Cargando…
Foveal Crowding Resolved
Crowding is the substantial interference of neighboring items on target identification. Crowding with letter stimuli has been studied primarily in the visual periphery, with conflicting results for foveal stimuli. While a cortical locus for peripheral crowding is well established (with a large spati...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29907791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27480-4 |
_version_ | 1783332446533582848 |
---|---|
author | Coates, Daniel R. Levi, Dennis M. Touch, Phanith Sabesan, Ramkumar |
author_facet | Coates, Daniel R. Levi, Dennis M. Touch, Phanith Sabesan, Ramkumar |
author_sort | Coates, Daniel R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Crowding is the substantial interference of neighboring items on target identification. Crowding with letter stimuli has been studied primarily in the visual periphery, with conflicting results for foveal stimuli. While a cortical locus for peripheral crowding is well established (with a large spatial extent up to half of the target eccentricity), disentangling the contributing factors in the fovea is more challenging due to optical limitations. Here, we used adaptive optics (AO) to overcome ocular aberrations and employed high-resolution stimuli to precisely characterize foveal lateral interactions with high-contrast letters flanked by letters. Crowding was present, with a maximal edge-to-edge interference zone of 0.75-1.3 minutes at typical unflanked performance levels. In agreement with earlier foveal contour interaction studies, performance was non-monotonic, revealing a recovery effect with proximal flankers. Modeling revealed that the deleterious effects of flankers can be described by a single function across stimulus sizes when the degradation is expressed as a reduction in sensitivity (expressed in Z-score units). The recovery, however, did not follow this pattern, likely reflecting a separate mechanism. Additional analysis reconciles multiple results from the literature, including the observed scale invariance of center-to-center spacing, as well as the size independence of edge-to-edge spacing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6004009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60040092018-06-26 Foveal Crowding Resolved Coates, Daniel R. Levi, Dennis M. Touch, Phanith Sabesan, Ramkumar Sci Rep Article Crowding is the substantial interference of neighboring items on target identification. Crowding with letter stimuli has been studied primarily in the visual periphery, with conflicting results for foveal stimuli. While a cortical locus for peripheral crowding is well established (with a large spatial extent up to half of the target eccentricity), disentangling the contributing factors in the fovea is more challenging due to optical limitations. Here, we used adaptive optics (AO) to overcome ocular aberrations and employed high-resolution stimuli to precisely characterize foveal lateral interactions with high-contrast letters flanked by letters. Crowding was present, with a maximal edge-to-edge interference zone of 0.75-1.3 minutes at typical unflanked performance levels. In agreement with earlier foveal contour interaction studies, performance was non-monotonic, revealing a recovery effect with proximal flankers. Modeling revealed that the deleterious effects of flankers can be described by a single function across stimulus sizes when the degradation is expressed as a reduction in sensitivity (expressed in Z-score units). The recovery, however, did not follow this pattern, likely reflecting a separate mechanism. Additional analysis reconciles multiple results from the literature, including the observed scale invariance of center-to-center spacing, as well as the size independence of edge-to-edge spacing. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6004009/ /pubmed/29907791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27480-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Coates, Daniel R. Levi, Dennis M. Touch, Phanith Sabesan, Ramkumar Foveal Crowding Resolved |
title | Foveal Crowding Resolved |
title_full | Foveal Crowding Resolved |
title_fullStr | Foveal Crowding Resolved |
title_full_unstemmed | Foveal Crowding Resolved |
title_short | Foveal Crowding Resolved |
title_sort | foveal crowding resolved |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29907791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27480-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coatesdanielr fovealcrowdingresolved AT levidennism fovealcrowdingresolved AT touchphanith fovealcrowdingresolved AT sabesanramkumar fovealcrowdingresolved |