Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVE: The apical constriction (AC) and the apical foramen (AF) are the principal reference points used to determine the apical limit for instrumentation and root canal filling. AC varies in different races, and the aim of the current study was to measure and compare the distances from AC to AF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mousavi, Seyed Amir, Farhad, Alireza, Shahnaseri, Shirin, Basiri, Abbas, Kolahdouzan, Erfan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988250
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_54_18
_version_ 1783332590414987264
author Mousavi, Seyed Amir
Farhad, Alireza
Shahnaseri, Shirin
Basiri, Abbas
Kolahdouzan, Erfan
author_facet Mousavi, Seyed Amir
Farhad, Alireza
Shahnaseri, Shirin
Basiri, Abbas
Kolahdouzan, Erfan
author_sort Mousavi, Seyed Amir
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The apical constriction (AC) and the apical foramen (AF) are the principal reference points used to determine the apical limit for instrumentation and root canal filling. AC varies in different races, and the aim of the current study was to measure and compare the distances from AC to AF and the anatomical apex (AA) in incisor and molar teeth in the Iranian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five roots of incisor teeth and 45 roots of molar teeth were selected randomly in Isfahan Province, Iran. If the foramen was located toward the mesial or distal side of the apex, the cut was made mesiodistally, and if it was toward the buccal or lingual side, the section was made accordingly. Roots were examined under a microscope at ×25 magnification. The distances from AC to AF and AA were then estimated using a Motic camera. Descriptive statistics were used. The independent t-test was also used to compare distances in incisors and molars, and P = 0.05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: The mean distances between AC and AF were 0.847 ± 0.33 mm in incisors and 0.709 ± 0.27 mm in molars. The mean distances between AC and AA were 1.23 ± 0.39 mm in incisors and 1.01 ± 0.38 mm in molars. In an independent t-test, the distances between AC and AF differed significantly in incisors and molars (P = 0.035), but the distances between AC and AA did not (P = 0.172). CONCLUSION: The end points for root canal therapy should be 0.85 mm in incisors and 0.70 mm in molars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6004819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60048192018-07-09 Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study Mousavi, Seyed Amir Farhad, Alireza Shahnaseri, Shirin Basiri, Abbas Kolahdouzan, Erfan Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The apical constriction (AC) and the apical foramen (AF) are the principal reference points used to determine the apical limit for instrumentation and root canal filling. AC varies in different races, and the aim of the current study was to measure and compare the distances from AC to AF and the anatomical apex (AA) in incisor and molar teeth in the Iranian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five roots of incisor teeth and 45 roots of molar teeth were selected randomly in Isfahan Province, Iran. If the foramen was located toward the mesial or distal side of the apex, the cut was made mesiodistally, and if it was toward the buccal or lingual side, the section was made accordingly. Roots were examined under a microscope at ×25 magnification. The distances from AC to AF and AA were then estimated using a Motic camera. Descriptive statistics were used. The independent t-test was also used to compare distances in incisors and molars, and P = 0.05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: The mean distances between AC and AF were 0.847 ± 0.33 mm in incisors and 0.709 ± 0.27 mm in molars. The mean distances between AC and AA were 1.23 ± 0.39 mm in incisors and 1.01 ± 0.38 mm in molars. In an independent t-test, the distances between AC and AF differed significantly in incisors and molars (P = 0.035), but the distances between AC and AA did not (P = 0.172). CONCLUSION: The end points for root canal therapy should be 0.85 mm in incisors and 0.70 mm in molars. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6004819/ /pubmed/29988250 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_54_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mousavi, Seyed Amir
Farhad, Alireza
Shahnaseri, Shirin
Basiri, Abbas
Kolahdouzan, Erfan
Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988250
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_54_18
work_keys_str_mv AT mousaviseyedamir comparativeevaluationofapicalconstrictionpositioninincisorandmolarteethaninvitrostudy
AT farhadalireza comparativeevaluationofapicalconstrictionpositioninincisorandmolarteethaninvitrostudy
AT shahnaserishirin comparativeevaluationofapicalconstrictionpositioninincisorandmolarteethaninvitrostudy
AT basiriabbas comparativeevaluationofapicalconstrictionpositioninincisorandmolarteethaninvitrostudy
AT kolahdouzanerfan comparativeevaluationofapicalconstrictionpositioninincisorandmolarteethaninvitrostudy