Cargando…

Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules via Ultrasonography: Initial Clinical Experience

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for detection of thyroid cancers via ultrasonography (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 50 consecutive patients with 117 thyroid nodules on US during the period between June 2016 and July...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoo, Young Jin, Ha, Eun Ju, Cho, Yoon Joo, Kim, Hye Lin, Han, Miran, Kang, So Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29962872
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.665
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for detection of thyroid cancers via ultrasonography (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 50 consecutive patients with 117 thyroid nodules on US during the period between June 2016 and July 2016. A radiologist performed US examinations using real-time CAD integrated into a US scanner. We compared the diagnostic performance of radiologist, the CAD system, and the CAD-assisted radiologist for the detection of thyroid cancers. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the CAD system were 80.0, 88.1, 83.3, 85.5, and 84.6%, respectively, and were not significantly different from those of the radiologist (p > 0.05). The CAD-assisted radiologist showed improved diagnostic sensitivity compared with the radiologist alone (92.0% vs. 84.0%, p = 0.037), while the specificity and PPV were reduced (85.1% vs. 95.5%, p = 0.005 and 82.1% vs. 93.3%, p = 0.008). The radiologist assisted by the CAD system exhibited better diagnostic sensitivity and NPV than the CAD system alone (92.0% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.009 and 93.4% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.013), while the specificities and PPVs were not significantly different (88.1% vs. 85.1%, p = 0.151 and 83.3% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.613, respectively). CONCLUSION: The CAD system may be an adjunct to radiological intervention in the diagnosis of thyroid cancer.