griffinmark themenssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT freemantlenick themenssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT hunterrachael themenssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT raitgreta themenssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT estcourtclaudia themenssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT andersonjane themenssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT gerressumakeda themenssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT stephensonjudith themenssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT michiesusan themenssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT murrayelizabeth themenssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT baileyjuliav menssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT websterrosie menssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT griffinmark menssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT freemantlenick menssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT hunterrachael menssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT raitgreta menssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT estcourtclaudia menssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT andersonjane menssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT gerressumakeda menssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT stephensonjudith menssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT michiesusan menssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen
AT murrayelizabeth menssafersextrialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaninteractivedigitalinterventiontoincreasecondomuseinmen