Cargando…
A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems
OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to compare microleakage in self-etching fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This experimental in vitro study was conducted on 60 healthy third molars extracted from humans. T...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988227 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_63_18 |
_version_ | 1783332587115118592 |
---|---|
author | Nahvi, Azam Razavian, Alireza Abedi, Hoorieh Charati, Jamshid Yazdani |
author_facet | Nahvi, Azam Razavian, Alireza Abedi, Hoorieh Charati, Jamshid Yazdani |
author_sort | Nahvi, Azam |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to compare microleakage in self-etching fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This experimental in vitro study was conducted on 60 healthy third molars extracted from humans. The first group received Acid etch + Clinpro sealant, the second group received Acid etch + Single bond 2 + Clinpro sealant, the third group received Single bond universal (self-etching bonding) + Clinpro sealant, and the fourth group received prevent seal self-etching sealant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An incision was made on the teeth after they were immersed in methylene blue 5%. The samples were then examined under a stereomicroscope and the dye penetration rate was measured based on the Williams and Winter criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used for data analysis in SPSS-18 (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Group 1 which was treated with the conventional technique (acid + fissure sealant) had the highest rate of microleakage compared to Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results showed that the use of bonding results in a significant reduction in the microleakage of fissure sealants. The microleakage caused when using self-etch fissure sealant was not different from that caused by the use of the conventional method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6004805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60048052018-07-09 A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems Nahvi, Azam Razavian, Alireza Abedi, Hoorieh Charati, Jamshid Yazdani Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to compare microleakage in self-etching fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This experimental in vitro study was conducted on 60 healthy third molars extracted from humans. The first group received Acid etch + Clinpro sealant, the second group received Acid etch + Single bond 2 + Clinpro sealant, the third group received Single bond universal (self-etching bonding) + Clinpro sealant, and the fourth group received prevent seal self-etching sealant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An incision was made on the teeth after they were immersed in methylene blue 5%. The samples were then examined under a stereomicroscope and the dye penetration rate was measured based on the Williams and Winter criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used for data analysis in SPSS-18 (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Group 1 which was treated with the conventional technique (acid + fissure sealant) had the highest rate of microleakage compared to Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results showed that the use of bonding results in a significant reduction in the microleakage of fissure sealants. The microleakage caused when using self-etch fissure sealant was not different from that caused by the use of the conventional method. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6004805/ /pubmed/29988227 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_63_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nahvi, Azam Razavian, Alireza Abedi, Hoorieh Charati, Jamshid Yazdani A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems |
title | A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems |
title_full | A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems |
title_fullStr | A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems |
title_short | A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems |
title_sort | comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988227 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_63_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nahviazam acomparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems AT razavianalireza acomparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems AT abedihoorieh acomparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems AT charatijamshidyazdani acomparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems AT nahviazam comparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems AT razavianalireza comparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems AT abedihoorieh comparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems AT charatijamshidyazdani comparisonofmicroleakageinselfetchfissuresealantsandconventionalfissuresealantswithtotaletchorselfetchadhesivesystems |