Cargando…

Prediction models for the development of COPD: a systematic review

Early identification of people at risk of developing COPD is crucial for implementing preventive strategies. We aimed to systematically review and assess the performance of all published models that predicted development of COPD. A search was conducted to identify studies that developed a prediction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matheson, Melanie C, Bowatte, Gayan, Perret, Jennifer L, Lowe, Adrian J, Senaratna, Chamara V, Hall, Graham L, de Klerk, Nick, Keogh, Louise A, McDonald, Christine F, Waidyatillake, Nilakshi T, Sly, Peter D, Jarvis, Deborah, Abramson, Michael J, Lodge, Caroline J, Dharmage, Shyamali C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942125
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S155675
_version_ 1783332665925042176
author Matheson, Melanie C
Bowatte, Gayan
Perret, Jennifer L
Lowe, Adrian J
Senaratna, Chamara V
Hall, Graham L
de Klerk, Nick
Keogh, Louise A
McDonald, Christine F
Waidyatillake, Nilakshi T
Sly, Peter D
Jarvis, Deborah
Abramson, Michael J
Lodge, Caroline J
Dharmage, Shyamali C
author_facet Matheson, Melanie C
Bowatte, Gayan
Perret, Jennifer L
Lowe, Adrian J
Senaratna, Chamara V
Hall, Graham L
de Klerk, Nick
Keogh, Louise A
McDonald, Christine F
Waidyatillake, Nilakshi T
Sly, Peter D
Jarvis, Deborah
Abramson, Michael J
Lodge, Caroline J
Dharmage, Shyamali C
author_sort Matheson, Melanie C
collection PubMed
description Early identification of people at risk of developing COPD is crucial for implementing preventive strategies. We aimed to systematically review and assess the performance of all published models that predicted development of COPD. A search was conducted to identify studies that developed a prediction model for COPD development. The Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies was followed when extracting data and appraising the selected studies. Of the 4,481 records identified, 30 articles were selected for full-text review, and only four of these were eligible to be included in the review. The only consistent predictor across all four models was a measure of smoking. Sex and age were used in most models; however, other factors varied widely. Two of the models had good ability to discriminate between people who were correctly or incorrectly classified as at risk of developing COPD. Overall none of the models were particularly useful in accurately predicting future risk of COPD, nor were they good at ruling out future risk of COPD. Further studies are needed to develop new prediction models and robustly validate them in external cohorts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6005295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60052952018-06-25 Prediction models for the development of COPD: a systematic review Matheson, Melanie C Bowatte, Gayan Perret, Jennifer L Lowe, Adrian J Senaratna, Chamara V Hall, Graham L de Klerk, Nick Keogh, Louise A McDonald, Christine F Waidyatillake, Nilakshi T Sly, Peter D Jarvis, Deborah Abramson, Michael J Lodge, Caroline J Dharmage, Shyamali C Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research Early identification of people at risk of developing COPD is crucial for implementing preventive strategies. We aimed to systematically review and assess the performance of all published models that predicted development of COPD. A search was conducted to identify studies that developed a prediction model for COPD development. The Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies was followed when extracting data and appraising the selected studies. Of the 4,481 records identified, 30 articles were selected for full-text review, and only four of these were eligible to be included in the review. The only consistent predictor across all four models was a measure of smoking. Sex and age were used in most models; however, other factors varied widely. Two of the models had good ability to discriminate between people who were correctly or incorrectly classified as at risk of developing COPD. Overall none of the models were particularly useful in accurately predicting future risk of COPD, nor were they good at ruling out future risk of COPD. Further studies are needed to develop new prediction models and robustly validate them in external cohorts. Dove Medical Press 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6005295/ /pubmed/29942125 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S155675 Text en © 2018 Matheson et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Matheson, Melanie C
Bowatte, Gayan
Perret, Jennifer L
Lowe, Adrian J
Senaratna, Chamara V
Hall, Graham L
de Klerk, Nick
Keogh, Louise A
McDonald, Christine F
Waidyatillake, Nilakshi T
Sly, Peter D
Jarvis, Deborah
Abramson, Michael J
Lodge, Caroline J
Dharmage, Shyamali C
Prediction models for the development of COPD: a systematic review
title Prediction models for the development of COPD: a systematic review
title_full Prediction models for the development of COPD: a systematic review
title_fullStr Prediction models for the development of COPD: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Prediction models for the development of COPD: a systematic review
title_short Prediction models for the development of COPD: a systematic review
title_sort prediction models for the development of copd: a systematic review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942125
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S155675
work_keys_str_mv AT mathesonmelaniec predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview
AT bowattegayan predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview
AT perretjenniferl predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview
AT loweadrianj predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview
AT senaratnachamarav predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview
AT hallgrahaml predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview
AT deklerknick predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview
AT keoghlouisea predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview
AT mcdonaldchristinef predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview
AT waidyatillakenilakshit predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview
AT slypeterd predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview
AT jarvisdeborah predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview
AT abramsonmichaelj predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview
AT lodgecarolinej predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview
AT dharmageshyamalic predictionmodelsforthedevelopmentofcopdasystematicreview