Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study
OBJECTIVE: The apical constriction (AC) and the apical foramen (AF) are the principal reference points used to determine the apical limit for instrumentation and root canal filling. AC varies in different races, and the aim of the current study was to measure and compare the distances from AC to AF...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988250 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_54_18 |
_version_ | 1783332590414987264 |
---|---|
author | Mousavi, Seyed Amir Farhad, Alireza Shahnaseri, Shirin Basiri, Abbas Kolahdouzan, Erfan |
author_facet | Mousavi, Seyed Amir Farhad, Alireza Shahnaseri, Shirin Basiri, Abbas Kolahdouzan, Erfan |
author_sort | Mousavi, Seyed Amir |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The apical constriction (AC) and the apical foramen (AF) are the principal reference points used to determine the apical limit for instrumentation and root canal filling. AC varies in different races, and the aim of the current study was to measure and compare the distances from AC to AF and the anatomical apex (AA) in incisor and molar teeth in the Iranian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five roots of incisor teeth and 45 roots of molar teeth were selected randomly in Isfahan Province, Iran. If the foramen was located toward the mesial or distal side of the apex, the cut was made mesiodistally, and if it was toward the buccal or lingual side, the section was made accordingly. Roots were examined under a microscope at ×25 magnification. The distances from AC to AF and AA were then estimated using a Motic camera. Descriptive statistics were used. The independent t-test was also used to compare distances in incisors and molars, and P = 0.05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: The mean distances between AC and AF were 0.847 ± 0.33 mm in incisors and 0.709 ± 0.27 mm in molars. The mean distances between AC and AA were 1.23 ± 0.39 mm in incisors and 1.01 ± 0.38 mm in molars. In an independent t-test, the distances between AC and AF differed significantly in incisors and molars (P = 0.035), but the distances between AC and AA did not (P = 0.172). CONCLUSION: The end points for root canal therapy should be 0.85 mm in incisors and 0.70 mm in molars. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6004819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60048192018-07-09 Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study Mousavi, Seyed Amir Farhad, Alireza Shahnaseri, Shirin Basiri, Abbas Kolahdouzan, Erfan Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The apical constriction (AC) and the apical foramen (AF) are the principal reference points used to determine the apical limit for instrumentation and root canal filling. AC varies in different races, and the aim of the current study was to measure and compare the distances from AC to AF and the anatomical apex (AA) in incisor and molar teeth in the Iranian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five roots of incisor teeth and 45 roots of molar teeth were selected randomly in Isfahan Province, Iran. If the foramen was located toward the mesial or distal side of the apex, the cut was made mesiodistally, and if it was toward the buccal or lingual side, the section was made accordingly. Roots were examined under a microscope at ×25 magnification. The distances from AC to AF and AA were then estimated using a Motic camera. Descriptive statistics were used. The independent t-test was also used to compare distances in incisors and molars, and P = 0.05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: The mean distances between AC and AF were 0.847 ± 0.33 mm in incisors and 0.709 ± 0.27 mm in molars. The mean distances between AC and AA were 1.23 ± 0.39 mm in incisors and 1.01 ± 0.38 mm in molars. In an independent t-test, the distances between AC and AF differed significantly in incisors and molars (P = 0.035), but the distances between AC and AA did not (P = 0.172). CONCLUSION: The end points for root canal therapy should be 0.85 mm in incisors and 0.70 mm in molars. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6004819/ /pubmed/29988250 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_54_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mousavi, Seyed Amir Farhad, Alireza Shahnaseri, Shirin Basiri, Abbas Kolahdouzan, Erfan Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study |
title | Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988250 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_54_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mousaviseyedamir comparativeevaluationofapicalconstrictionpositioninincisorandmolarteethaninvitrostudy AT farhadalireza comparativeevaluationofapicalconstrictionpositioninincisorandmolarteethaninvitrostudy AT shahnaserishirin comparativeevaluationofapicalconstrictionpositioninincisorandmolarteethaninvitrostudy AT basiriabbas comparativeevaluationofapicalconstrictionpositioninincisorandmolarteethaninvitrostudy AT kolahdouzanerfan comparativeevaluationofapicalconstrictionpositioninincisorandmolarteethaninvitrostudy |