Cargando…
Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression
Introduction: Although knowledge about negative effects of coercive measures in psychiatry exists, its prevalence is still high in clinical routine. This study aimed at define risk factors and test machine learning algorithms for their accuracy in the prediction of the risk to being subjected to coe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29946273 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00258 |
_version_ | 1783332744275689472 |
---|---|
author | Hotzy, Florian Theodoridou, Anastasia Hoff, Paul Schneeberger, Andres R. Seifritz, Erich Olbrich, Sebastian Jäger, Matthias |
author_facet | Hotzy, Florian Theodoridou, Anastasia Hoff, Paul Schneeberger, Andres R. Seifritz, Erich Olbrich, Sebastian Jäger, Matthias |
author_sort | Hotzy, Florian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Although knowledge about negative effects of coercive measures in psychiatry exists, its prevalence is still high in clinical routine. This study aimed at define risk factors and test machine learning algorithms for their accuracy in the prediction of the risk to being subjected to coercive measures. Methods: In a sample of involuntarily hospitalized patients (n = 393) at the University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, we analyzed risk factors for the experience of coercion (n = 170 patients) using chi-square tests and Mann Whitney U tests. We trained machine learning algorithms [logistic regression, Supported Vector Machine (SVM), and decision trees] with these risk factors and tested obtained models for their accuracy via five-fold cross validation. To verify the results we compared them to binary logistic regression. Results: In a model with 8 risk-factors which were available at admission, the SVM algorithm identified 102 out of 170 patients, which had experienced coercion and 174 out of 223 patients without coercion (69% accuracy with 60% sensitivity and 78% specificity, AUC 0.74). In a model with 18 risk-factors, available after discharge, the logistic regression algorithm identified 121 out of 170 with and 176 out of 223 without coercion (75% accuracy, 71% sensitivity, and 79% specificity, AUC 0.82). Discussion: Incorporating both clinical and demographic variables can help to estimate the risk of experiencing coercion for psychiatric patients. This study could show that trained machine learning algorithms are comparable to binary logistic regression and can reach a good or even excellent area under the curve (AUC) in the prediction of the outcome coercion/no coercion when cross validation is used. Due to the better generalizability machine learning is a promising approach for further studies, especially when more variables are analyzed. More detailed knowledge about individual risk factors may help to prevent the occurrence of situations involving coercion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6005877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60058772018-06-26 Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression Hotzy, Florian Theodoridou, Anastasia Hoff, Paul Schneeberger, Andres R. Seifritz, Erich Olbrich, Sebastian Jäger, Matthias Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Introduction: Although knowledge about negative effects of coercive measures in psychiatry exists, its prevalence is still high in clinical routine. This study aimed at define risk factors and test machine learning algorithms for their accuracy in the prediction of the risk to being subjected to coercive measures. Methods: In a sample of involuntarily hospitalized patients (n = 393) at the University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, we analyzed risk factors for the experience of coercion (n = 170 patients) using chi-square tests and Mann Whitney U tests. We trained machine learning algorithms [logistic regression, Supported Vector Machine (SVM), and decision trees] with these risk factors and tested obtained models for their accuracy via five-fold cross validation. To verify the results we compared them to binary logistic regression. Results: In a model with 8 risk-factors which were available at admission, the SVM algorithm identified 102 out of 170 patients, which had experienced coercion and 174 out of 223 patients without coercion (69% accuracy with 60% sensitivity and 78% specificity, AUC 0.74). In a model with 18 risk-factors, available after discharge, the logistic regression algorithm identified 121 out of 170 with and 176 out of 223 without coercion (75% accuracy, 71% sensitivity, and 79% specificity, AUC 0.82). Discussion: Incorporating both clinical and demographic variables can help to estimate the risk of experiencing coercion for psychiatric patients. This study could show that trained machine learning algorithms are comparable to binary logistic regression and can reach a good or even excellent area under the curve (AUC) in the prediction of the outcome coercion/no coercion when cross validation is used. Due to the better generalizability machine learning is a promising approach for further studies, especially when more variables are analyzed. More detailed knowledge about individual risk factors may help to prevent the occurrence of situations involving coercion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6005877/ /pubmed/29946273 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00258 Text en Copyright © 2018 Hotzy, Theodoridou, Hoff, Schneeberger, Seifritz, Olbrich and Jäger. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Hotzy, Florian Theodoridou, Anastasia Hoff, Paul Schneeberger, Andres R. Seifritz, Erich Olbrich, Sebastian Jäger, Matthias Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression |
title | Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression |
title_full | Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression |
title_fullStr | Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression |
title_short | Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression |
title_sort | machine learning: an approach in identifying risk factors for coercion compared to binary logistic regression |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29946273 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00258 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hotzyflorian machinelearninganapproachinidentifyingriskfactorsforcoercioncomparedtobinarylogisticregression AT theodoridouanastasia machinelearninganapproachinidentifyingriskfactorsforcoercioncomparedtobinarylogisticregression AT hoffpaul machinelearninganapproachinidentifyingriskfactorsforcoercioncomparedtobinarylogisticregression AT schneebergerandresr machinelearninganapproachinidentifyingriskfactorsforcoercioncomparedtobinarylogisticregression AT seifritzerich machinelearninganapproachinidentifyingriskfactorsforcoercioncomparedtobinarylogisticregression AT olbrichsebastian machinelearninganapproachinidentifyingriskfactorsforcoercioncomparedtobinarylogisticregression AT jagermatthias machinelearninganapproachinidentifyingriskfactorsforcoercioncomparedtobinarylogisticregression |