Cargando…
In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile
Background: Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is a major nosocomial pathogen that colonizes in the human gut. Recently, the U.S. FDA approved three new antimicrobial agents against gram-positive bacteria: Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole. The efficacy of these antibiotics for treatment of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01256 |
_version_ | 1783332522132766720 |
---|---|
author | Binyamin, Dana Nitzan, Orna Azrad, Maya Hamo, Zohar Koren, Omry Peretz, Avi |
author_facet | Binyamin, Dana Nitzan, Orna Azrad, Maya Hamo, Zohar Koren, Omry Peretz, Avi |
author_sort | Binyamin, Dana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is a major nosocomial pathogen that colonizes in the human gut. Recently, the U.S. FDA approved three new antimicrobial agents against gram-positive bacteria: Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole. The efficacy of these antibiotics for treatment of C. difficile infection has not been thoroughly examined. The current study aimed to examine the in vitro activity of these antibiotics against C. difficile. In addition, to compare between Dalbavancin and Ceftobiprole to antibiotics from the same class: Vancomycin and Ceftriaxone, respectively. Methods: Eighty-four C. difficile isolates were tested for susceptibility to Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, Ceftobiprole, Vancomycin, and Ceftriaxone by Etest technique in order to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Results: Upon comparison of the novel antibiotic agents, Dalbavancin demonstrated the lowest MIC values and ceftobiprole the highest at MIC(50) (0.016, 0.38, and 1.5 μg/mL, for Dalbavancin, Tedizolid, and Ceftobiprole, respectively) and MIC(90) (0.03, 0.78, and 3.17 μg/mL, respectively). Dalbavancin demonstrated significantly lower MIC(50) and MIC(90) values compared to Vancomycin (0.016 vs. 0.38 and 0.03 vs. 3.5, respectively) (p < 0.001) and ceftobiprole had significantly lower MIC values compare to ceftriaxone (1.5 vs. 32 and 3.17 vs. 28.8, respectively) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Dalbavancin and Tedizolid may play a role as potential therapeutic agents for treatment of C. difficile infection. Examination of antibiotic effect on the intestinal microbiome and clinical trials are needed for more accurate results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6004428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60044282018-06-25 In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile Binyamin, Dana Nitzan, Orna Azrad, Maya Hamo, Zohar Koren, Omry Peretz, Avi Front Microbiol Microbiology Background: Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is a major nosocomial pathogen that colonizes in the human gut. Recently, the U.S. FDA approved three new antimicrobial agents against gram-positive bacteria: Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole. The efficacy of these antibiotics for treatment of C. difficile infection has not been thoroughly examined. The current study aimed to examine the in vitro activity of these antibiotics against C. difficile. In addition, to compare between Dalbavancin and Ceftobiprole to antibiotics from the same class: Vancomycin and Ceftriaxone, respectively. Methods: Eighty-four C. difficile isolates were tested for susceptibility to Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, Ceftobiprole, Vancomycin, and Ceftriaxone by Etest technique in order to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Results: Upon comparison of the novel antibiotic agents, Dalbavancin demonstrated the lowest MIC values and ceftobiprole the highest at MIC(50) (0.016, 0.38, and 1.5 μg/mL, for Dalbavancin, Tedizolid, and Ceftobiprole, respectively) and MIC(90) (0.03, 0.78, and 3.17 μg/mL, respectively). Dalbavancin demonstrated significantly lower MIC(50) and MIC(90) values compared to Vancomycin (0.016 vs. 0.38 and 0.03 vs. 3.5, respectively) (p < 0.001) and ceftobiprole had significantly lower MIC values compare to ceftriaxone (1.5 vs. 32 and 3.17 vs. 28.8, respectively) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Dalbavancin and Tedizolid may play a role as potential therapeutic agents for treatment of C. difficile infection. Examination of antibiotic effect on the intestinal microbiome and clinical trials are needed for more accurate results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6004428/ /pubmed/29942295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01256 Text en Copyright © 2017 Binyamin, Nitzan, Azrad, Hamo, Koren and Peretz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Binyamin, Dana Nitzan, Orna Azrad, Maya Hamo, Zohar Koren, Omry Peretz, Avi In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile |
title | In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile |
title_full | In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile |
title_fullStr | In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile |
title_short | In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile |
title_sort | in vitro activity of tedizolid, dalbavancin, and ceftobiprole against clostridium difficile |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01256 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT binyamindana invitroactivityoftedizoliddalbavancinandceftobiproleagainstclostridiumdifficile AT nitzanorna invitroactivityoftedizoliddalbavancinandceftobiproleagainstclostridiumdifficile AT azradmaya invitroactivityoftedizoliddalbavancinandceftobiproleagainstclostridiumdifficile AT hamozohar invitroactivityoftedizoliddalbavancinandceftobiproleagainstclostridiumdifficile AT korenomry invitroactivityoftedizoliddalbavancinandceftobiproleagainstclostridiumdifficile AT peretzavi invitroactivityoftedizoliddalbavancinandceftobiproleagainstclostridiumdifficile |