Cargando…

Comparative study of debris and smear layer removal with EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser

BACKGROUND: To evaluate in vitro, the ability in removing debris and Smear Layer of 17% EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 58 unirradicular teeth were instrumented with MTwo® and divided into 3 groups according to irrigation protocol: 17%EDTA, laser and a combination of 17%EDTA and las...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montero-Miralles, Paloma, Torres-Lagares, Daniel, Segura-Egea, Juan-Jose, Serrera-Figallo, Maria-Ángeles, Gutierrez-Perez, Jose-Luis, Castillo-Dali, Gabriel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930779
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54936
_version_ 1783332639151751168
author Montero-Miralles, Paloma
Torres-Lagares, Daniel
Segura-Egea, Juan-Jose
Serrera-Figallo, Maria-Ángeles
Gutierrez-Perez, Jose-Luis
Castillo-Dali, Gabriel
author_facet Montero-Miralles, Paloma
Torres-Lagares, Daniel
Segura-Egea, Juan-Jose
Serrera-Figallo, Maria-Ángeles
Gutierrez-Perez, Jose-Luis
Castillo-Dali, Gabriel
author_sort Montero-Miralles, Paloma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate in vitro, the ability in removing debris and Smear Layer of 17% EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 58 unirradicular teeth were instrumented with MTwo® and divided into 3 groups according to irrigation protocol: 17%EDTA, laser and a combination of 17%EDTA and laser. All samples were analyzed in the apical and middle third with Scanning Electron Microscope. The Chi-cuadrado and McNemar tests were used to determine the statistical analysis and data processing and analysis was performed with the statistical package StatGraphics Centurion XVI. RESULTS: Debris analysis showed statistical significant differences when compared EDTA vs laser and EDTA vs EDTA+laser in the middle third. The Smear Layer removal showed statistical significant differences in the middle third when compared EDTA vs laser and EDTA vs EDTA+laser. CONCLUSIONS: Laser showed a greater cleaning capacity than EDTA in the middle third; the cleanliness was even better when combined laser with EDTA, so the effect is accumulative. Key words:Root canal treatment, Smear Layer, Er,Cr:YSGG laser, debridement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6005092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60050922018-06-21 Comparative study of debris and smear layer removal with EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser Montero-Miralles, Paloma Torres-Lagares, Daniel Segura-Egea, Juan-Jose Serrera-Figallo, Maria-Ángeles Gutierrez-Perez, Jose-Luis Castillo-Dali, Gabriel J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate in vitro, the ability in removing debris and Smear Layer of 17% EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 58 unirradicular teeth were instrumented with MTwo® and divided into 3 groups according to irrigation protocol: 17%EDTA, laser and a combination of 17%EDTA and laser. All samples were analyzed in the apical and middle third with Scanning Electron Microscope. The Chi-cuadrado and McNemar tests were used to determine the statistical analysis and data processing and analysis was performed with the statistical package StatGraphics Centurion XVI. RESULTS: Debris analysis showed statistical significant differences when compared EDTA vs laser and EDTA vs EDTA+laser in the middle third. The Smear Layer removal showed statistical significant differences in the middle third when compared EDTA vs laser and EDTA vs EDTA+laser. CONCLUSIONS: Laser showed a greater cleaning capacity than EDTA in the middle third; the cleanliness was even better when combined laser with EDTA, so the effect is accumulative. Key words:Root canal treatment, Smear Layer, Er,Cr:YSGG laser, debridement. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6005092/ /pubmed/29930779 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54936 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Montero-Miralles, Paloma
Torres-Lagares, Daniel
Segura-Egea, Juan-Jose
Serrera-Figallo, Maria-Ángeles
Gutierrez-Perez, Jose-Luis
Castillo-Dali, Gabriel
Comparative study of debris and smear layer removal with EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser
title Comparative study of debris and smear layer removal with EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser
title_full Comparative study of debris and smear layer removal with EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser
title_fullStr Comparative study of debris and smear layer removal with EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of debris and smear layer removal with EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser
title_short Comparative study of debris and smear layer removal with EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser
title_sort comparative study of debris and smear layer removal with edta and er,cr:ysgg laser
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930779
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54936
work_keys_str_mv AT monteromirallespaloma comparativestudyofdebrisandsmearlayerremovalwithedtaandercrysgglaser
AT torreslagaresdaniel comparativestudyofdebrisandsmearlayerremovalwithedtaandercrysgglaser
AT seguraegeajuanjose comparativestudyofdebrisandsmearlayerremovalwithedtaandercrysgglaser
AT serrerafigallomariaangeles comparativestudyofdebrisandsmearlayerremovalwithedtaandercrysgglaser
AT gutierrezperezjoseluis comparativestudyofdebrisandsmearlayerremovalwithedtaandercrysgglaser
AT castillodaligabriel comparativestudyofdebrisandsmearlayerremovalwithedtaandercrysgglaser