Cargando…

The Amyloid-β Oligomer Hypothesis: Beginning of the Third Decade

The amyloid-β oligomer (AβO) hypothesis was introduced in 1998. It proposed that the brain damage leading to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) was instigated by soluble, ligand-like AβOs. This hypothesis was based on the discovery that fibril-free synthetic preparations of AβOs were potent CNS neurotoxins th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cline, Erika N., Bicca, Maíra Assunção, Viola, Kirsten L., Klein, William L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-179941
_version_ 1783332613239341056
author Cline, Erika N.
Bicca, Maíra Assunção
Viola, Kirsten L.
Klein, William L.
author_facet Cline, Erika N.
Bicca, Maíra Assunção
Viola, Kirsten L.
Klein, William L.
author_sort Cline, Erika N.
collection PubMed
description The amyloid-β oligomer (AβO) hypothesis was introduced in 1998. It proposed that the brain damage leading to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) was instigated by soluble, ligand-like AβOs. This hypothesis was based on the discovery that fibril-free synthetic preparations of AβOs were potent CNS neurotoxins that rapidly inhibited long-term potentiation and, with time, caused selective nerve cell death (Lambert et al., 1998). The mechanism was attributed to disrupted signaling involving the tyrosine-protein kinase Fyn, mediated by an unknown toxin receptor. Over 4,000 articles concerning AβOs have been published since then, including more than 400 reviews. AβOs have been shown to accumulate in an AD-dependent manner in human and animal model brain tissue and, experimentally, to impair learning and memory and instigate major facets of AD neuropathology, including tau pathology, synapse deterioration and loss, inflammation, and oxidative damage. As reviewed by Hayden and Teplow in 2013, the AβO hypothesis “has all but supplanted the amyloid cascade.” Despite the emerging understanding of the role played by AβOs in AD pathogenesis, AβOs have not yet received the clinical attention given to amyloid plaques, which have been at the core of major attempts at therapeutics and diagnostics but are no longer regarded as the most pathogenic form of Aβ. However, if the momentum of AβO research continues, particularly efforts to elucidate key aspects of structure, a clear path to a successful disease modifying therapy can be envisioned. Ensuring that lessons learned from recent, late-stage clinical failures are applied appropriately throughout therapeutic development will further enable the likelihood of a successful therapy in the near-term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6004937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60049372018-06-25 The Amyloid-β Oligomer Hypothesis: Beginning of the Third Decade Cline, Erika N. Bicca, Maíra Assunção Viola, Kirsten L. Klein, William L. J Alzheimers Dis Review The amyloid-β oligomer (AβO) hypothesis was introduced in 1998. It proposed that the brain damage leading to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) was instigated by soluble, ligand-like AβOs. This hypothesis was based on the discovery that fibril-free synthetic preparations of AβOs were potent CNS neurotoxins that rapidly inhibited long-term potentiation and, with time, caused selective nerve cell death (Lambert et al., 1998). The mechanism was attributed to disrupted signaling involving the tyrosine-protein kinase Fyn, mediated by an unknown toxin receptor. Over 4,000 articles concerning AβOs have been published since then, including more than 400 reviews. AβOs have been shown to accumulate in an AD-dependent manner in human and animal model brain tissue and, experimentally, to impair learning and memory and instigate major facets of AD neuropathology, including tau pathology, synapse deterioration and loss, inflammation, and oxidative damage. As reviewed by Hayden and Teplow in 2013, the AβO hypothesis “has all but supplanted the amyloid cascade.” Despite the emerging understanding of the role played by AβOs in AD pathogenesis, AβOs have not yet received the clinical attention given to amyloid plaques, which have been at the core of major attempts at therapeutics and diagnostics but are no longer regarded as the most pathogenic form of Aβ. However, if the momentum of AβO research continues, particularly efforts to elucidate key aspects of structure, a clear path to a successful disease modifying therapy can be envisioned. Ensuring that lessons learned from recent, late-stage clinical failures are applied appropriately throughout therapeutic development will further enable the likelihood of a successful therapy in the near-term. IOS Press 2018-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6004937/ /pubmed/29843241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-179941 Text en © 2018 –IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Cline, Erika N.
Bicca, Maíra Assunção
Viola, Kirsten L.
Klein, William L.
The Amyloid-β Oligomer Hypothesis: Beginning of the Third Decade
title The Amyloid-β Oligomer Hypothesis: Beginning of the Third Decade
title_full The Amyloid-β Oligomer Hypothesis: Beginning of the Third Decade
title_fullStr The Amyloid-β Oligomer Hypothesis: Beginning of the Third Decade
title_full_unstemmed The Amyloid-β Oligomer Hypothesis: Beginning of the Third Decade
title_short The Amyloid-β Oligomer Hypothesis: Beginning of the Third Decade
title_sort amyloid-β oligomer hypothesis: beginning of the third decade
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-179941
work_keys_str_mv AT clineerikan theamyloidboligomerhypothesisbeginningofthethirddecade
AT biccamairaassuncao theamyloidboligomerhypothesisbeginningofthethirddecade
AT violakirstenl theamyloidboligomerhypothesisbeginningofthethirddecade
AT kleinwilliaml theamyloidboligomerhypothesisbeginningofthethirddecade
AT clineerikan amyloidboligomerhypothesisbeginningofthethirddecade
AT biccamairaassuncao amyloidboligomerhypothesisbeginningofthethirddecade
AT violakirstenl amyloidboligomerhypothesisbeginningofthethirddecade
AT kleinwilliaml amyloidboligomerhypothesisbeginningofthethirddecade