Cargando…

A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems

OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to compare microleakage in self-etching fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This experimental in vitro study was conducted on 60 healthy third molars extracted from humans. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nahvi, Azam, Razavian, Alireza, Abedi, Hoorieh, Charati, Jamshid Yazdani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988227
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_63_18
_version_ 1783332587115118592
author Nahvi, Azam
Razavian, Alireza
Abedi, Hoorieh
Charati, Jamshid Yazdani
author_facet Nahvi, Azam
Razavian, Alireza
Abedi, Hoorieh
Charati, Jamshid Yazdani
author_sort Nahvi, Azam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to compare microleakage in self-etching fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This experimental in vitro study was conducted on 60 healthy third molars extracted from humans. The first group received Acid etch + Clinpro sealant, the second group received Acid etch + Single bond 2 + Clinpro sealant, the third group received Single bond universal (self-etching bonding) + Clinpro sealant, and the fourth group received prevent seal self-etching sealant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An incision was made on the teeth after they were immersed in methylene blue 5%. The samples were then examined under a stereomicroscope and the dye penetration rate was measured based on the Williams and Winter criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used for data analysis in SPSS-18 (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Group 1 which was treated with the conventional technique (acid + fissure sealant) had the highest rate of microleakage compared to Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results showed that the use of bonding results in a significant reduction in the microleakage of fissure sealants. The microleakage caused when using self-etch fissure sealant was not different from that caused by the use of the conventional method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6004805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60048052018-07-09 A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems Nahvi, Azam Razavian, Alireza Abedi, Hoorieh Charati, Jamshid Yazdani Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to compare microleakage in self-etching fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This experimental in vitro study was conducted on 60 healthy third molars extracted from humans. The first group received Acid etch + Clinpro sealant, the second group received Acid etch + Single bond 2 + Clinpro sealant, the third group received Single bond universal (self-etching bonding) + Clinpro sealant, and the fourth group received prevent seal self-etching sealant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An incision was made on the teeth after they were immersed in methylene blue 5%. The samples were then examined under a stereomicroscope and the dye penetration rate was measured based on the Williams and Winter criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used for data analysis in SPSS-18 (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Group 1 which was treated with the conventional technique (acid + fissure sealant) had the highest rate of microleakage compared to Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results showed that the use of bonding results in a significant reduction in the microleakage of fissure sealants. The microleakage caused when using self-etch fissure sealant was not different from that caused by the use of the conventional method. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6004805/ /pubmed/29988227 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_63_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nahvi, Azam
Razavian, Alireza
Abedi, Hoorieh
Charati, Jamshid Yazdani
A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems
title A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems
title_full A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems
title_fullStr A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems
title_short A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems
title_sort comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988227
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_63_18
work_keys_str_mv AT nahviazam acomparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems
AT razavianalireza acomparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems
AT abedihoorieh acomparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems
AT charatijamshidyazdani acomparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems
AT nahviazam comparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems
AT razavianalireza comparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems
AT abedihoorieh comparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems
AT charatijamshidyazdani comparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems