Cargando…

In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile

Background: Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is a major nosocomial pathogen that colonizes in the human gut. Recently, the U.S. FDA approved three new antimicrobial agents against gram-positive bacteria: Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole. The efficacy of these antibiotics for treatment of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Binyamin, Dana, Nitzan, Orna, Azrad, Maya, Hamo, Zohar, Koren, Omry, Peretz, Avi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01256
_version_ 1783332522132766720
author Binyamin, Dana
Nitzan, Orna
Azrad, Maya
Hamo, Zohar
Koren, Omry
Peretz, Avi
author_facet Binyamin, Dana
Nitzan, Orna
Azrad, Maya
Hamo, Zohar
Koren, Omry
Peretz, Avi
author_sort Binyamin, Dana
collection PubMed
description Background: Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is a major nosocomial pathogen that colonizes in the human gut. Recently, the U.S. FDA approved three new antimicrobial agents against gram-positive bacteria: Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole. The efficacy of these antibiotics for treatment of C. difficile infection has not been thoroughly examined. The current study aimed to examine the in vitro activity of these antibiotics against C. difficile. In addition, to compare between Dalbavancin and Ceftobiprole to antibiotics from the same class: Vancomycin and Ceftriaxone, respectively. Methods: Eighty-four C. difficile isolates were tested for susceptibility to Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, Ceftobiprole, Vancomycin, and Ceftriaxone by Etest technique in order to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Results: Upon comparison of the novel antibiotic agents, Dalbavancin demonstrated the lowest MIC values and ceftobiprole the highest at MIC(50) (0.016, 0.38, and 1.5 μg/mL, for Dalbavancin, Tedizolid, and Ceftobiprole, respectively) and MIC(90) (0.03, 0.78, and 3.17 μg/mL, respectively). Dalbavancin demonstrated significantly lower MIC(50) and MIC(90) values compared to Vancomycin (0.016 vs. 0.38 and 0.03 vs. 3.5, respectively) (p < 0.001) and ceftobiprole had significantly lower MIC values compare to ceftriaxone (1.5 vs. 32 and 3.17 vs. 28.8, respectively) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Dalbavancin and Tedizolid may play a role as potential therapeutic agents for treatment of C. difficile infection. Examination of antibiotic effect on the intestinal microbiome and clinical trials are needed for more accurate results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6004428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60044282018-06-25 In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile Binyamin, Dana Nitzan, Orna Azrad, Maya Hamo, Zohar Koren, Omry Peretz, Avi Front Microbiol Microbiology Background: Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is a major nosocomial pathogen that colonizes in the human gut. Recently, the U.S. FDA approved three new antimicrobial agents against gram-positive bacteria: Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole. The efficacy of these antibiotics for treatment of C. difficile infection has not been thoroughly examined. The current study aimed to examine the in vitro activity of these antibiotics against C. difficile. In addition, to compare between Dalbavancin and Ceftobiprole to antibiotics from the same class: Vancomycin and Ceftriaxone, respectively. Methods: Eighty-four C. difficile isolates were tested for susceptibility to Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, Ceftobiprole, Vancomycin, and Ceftriaxone by Etest technique in order to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Results: Upon comparison of the novel antibiotic agents, Dalbavancin demonstrated the lowest MIC values and ceftobiprole the highest at MIC(50) (0.016, 0.38, and 1.5 μg/mL, for Dalbavancin, Tedizolid, and Ceftobiprole, respectively) and MIC(90) (0.03, 0.78, and 3.17 μg/mL, respectively). Dalbavancin demonstrated significantly lower MIC(50) and MIC(90) values compared to Vancomycin (0.016 vs. 0.38 and 0.03 vs. 3.5, respectively) (p < 0.001) and ceftobiprole had significantly lower MIC values compare to ceftriaxone (1.5 vs. 32 and 3.17 vs. 28.8, respectively) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Dalbavancin and Tedizolid may play a role as potential therapeutic agents for treatment of C. difficile infection. Examination of antibiotic effect on the intestinal microbiome and clinical trials are needed for more accurate results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6004428/ /pubmed/29942295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01256 Text en Copyright © 2017 Binyamin, Nitzan, Azrad, Hamo, Koren and Peretz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Binyamin, Dana
Nitzan, Orna
Azrad, Maya
Hamo, Zohar
Koren, Omry
Peretz, Avi
In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile
title In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile
title_full In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile
title_fullStr In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile
title_short In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile
title_sort in vitro activity of tedizolid, dalbavancin, and ceftobiprole against clostridium difficile
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01256
work_keys_str_mv AT binyamindana invitroactivityoftedizoliddalbavancinandceftobiproleagainstclostridiumdifficile
AT nitzanorna invitroactivityoftedizoliddalbavancinandceftobiproleagainstclostridiumdifficile
AT azradmaya invitroactivityoftedizoliddalbavancinandceftobiproleagainstclostridiumdifficile
AT hamozohar invitroactivityoftedizoliddalbavancinandceftobiproleagainstclostridiumdifficile
AT korenomry invitroactivityoftedizoliddalbavancinandceftobiproleagainstclostridiumdifficile
AT peretzavi invitroactivityoftedizoliddalbavancinandceftobiproleagainstclostridiumdifficile