Cargando…

Comparative study of debris and smear layer removal with EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser

BACKGROUND: To evaluate in vitro, the ability in removing debris and Smear Layer of 17% EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 58 unirradicular teeth were instrumented with MTwo® and divided into 3 groups according to irrigation protocol: 17%EDTA, laser and a combination of 17%EDTA and las...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montero-Miralles, Paloma, Torres-Lagares, Daniel, Segura-Egea, Juan-Jose, Serrera-Figallo, Maria-Ángeles, Gutierrez-Perez, Jose-Luis, Castillo-Dali, Gabriel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930779
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54936
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To evaluate in vitro, the ability in removing debris and Smear Layer of 17% EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 58 unirradicular teeth were instrumented with MTwo® and divided into 3 groups according to irrigation protocol: 17%EDTA, laser and a combination of 17%EDTA and laser. All samples were analyzed in the apical and middle third with Scanning Electron Microscope. The Chi-cuadrado and McNemar tests were used to determine the statistical analysis and data processing and analysis was performed with the statistical package StatGraphics Centurion XVI. RESULTS: Debris analysis showed statistical significant differences when compared EDTA vs laser and EDTA vs EDTA+laser in the middle third. The Smear Layer removal showed statistical significant differences in the middle third when compared EDTA vs laser and EDTA vs EDTA+laser. CONCLUSIONS: Laser showed a greater cleaning capacity than EDTA in the middle third; the cleanliness was even better when combined laser with EDTA, so the effect is accumulative. Key words:Root canal treatment, Smear Layer, Er,Cr:YSGG laser, debridement.