Cargando…

The effect of different force magnitudes for placement of orthodontic brackets on shear bond strength, in three adhesive systems

BACKGROUND: Amount of pressure exerting on orthodontic brackets during bonding can create different thickness of adhesive and affect shear bonding strength(SBS) in different adhesive systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different force magnitudes for placement of brackets...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammadi, Amir, Pourkhameneh, Sohrab, Sadrhaghighi, Amir-Houman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930773
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54733
_version_ 1783332637771825152
author Mohammadi, Amir
Pourkhameneh, Sohrab
Sadrhaghighi, Amir-Houman
author_facet Mohammadi, Amir
Pourkhameneh, Sohrab
Sadrhaghighi, Amir-Houman
author_sort Mohammadi, Amir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Amount of pressure exerting on orthodontic brackets during bonding can create different thickness of adhesive and affect shear bonding strength(SBS) in different adhesive systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different force magnitudes for placement of brackets on SBS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an in vitro study, 420 brackets were placed on the bovine teeth, using three types of adhesives, Concise (chemically cured two-paste mix), Unite (chemically cured no mix), and Transbond XT( light cured), with the application of seven force magnitudes of 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 600 and 1000 grams in twenty-one groups of twenty samples each. SBS means (using two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test) and adhesive remnant index were compared between these twenty-one groups. RESULTS: SBS increased with an increase in force. No increase in Transbond XT SBS happened after 400 grams. In addition, Transbond XT had the lowest bond strength among three adhesives (p<0.001). Adhesive remnant index (ARI) results also indicated a shift in the failure mode from bracket-adhesive interface to adhesive-enamel interface, as the bonding force got heavier (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The force applied on bracket during bonding influences the SBS. In order to have higher bond strength, application of heavy force would be advisable. It is also recommended that constant forces be applied for bracket bonding in future studies. Key words:Adhesive, ARI, Bonding procedures, SBS, shear bond strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6005086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60050862018-06-21 The effect of different force magnitudes for placement of orthodontic brackets on shear bond strength, in three adhesive systems Mohammadi, Amir Pourkhameneh, Sohrab Sadrhaghighi, Amir-Houman J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: Amount of pressure exerting on orthodontic brackets during bonding can create different thickness of adhesive and affect shear bonding strength(SBS) in different adhesive systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different force magnitudes for placement of brackets on SBS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an in vitro study, 420 brackets were placed on the bovine teeth, using three types of adhesives, Concise (chemically cured two-paste mix), Unite (chemically cured no mix), and Transbond XT( light cured), with the application of seven force magnitudes of 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 600 and 1000 grams in twenty-one groups of twenty samples each. SBS means (using two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test) and adhesive remnant index were compared between these twenty-one groups. RESULTS: SBS increased with an increase in force. No increase in Transbond XT SBS happened after 400 grams. In addition, Transbond XT had the lowest bond strength among three adhesives (p<0.001). Adhesive remnant index (ARI) results also indicated a shift in the failure mode from bracket-adhesive interface to adhesive-enamel interface, as the bonding force got heavier (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The force applied on bracket during bonding influences the SBS. In order to have higher bond strength, application of heavy force would be advisable. It is also recommended that constant forces be applied for bracket bonding in future studies. Key words:Adhesive, ARI, Bonding procedures, SBS, shear bond strength. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6005086/ /pubmed/29930773 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54733 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Mohammadi, Amir
Pourkhameneh, Sohrab
Sadrhaghighi, Amir-Houman
The effect of different force magnitudes for placement of orthodontic brackets on shear bond strength, in three adhesive systems
title The effect of different force magnitudes for placement of orthodontic brackets on shear bond strength, in three adhesive systems
title_full The effect of different force magnitudes for placement of orthodontic brackets on shear bond strength, in three adhesive systems
title_fullStr The effect of different force magnitudes for placement of orthodontic brackets on shear bond strength, in three adhesive systems
title_full_unstemmed The effect of different force magnitudes for placement of orthodontic brackets on shear bond strength, in three adhesive systems
title_short The effect of different force magnitudes for placement of orthodontic brackets on shear bond strength, in three adhesive systems
title_sort effect of different force magnitudes for placement of orthodontic brackets on shear bond strength, in three adhesive systems
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930773
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54733
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadiamir theeffectofdifferentforcemagnitudesforplacementoforthodonticbracketsonshearbondstrengthinthreeadhesivesystems
AT pourkhamenehsohrab theeffectofdifferentforcemagnitudesforplacementoforthodonticbracketsonshearbondstrengthinthreeadhesivesystems
AT sadrhaghighiamirhouman theeffectofdifferentforcemagnitudesforplacementoforthodonticbracketsonshearbondstrengthinthreeadhesivesystems
AT mohammadiamir effectofdifferentforcemagnitudesforplacementoforthodonticbracketsonshearbondstrengthinthreeadhesivesystems
AT pourkhamenehsohrab effectofdifferentforcemagnitudesforplacementoforthodonticbracketsonshearbondstrengthinthreeadhesivesystems
AT sadrhaghighiamirhouman effectofdifferentforcemagnitudesforplacementoforthodonticbracketsonshearbondstrengthinthreeadhesivesystems