Cargando…

Epidemiology of spider mite sensitivity: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND: Spider mites, including Tetranychus urticae, Panonychus citri, and Panonychus ulmi, are common pests in gardens, greenhouses, and orchards. Exposure, particularly occupational exposure, to these organisms may lead to the development of respiratory or contact allergies. However, the preva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Ying, Jia, Haoyuan, Zhou, Xuming, Cui, Yubao, Qian, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29946417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-018-0209-8
_version_ 1783332560373284864
author Zhou, Ying
Jia, Haoyuan
Zhou, Xuming
Cui, Yubao
Qian, Jun
author_facet Zhou, Ying
Jia, Haoyuan
Zhou, Xuming
Cui, Yubao
Qian, Jun
author_sort Zhou, Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spider mites, including Tetranychus urticae, Panonychus citri, and Panonychus ulmi, are common pests in gardens, greenhouses, and orchards. Exposure, particularly occupational exposure, to these organisms may lead to the development of respiratory or contact allergies. However, the prevalence of sensitivity to spider mites is unclear. METHODS: We examined the literature to generate an estimate of the global prevalence of allergies to spider mites. RESULTS: Electronic databases were searched and twenty-three studies reporting the prevalence of sensitivity to spider mites (based on skin prick tests or IgE-based detection systems) in an aggregate total of 40,908 subjects were selected for analysis. The estimated overall rate of spider mite sensitivity was 22.9% (95% CI 19–26.8%). Heterogeneity was high and meta-regression analysis considering variables such as published year, country, number of study subjects, methods for allergen detection (skin prick test, ImmunoCAP, RAST testing, or intradermal test), and mite species revealed no single significant source. Twelve of the 23 studies reported rates of monosensitization (i.e., patients responsive to spider mites but no other tested allergen), yielding a global average of 7% (95% CI 5–9%), hence spider mites represent a unique source of allergens. CONCLUSIONS: Spider mites are an important cause of allergic symptoms. However, the publication bias and heterogeneity evident in this study indicate that further trials using standardized detection methods are needed to determine the association of exposure and symptoms as well as the specific patient characteristics that influence developing spider mite sensitivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6004667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60046672018-06-26 Epidemiology of spider mite sensitivity: a meta-analysis and systematic review Zhou, Ying Jia, Haoyuan Zhou, Xuming Cui, Yubao Qian, Jun Clin Transl Allergy Review BACKGROUND: Spider mites, including Tetranychus urticae, Panonychus citri, and Panonychus ulmi, are common pests in gardens, greenhouses, and orchards. Exposure, particularly occupational exposure, to these organisms may lead to the development of respiratory or contact allergies. However, the prevalence of sensitivity to spider mites is unclear. METHODS: We examined the literature to generate an estimate of the global prevalence of allergies to spider mites. RESULTS: Electronic databases were searched and twenty-three studies reporting the prevalence of sensitivity to spider mites (based on skin prick tests or IgE-based detection systems) in an aggregate total of 40,908 subjects were selected for analysis. The estimated overall rate of spider mite sensitivity was 22.9% (95% CI 19–26.8%). Heterogeneity was high and meta-regression analysis considering variables such as published year, country, number of study subjects, methods for allergen detection (skin prick test, ImmunoCAP, RAST testing, or intradermal test), and mite species revealed no single significant source. Twelve of the 23 studies reported rates of monosensitization (i.e., patients responsive to spider mites but no other tested allergen), yielding a global average of 7% (95% CI 5–9%), hence spider mites represent a unique source of allergens. CONCLUSIONS: Spider mites are an important cause of allergic symptoms. However, the publication bias and heterogeneity evident in this study indicate that further trials using standardized detection methods are needed to determine the association of exposure and symptoms as well as the specific patient characteristics that influence developing spider mite sensitivity. BioMed Central 2018-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6004667/ /pubmed/29946417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-018-0209-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Zhou, Ying
Jia, Haoyuan
Zhou, Xuming
Cui, Yubao
Qian, Jun
Epidemiology of spider mite sensitivity: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title Epidemiology of spider mite sensitivity: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full Epidemiology of spider mite sensitivity: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_fullStr Epidemiology of spider mite sensitivity: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiology of spider mite sensitivity: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_short Epidemiology of spider mite sensitivity: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_sort epidemiology of spider mite sensitivity: a meta-analysis and systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29946417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-018-0209-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouying epidemiologyofspidermitesensitivityametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT jiahaoyuan epidemiologyofspidermitesensitivityametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT zhouxuming epidemiologyofspidermitesensitivityametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT cuiyubao epidemiologyofspidermitesensitivityametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT qianjun epidemiologyofspidermitesensitivityametaanalysisandsystematicreview