Cargando…

Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite

BACKGROUND: By an increase in use of composite restorations, some defects are also seen in these restorations, which need to be repaired. Since complete replacement of an old restoration may compromise the tooth structure, repair of defect is a more practical approach if there is no caries recurrenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghavam, Maryam, Naeemi, Maryam, Hashemikamangar, Sedighe-Sadat, Ebrahimi, Hooman, Kharazifard, Mohammad-Javad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930769
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54030
_version_ 1783332636807135232
author Ghavam, Maryam
Naeemi, Maryam
Hashemikamangar, Sedighe-Sadat
Ebrahimi, Hooman
Kharazifard, Mohammad-Javad
author_facet Ghavam, Maryam
Naeemi, Maryam
Hashemikamangar, Sedighe-Sadat
Ebrahimi, Hooman
Kharazifard, Mohammad-Javad
author_sort Ghavam, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: By an increase in use of composite restorations, some defects are also seen in these restorations, which need to be repaired. Since complete replacement of an old restoration may compromise the tooth structure, repair of defect is a more practical approach if there is no caries recurrence. Risk of pulp injury also decreases as such. One major challenge in restoration repair is to obtain a durable bond between the new and old composite. Laser irradiation has been suggested for surface preparation of old composite. This study aimed to assess the effect of composite surface preparation with Er,Cr:YSGG laser on microtensile bond strength to new composite. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 18 blocks were fabricated in three groups of nanohybrid, microhybrid and Beautiful II giomer measuring 4x7x7 mm and subjected to 10,000 thermal cycles between 5-55°C with 30 seconds of dwell time. The samples were randomly assigned to no surface treatment (etching and bonding) or laser plus etching and bonding groups. Composite cylinders measuring 4x7x7 mm were fabricated of Beautiful, nanohybrid and microhybrid composites on old composite surfaces and subjected to 500 thermal cycles for 50 seconds between 5-55°C with 30 seconds of dwell time. Each block was sectioned into 10 samples and they were subjected to microtensile bond strength test. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s test. RESULTS: In all composites, the mean bond strength in laser subgroups was higher than that in control subgroups except for giomer, which showed lower bond strength in laser subgroup. The lowest mean bond strength was noted in repair of Z350XT with Z350XT when the surface of old composite was etched (10.92 MPa). The highest mean bond strength was noted in repair of Z250 with giomer when the old composite surface was irradiated with laser (30.55 MPa). CONCLUSIONS: Er,Cr:YSGG laser plus etching increased the bond strength in all groups except for giomer group, which showed a reduction in bond strength. Key words:Composite resins, surface treatment, tensile bond strength, laser, er,cr:ysgg, giomer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6005082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60050822018-06-21 Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite Ghavam, Maryam Naeemi, Maryam Hashemikamangar, Sedighe-Sadat Ebrahimi, Hooman Kharazifard, Mohammad-Javad J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: By an increase in use of composite restorations, some defects are also seen in these restorations, which need to be repaired. Since complete replacement of an old restoration may compromise the tooth structure, repair of defect is a more practical approach if there is no caries recurrence. Risk of pulp injury also decreases as such. One major challenge in restoration repair is to obtain a durable bond between the new and old composite. Laser irradiation has been suggested for surface preparation of old composite. This study aimed to assess the effect of composite surface preparation with Er,Cr:YSGG laser on microtensile bond strength to new composite. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 18 blocks were fabricated in three groups of nanohybrid, microhybrid and Beautiful II giomer measuring 4x7x7 mm and subjected to 10,000 thermal cycles between 5-55°C with 30 seconds of dwell time. The samples were randomly assigned to no surface treatment (etching and bonding) or laser plus etching and bonding groups. Composite cylinders measuring 4x7x7 mm were fabricated of Beautiful, nanohybrid and microhybrid composites on old composite surfaces and subjected to 500 thermal cycles for 50 seconds between 5-55°C with 30 seconds of dwell time. Each block was sectioned into 10 samples and they were subjected to microtensile bond strength test. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s test. RESULTS: In all composites, the mean bond strength in laser subgroups was higher than that in control subgroups except for giomer, which showed lower bond strength in laser subgroup. The lowest mean bond strength was noted in repair of Z350XT with Z350XT when the surface of old composite was etched (10.92 MPa). The highest mean bond strength was noted in repair of Z250 with giomer when the old composite surface was irradiated with laser (30.55 MPa). CONCLUSIONS: Er,Cr:YSGG laser plus etching increased the bond strength in all groups except for giomer group, which showed a reduction in bond strength. Key words:Composite resins, surface treatment, tensile bond strength, laser, er,cr:ysgg, giomer. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6005082/ /pubmed/29930769 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54030 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ghavam, Maryam
Naeemi, Maryam
Hashemikamangar, Sedighe-Sadat
Ebrahimi, Hooman
Kharazifard, Mohammad-Javad
Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite
title Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite
title_full Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite
title_fullStr Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite
title_full_unstemmed Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite
title_short Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite
title_sort repair bond strength of composite: effect of surface treatment and type of composite
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930769
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54030
work_keys_str_mv AT ghavammaryam repairbondstrengthofcompositeeffectofsurfacetreatmentandtypeofcomposite
AT naeemimaryam repairbondstrengthofcompositeeffectofsurfacetreatmentandtypeofcomposite
AT hashemikamangarsedighesadat repairbondstrengthofcompositeeffectofsurfacetreatmentandtypeofcomposite
AT ebrahimihooman repairbondstrengthofcompositeeffectofsurfacetreatmentandtypeofcomposite
AT kharazifardmohammadjavad repairbondstrengthofcompositeeffectofsurfacetreatmentandtypeofcomposite