Cargando…

Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Depressive and anxiety symptoms could seriously affect the quality of life of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) subjects. Currently, little is known about the efficacy and acceptability of agomelatine versus fluoxetine in treating these symptoms in T2DM subjects. Therefore, this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Che, Tingting, Teng, Xiaochun, Huang, Qun, Mu, Yanfei, Tang, Xianjun, Mu, Xiaosong, Wei, Youneng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942131
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S167608
_version_ 1783332673018658816
author Che, Tingting
Teng, Xiaochun
Huang, Qun
Mu, Yanfei
Tang, Xianjun
Mu, Xiaosong
Wei, Youneng
author_facet Che, Tingting
Teng, Xiaochun
Huang, Qun
Mu, Yanfei
Tang, Xianjun
Mu, Xiaosong
Wei, Youneng
author_sort Che, Tingting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Depressive and anxiety symptoms could seriously affect the quality of life of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) subjects. Currently, little is known about the efficacy and acceptability of agomelatine versus fluoxetine in treating these symptoms in T2DM subjects. Therefore, this study was performed to find out which one was better in treating these symptoms in T2DM subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T2DM subjects with depressive and anxiety symptoms were randomly assigned to receive either fluoxetine (30–40 mg/day) or agomelatine (25–50 mg/day). The treatment was continued for 12 weeks. The data of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) were collected (at baseline and also at weeks 4, 8 and 12) to assess the depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively. The metabolic parameters, including body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. The treatment-related adverse events during the scheduled treatment period were recorded to compare the acceptability of these two drugs. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, the average HDRS and HARS scores were significantly decreased in both groups. The average HDRS scores were not significantly different between the two groups, although the agomelatine group had a lower average HDRS score. The response and remission rates were similar between the two groups, and these two drugs had no significant effects on BMI and FPG. However, compared with the fluoxetine group, the agomelatine group had the significantly lower average HARS score (p=0.0017) and lower average HbA1c level (p<0.00001). Moreover, the incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the agomelatine group than in the fluoxetine group (p=0.032). CONCLUSION: Both fluoxetine and agomelatine could effectively reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms in T2DM subjects, but agomelatine might be more effective and acceptable. Future studies with more subjects are needed to support and validate our conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6005323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60053232018-06-25 Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial Che, Tingting Teng, Xiaochun Huang, Qun Mu, Yanfei Tang, Xianjun Mu, Xiaosong Wei, Youneng Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research BACKGROUND: Depressive and anxiety symptoms could seriously affect the quality of life of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) subjects. Currently, little is known about the efficacy and acceptability of agomelatine versus fluoxetine in treating these symptoms in T2DM subjects. Therefore, this study was performed to find out which one was better in treating these symptoms in T2DM subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T2DM subjects with depressive and anxiety symptoms were randomly assigned to receive either fluoxetine (30–40 mg/day) or agomelatine (25–50 mg/day). The treatment was continued for 12 weeks. The data of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) were collected (at baseline and also at weeks 4, 8 and 12) to assess the depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively. The metabolic parameters, including body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. The treatment-related adverse events during the scheduled treatment period were recorded to compare the acceptability of these two drugs. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, the average HDRS and HARS scores were significantly decreased in both groups. The average HDRS scores were not significantly different between the two groups, although the agomelatine group had a lower average HDRS score. The response and remission rates were similar between the two groups, and these two drugs had no significant effects on BMI and FPG. However, compared with the fluoxetine group, the agomelatine group had the significantly lower average HARS score (p=0.0017) and lower average HbA1c level (p<0.00001). Moreover, the incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the agomelatine group than in the fluoxetine group (p=0.032). CONCLUSION: Both fluoxetine and agomelatine could effectively reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms in T2DM subjects, but agomelatine might be more effective and acceptable. Future studies with more subjects are needed to support and validate our conclusion. Dove Medical Press 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6005323/ /pubmed/29942131 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S167608 Text en © 2018 Che et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Che, Tingting
Teng, Xiaochun
Huang, Qun
Mu, Yanfei
Tang, Xianjun
Mu, Xiaosong
Wei, Youneng
Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial
title Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial
title_full Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial
title_short Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial
title_sort agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942131
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S167608
work_keys_str_mv AT chetingting agomelatineversusfluoxetineinglycemiccontrolandtreatingdepressiveandanxietysymptomsintype2diabetesmellitussubjectsasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tengxiaochun agomelatineversusfluoxetineinglycemiccontrolandtreatingdepressiveandanxietysymptomsintype2diabetesmellitussubjectsasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT huangqun agomelatineversusfluoxetineinglycemiccontrolandtreatingdepressiveandanxietysymptomsintype2diabetesmellitussubjectsasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT muyanfei agomelatineversusfluoxetineinglycemiccontrolandtreatingdepressiveandanxietysymptomsintype2diabetesmellitussubjectsasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tangxianjun agomelatineversusfluoxetineinglycemiccontrolandtreatingdepressiveandanxietysymptomsintype2diabetesmellitussubjectsasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT muxiaosong agomelatineversusfluoxetineinglycemiccontrolandtreatingdepressiveandanxietysymptomsintype2diabetesmellitussubjectsasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weiyouneng agomelatineversusfluoxetineinglycemiccontrolandtreatingdepressiveandanxietysymptomsintype2diabetesmellitussubjectsasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial