Cargando…
Shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of new and rebounded orthodontic brackets bonded to the buccal sound and cleaned enamel surfaces using two orthodontic adhesives: resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) and resin-composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963507 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_158_17 |
_version_ | 1783332582531792896 |
---|---|
author | Salama, Fouad Alrejaye, Hessa Aldosari, Malak Almosa, Naif |
author_facet | Salama, Fouad Alrejaye, Hessa Aldosari, Malak Almosa, Naif |
author_sort | Salama, Fouad |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of new and rebounded orthodontic brackets bonded to the buccal sound and cleaned enamel surfaces using two orthodontic adhesives: resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) and resin-composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty premolars were randomly allocated into four groups, 10 teeth/group. New and rebonded brackets were bonded to sound and cleaned enamel surface, and then were subjected to thermocycling. The bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Remaining adhesives on enamel after bracket debonding was scored independently by two investigators who were not aware of the four different groups, using adhesive remnant index (ARI). RESULTS: There was a statistical significant difference in SBS of the four groups (P = 0.005). SBS values were significantly higher with cleaned enamel surfaces after adhesive removal compared to sound enamel. SBS was significantly higher for rebonded brackets, when compared with the new brackets. No significant difference was found between the two adhesives types. The level of agreement between the two raters was higher toward the classification of higher categories of ARI (scores 5 and 6) with agreement percentage 91.7% and 100%, respectively. There was more adhesive remained among resin-composite groups. CONCLUSIONS: The bond strength of debonded sandblasted stainless-steel brackets was higher than new brackets. Resin-composite and RMGI orthodontic adhesives used in this study exhibited sufficient SBS values for bonding brackets to sound and cleaned enamel and comparable to each other. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6004780 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60047802018-06-29 Shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces Salama, Fouad Alrejaye, Hessa Aldosari, Malak Almosa, Naif J Orthod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of new and rebounded orthodontic brackets bonded to the buccal sound and cleaned enamel surfaces using two orthodontic adhesives: resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) and resin-composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty premolars were randomly allocated into four groups, 10 teeth/group. New and rebonded brackets were bonded to sound and cleaned enamel surface, and then were subjected to thermocycling. The bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Remaining adhesives on enamel after bracket debonding was scored independently by two investigators who were not aware of the four different groups, using adhesive remnant index (ARI). RESULTS: There was a statistical significant difference in SBS of the four groups (P = 0.005). SBS values were significantly higher with cleaned enamel surfaces after adhesive removal compared to sound enamel. SBS was significantly higher for rebonded brackets, when compared with the new brackets. No significant difference was found between the two adhesives types. The level of agreement between the two raters was higher toward the classification of higher categories of ARI (scores 5 and 6) with agreement percentage 91.7% and 100%, respectively. There was more adhesive remained among resin-composite groups. CONCLUSIONS: The bond strength of debonded sandblasted stainless-steel brackets was higher than new brackets. Resin-composite and RMGI orthodontic adhesives used in this study exhibited sufficient SBS values for bonding brackets to sound and cleaned enamel and comparable to each other. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6004780/ /pubmed/29963507 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_158_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Orthodontic Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Salama, Fouad Alrejaye, Hessa Aldosari, Malak Almosa, Naif Shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces |
title | Shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces |
title_full | Shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces |
title_fullStr | Shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | Shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces |
title_short | Shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces |
title_sort | shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963507 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_158_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salamafouad shearbondstrengthofnewandrebondedorthodonticbracketstotheenamelsurfaces AT alrejayehessa shearbondstrengthofnewandrebondedorthodonticbracketstotheenamelsurfaces AT aldosarimalak shearbondstrengthofnewandrebondedorthodonticbracketstotheenamelsurfaces AT almosanaif shearbondstrengthofnewandrebondedorthodonticbracketstotheenamelsurfaces |