Cargando…
Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Depressive and anxiety symptoms could seriously affect the quality of life of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) subjects. Currently, little is known about the efficacy and acceptability of agomelatine versus fluoxetine in treating these symptoms in T2DM subjects. Therefore, this study was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942131 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S167608 |
_version_ | 1783332673018658816 |
---|---|
author | Che, Tingting Teng, Xiaochun Huang, Qun Mu, Yanfei Tang, Xianjun Mu, Xiaosong Wei, Youneng |
author_facet | Che, Tingting Teng, Xiaochun Huang, Qun Mu, Yanfei Tang, Xianjun Mu, Xiaosong Wei, Youneng |
author_sort | Che, Tingting |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Depressive and anxiety symptoms could seriously affect the quality of life of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) subjects. Currently, little is known about the efficacy and acceptability of agomelatine versus fluoxetine in treating these symptoms in T2DM subjects. Therefore, this study was performed to find out which one was better in treating these symptoms in T2DM subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T2DM subjects with depressive and anxiety symptoms were randomly assigned to receive either fluoxetine (30–40 mg/day) or agomelatine (25–50 mg/day). The treatment was continued for 12 weeks. The data of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) were collected (at baseline and also at weeks 4, 8 and 12) to assess the depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively. The metabolic parameters, including body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. The treatment-related adverse events during the scheduled treatment period were recorded to compare the acceptability of these two drugs. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, the average HDRS and HARS scores were significantly decreased in both groups. The average HDRS scores were not significantly different between the two groups, although the agomelatine group had a lower average HDRS score. The response and remission rates were similar between the two groups, and these two drugs had no significant effects on BMI and FPG. However, compared with the fluoxetine group, the agomelatine group had the significantly lower average HARS score (p=0.0017) and lower average HbA1c level (p<0.00001). Moreover, the incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the agomelatine group than in the fluoxetine group (p=0.032). CONCLUSION: Both fluoxetine and agomelatine could effectively reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms in T2DM subjects, but agomelatine might be more effective and acceptable. Future studies with more subjects are needed to support and validate our conclusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6005323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60053232018-06-25 Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial Che, Tingting Teng, Xiaochun Huang, Qun Mu, Yanfei Tang, Xianjun Mu, Xiaosong Wei, Youneng Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research BACKGROUND: Depressive and anxiety symptoms could seriously affect the quality of life of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) subjects. Currently, little is known about the efficacy and acceptability of agomelatine versus fluoxetine in treating these symptoms in T2DM subjects. Therefore, this study was performed to find out which one was better in treating these symptoms in T2DM subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T2DM subjects with depressive and anxiety symptoms were randomly assigned to receive either fluoxetine (30–40 mg/day) or agomelatine (25–50 mg/day). The treatment was continued for 12 weeks. The data of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) were collected (at baseline and also at weeks 4, 8 and 12) to assess the depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively. The metabolic parameters, including body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. The treatment-related adverse events during the scheduled treatment period were recorded to compare the acceptability of these two drugs. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, the average HDRS and HARS scores were significantly decreased in both groups. The average HDRS scores were not significantly different between the two groups, although the agomelatine group had a lower average HDRS score. The response and remission rates were similar between the two groups, and these two drugs had no significant effects on BMI and FPG. However, compared with the fluoxetine group, the agomelatine group had the significantly lower average HARS score (p=0.0017) and lower average HbA1c level (p<0.00001). Moreover, the incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the agomelatine group than in the fluoxetine group (p=0.032). CONCLUSION: Both fluoxetine and agomelatine could effectively reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms in T2DM subjects, but agomelatine might be more effective and acceptable. Future studies with more subjects are needed to support and validate our conclusion. Dove Medical Press 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6005323/ /pubmed/29942131 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S167608 Text en © 2018 Che et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Che, Tingting Teng, Xiaochun Huang, Qun Mu, Yanfei Tang, Xianjun Mu, Xiaosong Wei, Youneng Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial |
title | Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | agomelatine versus fluoxetine in glycemic control and treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29942131 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S167608 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chetingting agomelatineversusfluoxetineinglycemiccontrolandtreatingdepressiveandanxietysymptomsintype2diabetesmellitussubjectsasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tengxiaochun agomelatineversusfluoxetineinglycemiccontrolandtreatingdepressiveandanxietysymptomsintype2diabetesmellitussubjectsasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT huangqun agomelatineversusfluoxetineinglycemiccontrolandtreatingdepressiveandanxietysymptomsintype2diabetesmellitussubjectsasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT muyanfei agomelatineversusfluoxetineinglycemiccontrolandtreatingdepressiveandanxietysymptomsintype2diabetesmellitussubjectsasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tangxianjun agomelatineversusfluoxetineinglycemiccontrolandtreatingdepressiveandanxietysymptomsintype2diabetesmellitussubjectsasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT muxiaosong agomelatineversusfluoxetineinglycemiccontrolandtreatingdepressiveandanxietysymptomsintype2diabetesmellitussubjectsasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT weiyouneng agomelatineversusfluoxetineinglycemiccontrolandtreatingdepressiveandanxietysymptomsintype2diabetesmellitussubjectsasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial |