Cargando…
Linezolid pharmacokinetics in MDR-TB: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Monte Carlo simulation
OBJECTIVES: The oxazolidinone linezolid is an effective component of drug-resistant TB treatment, but its use is limited by toxicity and the optimum dose is uncertain. Current strategies are not informed by clinical pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) data; we aimed to address this gap. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29584861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky096 |
_version_ | 1783332631545380864 |
---|---|
author | Millard, James Pertinez, Henry Bonnett, Laura Hodel, Eva Maria Dartois, Véronique Johnson, John L Caws, Maxine Tiberi, Simon Bolhuis, Mathieu Alffenaar, Jan-Willem C Davies, Geraint Sloan, Derek J |
author_facet | Millard, James Pertinez, Henry Bonnett, Laura Hodel, Eva Maria Dartois, Véronique Johnson, John L Caws, Maxine Tiberi, Simon Bolhuis, Mathieu Alffenaar, Jan-Willem C Davies, Geraint Sloan, Derek J |
author_sort | Millard, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The oxazolidinone linezolid is an effective component of drug-resistant TB treatment, but its use is limited by toxicity and the optimum dose is uncertain. Current strategies are not informed by clinical pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) data; we aimed to address this gap. METHODS: We defined linezolid PK/PD targets for efficacy (fAUC(0–24):MIC >119 mg/L/h) and safety (fC(min) <1.38 mg/L). We extracted individual-level linezolid PK data from existing studies on TB patients and performed meta-analysis, producing summary estimates of fAUC(0–24) and fC(min) for published doses. Combining these with a published MIC distribution, we performed Monte Carlo simulations of target attainment. RESULTS: The efficacy target was attained in all simulated individuals at 300 mg q12h and 600 mg q12h, but only 20.7% missed the safety target at 300 mg q12h versus 98.5% at 600 mg q12h. Although suggesting 300 mg q12h should be used preferentially, these data were reliant on a single centre. Efficacy and safety targets were missed by 41.0% and 24.2%, respectively, at 300 mg q24h and by 44.6% and 27.5%, respectively, at 600 mg q24h. However, the confounding effect of between-study heterogeneity on target attainment for q24h regimens was considerable. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid dosing at 300 mg q12h may retain the efficacy of the 600 mg q12h licensed dosing with improved safety. Data to evaluate commonly used 300 mg q24h and 600 mg q24h doses are limited. Comprehensive, prospectively obtained PK/PD data for linezolid doses in drug-resistant TB treatment are required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6005026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60050262018-06-21 Linezolid pharmacokinetics in MDR-TB: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Monte Carlo simulation Millard, James Pertinez, Henry Bonnett, Laura Hodel, Eva Maria Dartois, Véronique Johnson, John L Caws, Maxine Tiberi, Simon Bolhuis, Mathieu Alffenaar, Jan-Willem C Davies, Geraint Sloan, Derek J J Antimicrob Chemother Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: The oxazolidinone linezolid is an effective component of drug-resistant TB treatment, but its use is limited by toxicity and the optimum dose is uncertain. Current strategies are not informed by clinical pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) data; we aimed to address this gap. METHODS: We defined linezolid PK/PD targets for efficacy (fAUC(0–24):MIC >119 mg/L/h) and safety (fC(min) <1.38 mg/L). We extracted individual-level linezolid PK data from existing studies on TB patients and performed meta-analysis, producing summary estimates of fAUC(0–24) and fC(min) for published doses. Combining these with a published MIC distribution, we performed Monte Carlo simulations of target attainment. RESULTS: The efficacy target was attained in all simulated individuals at 300 mg q12h and 600 mg q12h, but only 20.7% missed the safety target at 300 mg q12h versus 98.5% at 600 mg q12h. Although suggesting 300 mg q12h should be used preferentially, these data were reliant on a single centre. Efficacy and safety targets were missed by 41.0% and 24.2%, respectively, at 300 mg q24h and by 44.6% and 27.5%, respectively, at 600 mg q24h. However, the confounding effect of between-study heterogeneity on target attainment for q24h regimens was considerable. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid dosing at 300 mg q12h may retain the efficacy of the 600 mg q12h licensed dosing with improved safety. Data to evaluate commonly used 300 mg q24h and 600 mg q24h doses are limited. Comprehensive, prospectively obtained PK/PD data for linezolid doses in drug-resistant TB treatment are required. Oxford University Press 2018-07 2018-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6005026/ /pubmed/29584861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky096 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Millard, James Pertinez, Henry Bonnett, Laura Hodel, Eva Maria Dartois, Véronique Johnson, John L Caws, Maxine Tiberi, Simon Bolhuis, Mathieu Alffenaar, Jan-Willem C Davies, Geraint Sloan, Derek J Linezolid pharmacokinetics in MDR-TB: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Monte Carlo simulation |
title | Linezolid pharmacokinetics in MDR-TB: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Monte Carlo simulation |
title_full | Linezolid pharmacokinetics in MDR-TB: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Monte Carlo simulation |
title_fullStr | Linezolid pharmacokinetics in MDR-TB: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Monte Carlo simulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Linezolid pharmacokinetics in MDR-TB: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Monte Carlo simulation |
title_short | Linezolid pharmacokinetics in MDR-TB: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Monte Carlo simulation |
title_sort | linezolid pharmacokinetics in mdr-tb: a systematic review, meta-analysis and monte carlo simulation |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29584861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky096 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millardjames linezolidpharmacokineticsinmdrtbasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmontecarlosimulation AT pertinezhenry linezolidpharmacokineticsinmdrtbasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmontecarlosimulation AT bonnettlaura linezolidpharmacokineticsinmdrtbasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmontecarlosimulation AT hodelevamaria linezolidpharmacokineticsinmdrtbasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmontecarlosimulation AT dartoisveronique linezolidpharmacokineticsinmdrtbasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmontecarlosimulation AT johnsonjohnl linezolidpharmacokineticsinmdrtbasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmontecarlosimulation AT cawsmaxine linezolidpharmacokineticsinmdrtbasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmontecarlosimulation AT tiberisimon linezolidpharmacokineticsinmdrtbasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmontecarlosimulation AT bolhuismathieu linezolidpharmacokineticsinmdrtbasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmontecarlosimulation AT alffenaarjanwillemc linezolidpharmacokineticsinmdrtbasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmontecarlosimulation AT daviesgeraint linezolidpharmacokineticsinmdrtbasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmontecarlosimulation AT sloanderekj linezolidpharmacokineticsinmdrtbasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmontecarlosimulation |