Cargando…

Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression

Introduction: Although knowledge about negative effects of coercive measures in psychiatry exists, its prevalence is still high in clinical routine. This study aimed at define risk factors and test machine learning algorithms for their accuracy in the prediction of the risk to being subjected to coe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hotzy, Florian, Theodoridou, Anastasia, Hoff, Paul, Schneeberger, Andres R., Seifritz, Erich, Olbrich, Sebastian, Jäger, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29946273
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00258
_version_ 1783332744275689472
author Hotzy, Florian
Theodoridou, Anastasia
Hoff, Paul
Schneeberger, Andres R.
Seifritz, Erich
Olbrich, Sebastian
Jäger, Matthias
author_facet Hotzy, Florian
Theodoridou, Anastasia
Hoff, Paul
Schneeberger, Andres R.
Seifritz, Erich
Olbrich, Sebastian
Jäger, Matthias
author_sort Hotzy, Florian
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Although knowledge about negative effects of coercive measures in psychiatry exists, its prevalence is still high in clinical routine. This study aimed at define risk factors and test machine learning algorithms for their accuracy in the prediction of the risk to being subjected to coercive measures. Methods: In a sample of involuntarily hospitalized patients (n = 393) at the University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, we analyzed risk factors for the experience of coercion (n = 170 patients) using chi-square tests and Mann Whitney U tests. We trained machine learning algorithms [logistic regression, Supported Vector Machine (SVM), and decision trees] with these risk factors and tested obtained models for their accuracy via five-fold cross validation. To verify the results we compared them to binary logistic regression. Results: In a model with 8 risk-factors which were available at admission, the SVM algorithm identified 102 out of 170 patients, which had experienced coercion and 174 out of 223 patients without coercion (69% accuracy with 60% sensitivity and 78% specificity, AUC 0.74). In a model with 18 risk-factors, available after discharge, the logistic regression algorithm identified 121 out of 170 with and 176 out of 223 without coercion (75% accuracy, 71% sensitivity, and 79% specificity, AUC 0.82). Discussion: Incorporating both clinical and demographic variables can help to estimate the risk of experiencing coercion for psychiatric patients. This study could show that trained machine learning algorithms are comparable to binary logistic regression and can reach a good or even excellent area under the curve (AUC) in the prediction of the outcome coercion/no coercion when cross validation is used. Due to the better generalizability machine learning is a promising approach for further studies, especially when more variables are analyzed. More detailed knowledge about individual risk factors may help to prevent the occurrence of situations involving coercion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6005877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60058772018-06-26 Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression Hotzy, Florian Theodoridou, Anastasia Hoff, Paul Schneeberger, Andres R. Seifritz, Erich Olbrich, Sebastian Jäger, Matthias Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Introduction: Although knowledge about negative effects of coercive measures in psychiatry exists, its prevalence is still high in clinical routine. This study aimed at define risk factors and test machine learning algorithms for their accuracy in the prediction of the risk to being subjected to coercive measures. Methods: In a sample of involuntarily hospitalized patients (n = 393) at the University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, we analyzed risk factors for the experience of coercion (n = 170 patients) using chi-square tests and Mann Whitney U tests. We trained machine learning algorithms [logistic regression, Supported Vector Machine (SVM), and decision trees] with these risk factors and tested obtained models for their accuracy via five-fold cross validation. To verify the results we compared them to binary logistic regression. Results: In a model with 8 risk-factors which were available at admission, the SVM algorithm identified 102 out of 170 patients, which had experienced coercion and 174 out of 223 patients without coercion (69% accuracy with 60% sensitivity and 78% specificity, AUC 0.74). In a model with 18 risk-factors, available after discharge, the logistic regression algorithm identified 121 out of 170 with and 176 out of 223 without coercion (75% accuracy, 71% sensitivity, and 79% specificity, AUC 0.82). Discussion: Incorporating both clinical and demographic variables can help to estimate the risk of experiencing coercion for psychiatric patients. This study could show that trained machine learning algorithms are comparable to binary logistic regression and can reach a good or even excellent area under the curve (AUC) in the prediction of the outcome coercion/no coercion when cross validation is used. Due to the better generalizability machine learning is a promising approach for further studies, especially when more variables are analyzed. More detailed knowledge about individual risk factors may help to prevent the occurrence of situations involving coercion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6005877/ /pubmed/29946273 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00258 Text en Copyright © 2018 Hotzy, Theodoridou, Hoff, Schneeberger, Seifritz, Olbrich and Jäger. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Hotzy, Florian
Theodoridou, Anastasia
Hoff, Paul
Schneeberger, Andres R.
Seifritz, Erich
Olbrich, Sebastian
Jäger, Matthias
Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression
title Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression
title_full Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression
title_fullStr Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression
title_short Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression
title_sort machine learning: an approach in identifying risk factors for coercion compared to binary logistic regression
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29946273
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00258
work_keys_str_mv AT hotzyflorian machinelearninganapproachinidentifyingriskfactorsforcoercioncomparedtobinarylogisticregression
AT theodoridouanastasia machinelearninganapproachinidentifyingriskfactorsforcoercioncomparedtobinarylogisticregression
AT hoffpaul machinelearninganapproachinidentifyingriskfactorsforcoercioncomparedtobinarylogisticregression
AT schneebergerandresr machinelearninganapproachinidentifyingriskfactorsforcoercioncomparedtobinarylogisticregression
AT seifritzerich machinelearninganapproachinidentifyingriskfactorsforcoercioncomparedtobinarylogisticregression
AT olbrichsebastian machinelearninganapproachinidentifyingriskfactorsforcoercioncomparedtobinarylogisticregression
AT jagermatthias machinelearninganapproachinidentifyingriskfactorsforcoercioncomparedtobinarylogisticregression