Cargando…
Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite
BACKGROUND: By an increase in use of composite restorations, some defects are also seen in these restorations, which need to be repaired. Since complete replacement of an old restoration may compromise the tooth structure, repair of defect is a more practical approach if there is no caries recurrenc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930769 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54030 |
_version_ | 1783332636807135232 |
---|---|
author | Ghavam, Maryam Naeemi, Maryam Hashemikamangar, Sedighe-Sadat Ebrahimi, Hooman Kharazifard, Mohammad-Javad |
author_facet | Ghavam, Maryam Naeemi, Maryam Hashemikamangar, Sedighe-Sadat Ebrahimi, Hooman Kharazifard, Mohammad-Javad |
author_sort | Ghavam, Maryam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: By an increase in use of composite restorations, some defects are also seen in these restorations, which need to be repaired. Since complete replacement of an old restoration may compromise the tooth structure, repair of defect is a more practical approach if there is no caries recurrence. Risk of pulp injury also decreases as such. One major challenge in restoration repair is to obtain a durable bond between the new and old composite. Laser irradiation has been suggested for surface preparation of old composite. This study aimed to assess the effect of composite surface preparation with Er,Cr:YSGG laser on microtensile bond strength to new composite. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 18 blocks were fabricated in three groups of nanohybrid, microhybrid and Beautiful II giomer measuring 4x7x7 mm and subjected to 10,000 thermal cycles between 5-55°C with 30 seconds of dwell time. The samples were randomly assigned to no surface treatment (etching and bonding) or laser plus etching and bonding groups. Composite cylinders measuring 4x7x7 mm were fabricated of Beautiful, nanohybrid and microhybrid composites on old composite surfaces and subjected to 500 thermal cycles for 50 seconds between 5-55°C with 30 seconds of dwell time. Each block was sectioned into 10 samples and they were subjected to microtensile bond strength test. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s test. RESULTS: In all composites, the mean bond strength in laser subgroups was higher than that in control subgroups except for giomer, which showed lower bond strength in laser subgroup. The lowest mean bond strength was noted in repair of Z350XT with Z350XT when the surface of old composite was etched (10.92 MPa). The highest mean bond strength was noted in repair of Z250 with giomer when the old composite surface was irradiated with laser (30.55 MPa). CONCLUSIONS: Er,Cr:YSGG laser plus etching increased the bond strength in all groups except for giomer group, which showed a reduction in bond strength. Key words:Composite resins, surface treatment, tensile bond strength, laser, er,cr:ysgg, giomer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6005082 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60050822018-06-21 Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite Ghavam, Maryam Naeemi, Maryam Hashemikamangar, Sedighe-Sadat Ebrahimi, Hooman Kharazifard, Mohammad-Javad J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: By an increase in use of composite restorations, some defects are also seen in these restorations, which need to be repaired. Since complete replacement of an old restoration may compromise the tooth structure, repair of defect is a more practical approach if there is no caries recurrence. Risk of pulp injury also decreases as such. One major challenge in restoration repair is to obtain a durable bond between the new and old composite. Laser irradiation has been suggested for surface preparation of old composite. This study aimed to assess the effect of composite surface preparation with Er,Cr:YSGG laser on microtensile bond strength to new composite. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 18 blocks were fabricated in three groups of nanohybrid, microhybrid and Beautiful II giomer measuring 4x7x7 mm and subjected to 10,000 thermal cycles between 5-55°C with 30 seconds of dwell time. The samples were randomly assigned to no surface treatment (etching and bonding) or laser plus etching and bonding groups. Composite cylinders measuring 4x7x7 mm were fabricated of Beautiful, nanohybrid and microhybrid composites on old composite surfaces and subjected to 500 thermal cycles for 50 seconds between 5-55°C with 30 seconds of dwell time. Each block was sectioned into 10 samples and they were subjected to microtensile bond strength test. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s test. RESULTS: In all composites, the mean bond strength in laser subgroups was higher than that in control subgroups except for giomer, which showed lower bond strength in laser subgroup. The lowest mean bond strength was noted in repair of Z350XT with Z350XT when the surface of old composite was etched (10.92 MPa). The highest mean bond strength was noted in repair of Z250 with giomer when the old composite surface was irradiated with laser (30.55 MPa). CONCLUSIONS: Er,Cr:YSGG laser plus etching increased the bond strength in all groups except for giomer group, which showed a reduction in bond strength. Key words:Composite resins, surface treatment, tensile bond strength, laser, er,cr:ysgg, giomer. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6005082/ /pubmed/29930769 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54030 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ghavam, Maryam Naeemi, Maryam Hashemikamangar, Sedighe-Sadat Ebrahimi, Hooman Kharazifard, Mohammad-Javad Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite |
title | Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface
treatment and type of composite |
title_full | Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface
treatment and type of composite |
title_fullStr | Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface
treatment and type of composite |
title_full_unstemmed | Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface
treatment and type of composite |
title_short | Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface
treatment and type of composite |
title_sort | repair bond strength of composite: effect of surface
treatment and type of composite |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930769 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54030 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghavammaryam repairbondstrengthofcompositeeffectofsurfacetreatmentandtypeofcomposite AT naeemimaryam repairbondstrengthofcompositeeffectofsurfacetreatmentandtypeofcomposite AT hashemikamangarsedighesadat repairbondstrengthofcompositeeffectofsurfacetreatmentandtypeofcomposite AT ebrahimihooman repairbondstrengthofcompositeeffectofsurfacetreatmentandtypeofcomposite AT kharazifardmohammadjavad repairbondstrengthofcompositeeffectofsurfacetreatmentandtypeofcomposite |